Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2019-12-01.

826 277
Domains with MX
600 095
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
826 277
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted328 14239.71%
2Google Workspace139 67916.9%
3Unknown / Other55 9596.77%
4Microsoft 36549 4135.98%
5Yandex 36045 9755.56%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)27 1693.29%
7GoDaddy18 4592.23%
8Zoho Mail11 8681.44%
9Beget (RU)11 2881.37%
10Generic / unmatched (mail.*)11 1901.35%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Mail.ru for Business6 8490.83%
12SpamExperts (SolarWinds)6 6030.8%
13Ukraine.com.ua hosting6 3960.77%
14Namecheap Email Forwarding6 3680.77%
15Mimecast5 3120.64%
16OVH Mail5 2590.64%
17Timeweb (RU)5 1070.62%
18Proofpoint4 4920.54%
19Rackspace Email4 4820.54%
20QQ Mail (Tencent)4 3820.53%
21Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)4 2190.51%
22Reg.ru3 7830.46%
23Hostinger3 4800.42%
24NIC.RU Mail2 7360.33%
25DreamHost2 5100.3%
26Symantec MessageLabs2 3390.28%
27Mailgun (inbound)2 0990.25%
28Barracuda2 0070.24%
291&1 IONOS1 9830.24%
30Amazon WorkMail1 8630.23%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
11.59%
95 753 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
34 197
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
39.73%
328 280 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp23 7363.96%
2Mandrill18 3403.06%
3SendGrid (Twilio)15 9212.65%
4Zendesk13 2532.21%
5Mailgun13 1052.18%
6Amazon SES10 7981.8%
7MailChannels8 6781.45%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)6 8261.14%
9Namecheap Forwarding6 7381.12%
10Mimecast4 2590.71%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mailjet (Sinch)4 0200.67%
12Unisender (RU)3 8980.65%
13Salesforce3 4910.58%
14SendPulse3 0010.5%
15Elastic Email2 9680.49%
16Marketo (Adobe)2 7220.45%
17Postmark2 2570.38%
18SparkPost2 1040.35%
19MailHostBox1 9040.32%
20Help Scout1 8340.31%
21Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)1 8280.3%
22A Random Server (parking)1 6310.27%
23MailerSend1 2020.2%
24Locaweb (BR)1 1560.19%
25Emsd1 (transactional)1 1250.19%
26Freshdesk1 0980.18%
27SMTP2GO1 0950.18%
28Zoho Campaigns1 0770.18%
29SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)9620.16%
30Barracuda Essentials9120.15%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)3 4470.57%
2Shopify1 5370.26%
3Statuspage (Atlassian)1 1810.2%
4BigCommerce1 1330.19%
5Trustpilot9890.16%
6Qualtrics6930.12%
7CodeTwo Email Signatures 3656670.11%
8Zendesk5590.09%
9NetSuite (Oracle)5540.09%
10ClickDimensions5540.09%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11PayPal Braintree5490.09%
12RetailCRM5180.09%
13Firebase (Google)5050.08%
14Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)3280.05%
15KnowBe43200.05%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)2730.05%
17Greenhouse2720.05%
18Squarespace2470.04%
19Docebo (LMS)1750.03%
20ConnectWise1600.03%
21Recurly1290.02%
22Autotask (ConnectWise)1260.02%
23Brightspace (D2L)1250.02%
24One.com (DK hosting)1130.02%
25SchoolMessenger920.02%
26Gannett (USA Today)910.02%
27pair Networks910.02%
28Sage Intacct860.01%
29Umantis (Haufe HR)840.01%
30Oracle Cloud580.01%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.25%30d ago▲ +1.03%90d ago▲ +1.88%1y ago▲ +4.30%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com3 490
2smx3.web-hosting.com3 423
3smx1.web-hosting.com3 422
4mx01.1and1.com2 013
5mx00.1and1.com2 008
6mx-in03b.natrohost.com915
7mx-in03.natrohost.com912
8mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net802
9mx1.netsolmail.net796
10mx01.1and1.co.uk783
11mx00.1and1.co.uk775
12mx01.1and1.fr679
13mx00.1and1.fr677
14mx-in01.natrohost.com625
15mx-in01b.natrohost.com623
16antispam1.ihs.com.tr621
17antispam2.ihs.com.tr620
18mx-in02.natrohost.com564
19mx-in02b.natrohost.com563
20mx-in04.natrohost.com549
21mx-in04b.natrohost.com548
22mx76.mb1p.com540
23mx76.m2bp.com540
24localhost522
25mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua491
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua491
27mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua490
28mx01.1and1.es485
29mx00.1and1.es484
30mail.net4india.com450
31mx7.webfaction.com446
32mail-s30.1gb.ru445
33mx8.webfaction.com443
34mx9.webfaction.com433
35smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net382
36mx247.in-mx.com375
37mx247.in-mx.net375
38mx1.jimdo.com351
39mx2.jimdo.com351
40mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk347
41mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr329
42cluster.relay.agava.net320
43mailgw.nic.in318
44mxs.activeby.net317
45mmxs.majordomo.ru303
46asp.reflexion.net291
47smtp-fwd.wordpress.com285
48mx2.tmdhosting.com270
49mx1.tmdhosting.com269
50mxs.oml.ru251
51igw5002.site4now.net250
52mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk244
53mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk241
54mail-s27.1gb.ru231
55mx-backup.serveriai.lt227
56mx-100.reflexion.net226
57mx1.supremebox.com224
58mx2.supremebox.com223
59mx-110.reflexion.net223
60mxs.ht-systems.ru222
61in.hes.trendmicro.eu220
62mx4.name.com202
63mx5.name.com201
64mx3.name.com201
65mx7.name.com200
66mx6.name.com199
67mx8.name.com199
68relay2.netnames.net194
69webmail2.sitebuildit.com194
70mx30.aha.ru193
71mx1.filterantispam.com189
72mx.ukrdomen.com189
73relay1.netnames.net189
74sitemail.everyone.net188
75mx2.filterantispam.com186
76mx2.uh.com.ua185
77smx4.web-hosting.com176
78cyber.mail.trdns.com174
79mx1.emailowl.com172
80mx01.vargonen.net172
81mx2.emailowl.com169
82mx3.emailowl.com168
83mx3.volusion.com167
84ni-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr167
85rd-spamexperts.guzel.net.tr167
86mx4.volusion.com166
87mail.b-io.co157
88mx1.zone.eu157
89mail.bpaamail.com156
90mx2.zone.eu155
91mx.unoeuro.com151
92nan151
93mx1.1gb.com.ua150
94mx1.dewaspamguard.com146
95mx2.dewaspamguard.com146
96mail-u5.1gb.ua140
97mx1.flockmail.com134
98mail-fr.securemail.pro131
99mx2.flockmail.com129
100mx07.register.com127

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com5 098
2webhostbox.net3 705
3_netblockshalon.natrohost.com2 837
4_spfcls.natrohost.com2 818
5nicmail.ru2 550
6_spf.hoster.by1 744
7spf1.mailchannels.net1 514
8spf2.mailchannels.net1 496
9beget.ru1 203
10_spf.protection.veridyen.com1 066
11_spf.turhost.com963
12_spf.fastmail.gr921
13cmail1.com870
14getcourse.ru830
15infusionmail.com790
16spf.mail.intercom.io788
17outlook.com760
18hostmonster.com743
19_spf.trwww.com672
20spf.hostmar.com619
21spf.autopilothq.com602
22hotmail.com504
23_spf.nicegrup.com493
24spf.hes.trendmicro.com470
25_spf.mx1.mirohost.net465
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26netangels.ru439
27justhost.com434
28_spf.ps.kz397
29e2ma.net384
30msgfocus.com376
31ncfp.asia373
32icpbounce.com361
33mailcontrol.com360
34spf.serveriai.lt347
35gmail.com344
36_spf.emfwd.name-services.com335
37webmail.ihs.com.tr335
38spf.masterbase.com331
39spf1.auinmeio.com.br330
40google.com329
41_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com328
42spf2.auinmeio.com.br326
43bmsend.com325
44_spf.ofis.net318
45datadrivenemail.com309
46smtp.groovehq.com308
47gridhost.co.uk306
48spf.get-n-post.ru303
49relay.sered.net302
50spf.webapps.net296
51mail.insales.ru293
52send.aweber.com285
53turbo-smtp.com282
54sharepointonline.com279
55_spf.uni5.net271
56smtp1.uservoice.com267
57spf.mailcluster.com.au263
58_spf.acquia.com263
59appriver.com262
60spf.theeml.com260
61email-od.com258
62spf.mindbox.ru256
63reflexion.net255
64ncapp02.com249
65neolocation.net248
66_spf.embluemail.com247
67salesforce.com246
68mh.blackboard.com245
69_netblocks.google.com243
70email.freshservice.com242
71spf.mschosting.com241
72_spf.syrahost.com239
73spf.nl2go.com238
74_spf.act-on.net238
75_spf.zdsys.com238
76spf.whservidor.com236
77_spf.anpdm.com235
78_spf.websupport.sk233
79_spf.megagroup.ru233
80spf.migadu.com229
81_spf.site4now.net228
82netcore.co.in224
83spf.mailigen.com223
84_spf.serviciodecorreo.es223
85relay.dc.besthosting.ua218
86outboundmail.convio.net216
87_spf.masterhost.ru210
88_spf.transip.email198
89spf.zixsmbhosted.com197
90rhostbh.com192
91_spf.heteml.jp190
92_spf.cretaforce.gr190
93_netblocks2.google.com187
94spf.maropost.com186
95spf.linuxpl.com186
96rnmk.com183
97spf.protection.3dcart.com183
98mxlogic.net183
99spf.secure.ne.jp181
100spf.a2hosting.com179

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2019-12-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T12:34:46Z.