Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2019-08-01.

1 162 343
Domains with MX
819 141
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
1 162 343
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted448 11138.55%
2Google Workspace196 51016.91%
3Unknown / Other82 0117.06%
4Microsoft 36574 7926.43%
5Yandex 36064 3855.54%
6Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)39 3623.39%
7GoDaddy30 1142.59%
8Beget (RU)16 2811.4%
9Generic / unmatched (mail.*)15 8891.37%
10Zoho Mail15 8851.37%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Mail.ru for Business10 0140.86%
12Ukraine.com.ua hosting9 6750.83%
13SpamExperts (SolarWinds)8 6100.74%
14Timeweb (RU)8 2180.71%
15Mimecast8 0770.69%
16Namecheap Email Forwarding7 8040.67%
17Rackspace Email7 1620.62%
18OVH Mail6 8150.59%
19Proofpoint5 9400.51%
20Reg.ru5 8400.5%
21Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)5 4700.47%
22QQ Mail (Tencent)5 3650.46%
23NIC.RU Mail4 2910.37%
24Hostinger4 0160.35%
25DreamHost3 6520.31%
26Symantec MessageLabs3 5430.3%
27Barracuda3 5250.3%
28SpaceWeb (RU)2 9770.26%
29Hoster.by (BY)2 6570.23%
30Mailgun (inbound)2 5940.22%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
11.99%
139 373 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
45 940
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
38.57%
448 266 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp31 5703.85%
2Mandrill24 2972.97%
3SendGrid (Twilio)21 5992.64%
4Zendesk17 0902.09%
5Mailgun16 6172.03%
6Amazon SES12 7051.55%
7MailChannels9 7451.19%
8SpamExperts (SolarWinds)8 6861.06%
9Namecheap Forwarding8 2401.01%
10Mimecast6 6030.81%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mailjet (Sinch)4 9050.6%
12Unisender (RU)4 7740.58%
13Salesforce4 3650.53%
14Elastic Email3 7960.46%
15Marketo (Adobe)3 7780.46%
16Postmark3 0140.37%
17SparkPost2 8890.35%
18MailHostBox2 8650.35%
19SendPulse2 8580.35%
20Help Scout2 1950.27%
21A Random Server (parking)2 1510.26%
22Locaweb (BR)1 9480.24%
23Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)1 8850.23%
24SMTP2GO1 6400.2%
25Barracuda Essentials1 5810.19%
26Host-H (BG)1 4860.18%
27MailerSend1 3620.17%
28Zoho Campaigns1 3510.16%
29Freshdesk1 3240.16%
30SpamExperts (AntiSpamCloud)1 3080.16%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)5 5020.67%
2BigCommerce1 7120.21%
3Shopify1 6300.2%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 4520.18%
5Trustpilot1 1690.14%
6CodeTwo Email Signatures 3651 0040.12%
7Qualtrics9290.11%
8ClickDimensions7880.1%
9Zendesk7470.09%
10NetSuite (Oracle)7350.09%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11PayPal Braintree6850.08%
12Firebase (Google)5750.07%
13RetailCRM5640.07%
14Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)4090.05%
15Squarespace3860.05%
16KnowBe43840.05%
17Freshsales (Freshworks)3580.04%
18Greenhouse3070.04%
19ConnectWise2670.03%
20Docebo (LMS)2130.03%
21Autotask (ConnectWise)1990.02%
22Recurly1500.02%
23SchoolMessenger1470.02%
24Brightspace (D2L)1270.02%
25One.com (DK hosting)1200.01%
26Sage Intacct1110.01%
27Gannett (USA Today)1060.01%
28pair Networks1050.01%
29Umantis (Haufe HR)790.01%
30Oracle Cloud720.01%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▼ -46.78%30d ago▼ -46.00%90d ago▼ -45.15%1y ago▼ -42.73%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1smx2.web-hosting.com4 611
2smx1.web-hosting.com4 517
3smx3.web-hosting.com4 516
4mx00.1and1.com3 443
5mx01.1and1.com3 441
6p.webcom.ctmail.com2 004
7mx1.netsolmail.net1 538
8mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net1 438
9mx-in03b.natrohost.com1 342
10mx-in03.natrohost.com1 341
11mx01.1and1.co.uk1 133
12mx00.1and1.co.uk1 123
13mx01.1and1.fr920
14mx00.1and1.fr913
15mail.net4india.com861
16mx-in01b.natrohost.com847
17mx-in01.natrohost.com846
18localhost790
19mx01.1and1.es762
20mx-in02b.natrohost.com762
21mx00.1and1.es760
22mx-in02.natrohost.com759
23antispam1.ihs.com.tr743
24antispam2.ihs.com.tr742
25mail-s30.1gb.ru711
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx7.webfaction.com667
27mx8.webfaction.com662
28mx9.webfaction.com654
29asp.reflexion.net618
30mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua615
31mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua615
32mx76.mb1p.com612
33mx76.m2bp.com612
34mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua612
35mxs.oml.ru609
36mxs.activeby.net575
37mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk569
38mx247.in-mx.com559
39mx247.in-mx.net559
40mmxs.majordomo.ru508
41mx1.jimdo.com502
42mx2.jimdo.com502
43mx-100.reflexion.net499
44mx-110.reflexion.net490
45cluster.relay.agava.net482
46mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk454
47mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk451
48smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net438
49mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr430
50igw5002.site4now.net401
51smtp-fwd.wordpress.com390
52mx-backup.serveriai.lt364
53mail-s27.1gb.ru362
54mx2.tmdhosting.com362
55mx1.tmdhosting.com361
56in.hes.trendmicro.eu359
57mxs.ht-systems.ru351
58mx-in04.natrohost.com350
59mx-in04b.natrohost.com350
60mx1.supremebox.com345
61mailgw.nic.in345
62mx2.supremebox.com343
63sitemail.everyone.net313
64mx30.aha.ru311
65relay1.netnames.net282
66relay2.netnames.net282
67mx4.name.com274
68mx3.volusion.com273
69mx5.name.com273
70mx4.volusion.com272
71mx8.name.com272
72mx7.name.com272
73mx6.name.com270
74mx3.name.com270
75webmail2.sitebuildit.com270
761-grid-mx01.co.za264
771-grid-mx03.co.za264
781-grid-mx02.com263
791-grid-mx04.com263
80mx07.register.com260
81mail.b-io.co258
82mx.ukrdomen.com254
83mx2.uh.com.ua250
84smx4.web-hosting.com248
85mx1.inbox.co.il243
86mx1.emailowl.com243
87inbound.registeredsite.com237
88mx3.emailowl.com236
89mx2.emailowl.com235
90mx1.filterantispam.com234
91cyber.mail.trdns.com233
92mx2.filterantispam.com232
93mx2.dewaspamguard.com230
94mx1.dewaspamguard.com229
95mx1.1gb.com.ua218
96mx1.zone.eu215
97mx2.zone.eu214
98mx01.vargonen.net206
99mx01.schlund.de205
100mx00.schlund.de204

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com8 364
2nicmail.ru4 023
3_netblockshalon.natrohost.com3 524
4_spfcls.natrohost.com3 508
5_spf.hoster.by2 827
6spf1.mailchannels.net2 006
7spf2.mailchannels.net1 989
8beget.ru1 976
9cmail1.com1 292
10hostmonster.com1 177
11outlook.com1 163
12_spf.turhost.com1 160
13infusionmail.com1 099
14_spf.fastmail.gr1 093
15_spf.protection.veridyen.com1 010
16spf.mail.intercom.io994
17getcourse.ru993
18spf.hostmar.com854
19spf.autopilothq.com795
20_spf.trwww.com775
21_spf.ps.kz728
22hotmail.com719
23spf.hes.trendmicro.com716
24netangels.ru680
25justhost.com672
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26_spf.mx1.mirohost.net644
27icpbounce.com620
28_spf.emfwd.name-services.com618
29e2ma.net594
30_spf.nicegrup.com589
31_spf.megagroup.ru577
32mailcontrol.com519
33reflexion.net517
34spf.serveriai.lt513
35appriver.com505
36gmail.com496
37msgfocus.com493
38bmsend.com481
39ncfp.asia474
40_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com470
41neolocation.net453
42_spf.ofis.net440
43gridhost.co.uk438
44spf.masterbase.com435
45spf.aserv.co.za435
46google.com428
47_spf.act-on.net427
48sharepointonline.com424
49spf.mailcluster.com.au416
50_spf.syrahost.com415
51mail.insales.ru401
52spf1.auinmeio.com.br400
53spf2.auinmeio.com.br397
54webmail.ihs.com.tr391
55_spf.site4now.net385
56spf.webapps.net382
57spf.zixsmbhosted.com380
58spf.whservidor.com375
59smtp.groovehq.com372
60turbo-smtp.com367
61email.freshservice.com365
62salesforce.com364
63outboundmail.convio.net357
64spf.mschosting.com357
65email-od.com356
66send.aweber.com345
67smtp1.uservoice.com338
68spf.theeml.com335
69_spf.websupport.sk331
70datadrivenemail.com328
71mxlogic.net327
72_spf.heteml.jp322
73spf.hostedmail.net.au320
74spf.get-n-post.ru316
75rhostbh.com316
76netcore.co.in315
77_spf.uni5.net315
78_spf.zdsys.com311
79_spf.acquia.com308
80relay.dc.besthosting.ua303
81spf.nl2go.com302
82_spf.serviciodecorreo.es302
83_netblocks.google.com299
84_spf.embluemail.com291
85spfoxby.atservers.net284
86relay.sered.net275
87custspf.register.com273
88spf.protection.3dcart.com271
89spf.mailigen.com268
90mh.blackboard.com267
91md02.com265
92spf.linuxpl.com261
93_spf.masterhost.ru255
94spf.maropost.com249
95spf.raiolanetworks.com248
96worldsecuresystems.com248
97ncapp02.com245
98spf.migadu.com244
99spf.mindbox.ru243
100customer.mailguard.com.au242

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2019-08-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T12:54:14Z.