Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2019-10-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-Hosted | 379 124 | 39.22% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 161 781 | 16.74% |
| 3 | Unknown / Other | 66 595 | 6.89% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 61 308 | 6.34% |
| 5 | Yandex 360 | 53 151 | 5.5% |
| 6 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 32 035 | 3.31% |
| 7 | GoDaddy | 22 962 | 2.38% |
| 8 | Beget (RU) | 14 103 | 1.46% |
| 9 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 13 443 | 1.39% |
| 10 | Zoho Mail | 12 867 | 1.33% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mail.ru for Business | 8 239 | 0.85% |
| 12 | Ukraine.com.ua hosting | 7 815 | 0.81% |
| 13 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 7 121 | 0.74% |
| 14 | Namecheap Email Forwarding | 6 873 | 0.71% |
| 15 | Timeweb (RU) | 6 675 | 0.69% |
| 16 | Mimecast | 6 675 | 0.69% |
| 17 | OVH Mail | 5 959 | 0.62% |
| 18 | Rackspace Email | 5 514 | 0.57% |
| 19 | Proofpoint | 5 264 | 0.54% |
| 20 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 4 884 | 0.51% |
| 21 | Reg.ru | 4 637 | 0.48% |
| 22 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 4 285 | 0.44% |
| 23 | Hostinger | 3 689 | 0.38% |
| 24 | NIC.RU Mail | 3 569 | 0.37% |
| 25 | DreamHost | 2 963 | 0.31% |
| 26 | Barracuda | 2 862 | 0.3% |
| 27 | Symantec MessageLabs | 2 837 | 0.29% |
| 28 | SpaceWeb (RU) | 2 313 | 0.24% |
| 29 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 242 | 0.23% |
| 30 | Hoster.by (BY) | 2 235 | 0.23% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mailchimp | 27 111 | 3.92% |
| 2 | Mandrill | 20 645 | 2.98% |
| 3 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 18 529 | 2.68% |
| 4 | Zendesk | 14 764 | 2.13% |
| 5 | Mailgun | 14 582 | 2.11% |
| 6 | Amazon SES | 11 497 | 1.66% |
| 7 | MailChannels | 10 754 | 1.55% |
| 8 | Namecheap Forwarding | 7 272 | 1.05% |
| 9 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 7 253 | 1.05% |
| 10 | Mimecast | 5 403 | 0.78% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 4 493 | 0.65% |
| 12 | Unisender (RU) | 4 258 | 0.61% |
| 13 | Salesforce | 4 088 | 0.59% |
| 14 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 345 | 0.48% |
| 15 | Elastic Email | 3 292 | 0.48% |
| 16 | SendPulse | 2 892 | 0.42% |
| 17 | Postmark | 2 659 | 0.38% |
| 18 | SparkPost | 2 445 | 0.35% |
| 19 | MailHostBox | 2 284 | 0.33% |
| 20 | Help Scout | 2 022 | 0.29% |
| 21 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 1 842 | 0.27% |
| 22 | A Random Server (parking) | 1 791 | 0.26% |
| 23 | Campaign Monitor | 1 599 | 0.23% |
| 24 | SMTP2GO | 1 331 | 0.19% |
| 25 | MailerSend | 1 269 | 0.18% |
| 26 | Barracuda Essentials | 1 263 | 0.18% |
| 27 | Locaweb (BR) | 1 249 | 0.18% |
| 28 | Freshdesk | 1 184 | 0.17% |
| 29 | Emsd1 (transactional) | 1 177 | 0.17% |
| 30 | Constant Contact | 1 170 | 0.17% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 4 584 | 0.66% |
| 2 | Shopify | 1 468 | 0.21% |
| 3 | BigCommerce | 1 353 | 0.2% |
| 4 | Statuspage (Atlassian) | 1 322 | 0.19% |
| 5 | Trustpilot | 1 025 | 0.15% |
| 6 | GetCourse | 890 | 0.13% |
| 7 | Qualtrics | 868 | 0.13% |
| 8 | CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 | 816 | 0.12% |
| 9 | ClickDimensions | 694 | 0.1% |
| 10 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 667 | 0.1% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Zendesk | 648 | 0.09% |
| 12 | PayPal Braintree | 617 | 0.09% |
| 13 | RetailCRM | 540 | 0.08% |
| 14 | Firebase (Google) | 539 | 0.08% |
| 15 | Blackboard | 384 | 0.06% |
| 16 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 376 | 0.05% |
| 17 | KnowBe4 | 376 | 0.05% |
| 18 | Megagroup | 352 | 0.05% |
| 19 | Microsoft SharePoint | 343 | 0.05% |
| 20 | InSales | 340 | 0.05% |
| 21 | Freshservice (Freshworks) | 333 | 0.05% |
| 22 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 329 | 0.05% |
| 23 | Salesforce | 317 | 0.05% |
| 24 | Acquia | 315 | 0.05% |
| 25 | Greenhouse | 311 | 0.04% |
| 26 | Groove | 309 | 0.04% |
| 27 | UserVoice | 303 | 0.04% |
| 28 | Squarespace | 289 | 0.04% |
| 29 | ConnectWise | 240 | 0.03% |
| 30 | amoCRM (Kommo) | 204 | 0.03% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 53 819 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 635 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 8 034 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 753 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 897 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 765 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 674 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 272 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 3 195 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 858 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 2 701 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 330 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 266 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 117 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 827 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 750 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 716 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 456 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 364 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 1 329 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 300 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 291 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 223 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 213 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 064 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 055 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 051 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 044 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 039 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 976 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 887 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 886 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 788 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 772 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 702 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 694 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 643 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 610 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 607 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 584 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 568 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com | 556 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 508 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 507 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 478 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 474 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 453 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 443 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 439 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 436 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 385 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 381 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 371 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 359 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 359 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 358 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 352 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 341 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 334 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1 | 330 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 325 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 325 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 324 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 314 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 312 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 296 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 281 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 276 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 271 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 269 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 258 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 250 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 247 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 244 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 236 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 231 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 227 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 225 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 223 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 211 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 206 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 199 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 196 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 190 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 186 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1; | 185 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 182 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 179 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 178 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 176 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 175 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 172 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 172 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 171 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 169 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 168 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 164 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 161 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 158 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | smx2.web-hosting.com | 4 030 |
| 2 | smx1.web-hosting.com | 3 946 |
| 3 | smx3.web-hosting.com | 3 944 |
| 4 | mx01.1and1.com | 2 769 |
| 5 | mx00.1and1.com | 2 763 |
| 6 | p.webcom.ctmail.com | 1 605 |
| 7 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 1 118 |
| 8 | mx1.netsolmail.net | 1 097 |
| 9 | mx-in03.natrohost.com | 1 058 |
| 10 | mx-in03b.natrohost.com | 1 058 |
| 11 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 924 |
| 12 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 914 |
| 13 | mx01.1and1.fr | 821 |
| 14 | mx00.1and1.fr | 817 |
| 15 | mx01.1and1.es | 677 |
| 16 | mx00.1and1.es | 675 |
| 17 | mx-in01.natrohost.com | 675 |
| 18 | mx-in01b.natrohost.com | 675 |
| 19 | mail.net4india.com | 656 |
| 20 | mx76.mb1p.com | 651 |
| 21 | mx76.m2bp.com | 651 |
| 22 | localhost | 647 |
| 23 | mail-s30.1gb.ru | 630 |
| 24 | mx-in02b.natrohost.com | 609 |
| 25 | mx-in02.natrohost.com | 607 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | antispam1.ihs.com.tr | 594 |
| 27 | antispam2.ihs.com.tr | 592 |
| 28 | mx0.mail7.freehost.com.ua | 589 |
| 29 | mx1.mail7.freehost.com.ua | 589 |
| 30 | mx2.mail7.freehost.com.ua | 588 |
| 31 | mx7.webfaction.com | 559 |
| 32 | mx8.webfaction.com | 552 |
| 33 | mx9.webfaction.com | 543 |
| 34 | smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net | 533 |
| 35 | asp.reflexion.net | 488 |
| 36 | mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk | 475 |
| 37 | mx247.in-mx.com | 462 |
| 38 | mx247.in-mx.net | 462 |
| 39 | mxs.activeby.net | 452 |
| 40 | mmxs.majordomo.ru | 450 |
| 41 | cluster.relay.agava.net | 444 |
| 42 | mx1.jimdo.com | 422 |
| 43 | mx2.jimdo.com | 422 |
| 44 | mx-100.reflexion.net | 404 |
| 45 | mx-in04.natrohost.com | 403 |
| 46 | mx-in04b.natrohost.com | 402 |
| 47 | mx-110.reflexion.net | 390 |
| 48 | mxs.oml.ru | 388 |
| 49 | mailgw.nic.in | 387 |
| 50 | mailbackup3.doruk.net.tr | 353 |
| 51 | mail-s27.1gb.ru | 341 |
| 52 | igw5002.site4now.net | 337 |
| 53 | smtp-fwd.wordpress.com | 335 |
| 54 | mxs.ht-systems.ru | 305 |
| 55 | mx2.tmdhosting.com | 301 |
| 56 | mx1.tmdhosting.com | 300 |
| 57 | in.hes.trendmicro.eu | 295 |
| 58 | mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk | 289 |
| 59 | mx1.supremebox.com | 286 |
| 60 | mx2.supremebox.com | 285 |
| 61 | mx30.aha.ru | 283 |
| 62 | mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk | 283 |
| 63 | mx-backup.serveriai.lt | 266 |
| 64 | webmail2.sitebuildit.com | 264 |
| 65 | mx4.name.com | 260 |
| 66 | mx3.name.com | 259 |
| 67 | mx5.name.com | 259 |
| 68 | mx8.name.com | 256 |
| 69 | mx7.name.com | 255 |
| 70 | mx6.name.com | 255 |
| 71 | mx.ukrdomen.com | 250 |
| 72 | mx2.uh.com.ua | 248 |
| 73 | smx4.web-hosting.com | 246 |
| 74 | relay2.netnames.net | 227 |
| 75 | sitemail.everyone.net | 226 |
| 76 | relay1.netnames.net | 224 |
| 77 | mx1.emailowl.com | 222 |
| 78 | mx2.emailowl.com | 218 |
| 79 | mx3.emailowl.com | 214 |
| 80 | mx1.filterantispam.com | 213 |
| 81 | mx2.filterantispam.com | 209 |
| 82 | mx1.1gb.com.ua | 208 |
| 83 | nan | 206 |
| 84 | mail.b-io.co | 194 |
| 85 | mx00.schlund.de | 186 |
| 86 | mx07.register.com | 185 |
| 87 | mx01.schlund.de | 185 |
| 88 | mail-u5.1gb.ua | 181 |
| 89 | mx1.zone.eu | 175 |
| 90 | mx2.zone.eu | 175 |
| 91 | mx2.dewaspamguard.com | 173 |
| 92 | inbound.registeredsite.com | 173 |
| 93 | mx3.volusion.com | 173 |
| 94 | cyber.mail.trdns.com | 173 |
| 95 | mx1.dewaspamguard.com | 172 |
| 96 | mx4.volusion.com | 171 |
| 97 | mail.bpaamail.com | 167 |
| 98 | 1-grid-mx01.co.za | 166 |
| 99 | 1-grid-mx03.co.za | 166 |
| 100 | 1-grid-mx02.com | 165 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ncfp.asia | 490 |
| 2 | spf.webapps.net | 348 |
| 3 | neolocation.net | 335 |
| 4 | spf1.auinmeio.com.br | 316 |
| 5 | spf2.auinmeio.com.br | 310 |
| 6 | ncapp02.com | 306 |
| 7 | relay.sered.net | 294 |
| 8 | spf.whservidor.com | 274 |
| 9 | relay.dc.besthosting.ua | 272 |
| 10 | rnmk.com | 260 |
| 11 | md02.com | 255 |
| 12 | spfoxby.atservers.net | 227 |
| 13 | _spf.masterhost.ru | 219 |
| 14 | spf-es-ru.com | 211 |
| 15 | _spf.jino.ru | 208 |
| 16 | _spf.uni5.net | 208 |
| 17 | spf.messaging.microsoft.com | 204 |
| 18 | _spf.ns-tr.com | 191 |
| 19 | setup.ru | 190 |
| 20 | _spf-ipv6.yandex.ru | 184 |
| 21 | worldsecuresystems.com | 184 |
| 22 | spf.v6send.net | 181 |
| 23 | _spf.dnscini.com | 174 |
| 24 | _spf.majordomo.ru | 170 |
| 25 | spf.tld.pl | 165 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | spf.263xmail.com | 163 |
| 27 | activetrail.com | 155 |
| 28 | antispameurope.com | 153 |
| 29 | _spf.zone.eu | 152 |
| 30 | mojohost.com | 151 |
| 31 | spf.lianamailer.com | 150 |
| 32 | ocmail.in | 150 |
| 33 | _spf.lnwdns.com | 148 |
| 34 | spf.totaalholding.nl | 147 |
| 35 | ofsys.com | 146 |
| 36 | relays.webhost-mail.com | 145 |
| 37 | spf.sendcloud.org | 142 |
| 38 | spf.qpostie.com | 140 |
| 39 | _spf.zenbox.pl | 140 |
| 40 | spf.ymem.net | 136 |
| 41 | verticalresponse.com | 133 |
| 42 | _spf.domeneshop.no | 133 |
| 43 | veinteractive.biz | 129 |
| 44 | spf.icoremail.net | 128 |
| 45 | _spf.freshbooks.com | 127 |
| 46 | rhostjh.com | 127 |
| 47 | spf.shopback.com.br | 126 |
| 48 | bluehornet.com | 126 |
| 49 | sendloop-1.com | 126 |
| 50 | t.contactlab.it | 124 |
| 51 | constantcontact.com | 122 |
| 52 | spf.aknamail.com.br | 121 |
| 53 | spf.protection.partner.outlook.cn | 119 |
| 54 | 1govuc.gov.my | 116 |
| 55 | _spf.admincontrolpanel.com | 115 |
| 56 | amazonaws.com | 112 |
| 57 | outbound.mailhop.org | 112 |
| 58 | spf.host.ru | 112 |
| 59 | mojsite.com | 112 |
| 60 | _spf.activegate-ss.jp | 112 |
| 61 | _spf.wh.cloud.z.com | 112 |
| 62 | spf.mail.s-web.de | 111 |
| 63 | _spf.postaffiliatepro.com | 111 |
| 64 | webcas.net | 111 |
| 65 | spf.hekko.pl | 109 |
| 66 | spf.dominioabsoluto.net | 109 |
| 67 | spf.profesionalhosting.com | 108 |
| 68 | secure-mail-gateway.ixirhost.com | 108 |
| 69 | mailer.rees46.com | 107 |
| 70 | smp.ne.jp | 106 |
| 71 | spf.mailroute.net | 105 |
| 72 | spf.blackboardconnect.com | 105 |
| 73 | tigertech.net | 104 |
| 74 | spf.virtualtarget.com.br | 104 |
| 75 | ip4 | 103 |
| 76 | cmposta.com | 102 |
| 77 | _spf.academicworks.com | 102 |
| 78 | _mail.dhosting.pl | 102 |
| 79 | _spf.ladesk.com | 101 |
| 80 | inxserver.com | 101 |
| 81 | spf.topdesk.net | 101 |
| 82 | spf.umbler.com | 100 |
| 83 | retailspf.smtp.com | 99 |
| 84 | _senderspf.copernica.com | 99 |
| 85 | mailplug.com | 98 |
| 86 | messaging-master.com | 97 |
| 87 | spf2.topdns.com | 96 |
| 88 | spf1.topdns.com | 96 |
| 89 | _spf.spaceweb.ru | 95 |
| 90 | es-spf-ext.com | 95 |
| 91 | mailspf.smtp.com | 95 |
| 92 | _spf.loading.es | 95 |
| 93 | spf-0018d701.pphosted.com | 94 |
| 94 | _spf.abcp.ru | 93 |
| 95 | spf.blacknight.ie | 93 |
| 96 | _spf.e-activist.com | 93 |
| 97 | spf.epoch.com | 92 |
| 98 | bslogin.com | 92 |
| 99 | spf.theemaillaundry.net | 91 |
| 100 | mail.mailingboss.net | 91 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.