Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2019-06-01.

1 205 558
Domains with MX
822 402
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
1 205 558
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted412 03134.18%
2Google Workspace223 99118.58%
3Unknown / Other107 7878.94%
4Microsoft 365102 5598.51%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)54 1014.49%
6GoDaddy40 2163.34%
7Yandex 36022 8971.9%
8Generic / unmatched (mail.*)21 4151.78%
9Zoho Mail12 8931.07%
10OVH Mail11 3430.94%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Mimecast10 7260.89%
12Rackspace Email10 2880.85%
13SpamExperts (SolarWinds)9 3210.77%
14QQ Mail (Tencent)8 7810.73%
15Namecheap Email Forwarding8 0160.66%
16Proofpoint7 7030.64%
17Beget (RU)5 8710.49%
18Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)5 6760.47%
19DreamHost5 4230.45%
20Barracuda5 4170.45%
211&1 IONOS5 3280.44%
22Symantec MessageLabs5 2190.43%
23Locaweb (BR)4 5330.38%
24All-Inkl (DE)3 7620.31%
25Strato (DE)3 7120.31%
26Mail.ru for Business3 2020.27%
27Mailgun (inbound)3 2010.27%
28Proofpoint Essentials3 1350.26%
29ISPGateway (DE)3 0330.25%
30Amazon WorkMail3 0200.25%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
15.44%
186 100 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
62 798
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
34.19%
412 173 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mailchimp40 2094.89%
2SendGrid (Twilio)31 7903.87%
3Mandrill31 3623.81%
4Zendesk25 3823.09%
5Mailgun20 1472.45%
6Amazon SES15 2951.86%
7SpamExperts (SolarWinds)8 8571.08%
8Mimecast8 5821.04%
9Namecheap Forwarding8 4841.03%
10MailChannels7 4750.91%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mailjet (Sinch)6 9580.85%
12Salesforce5 1030.62%
13Locaweb (BR)5 0040.61%
14Marketo (Adobe)4 4180.54%
15SparkPost4 0810.5%
16Postmark3 7830.46%
17Elastic Email3 7520.46%
18Help Scout2 6210.32%
19Barracuda Essentials2 3680.29%
20Unisender (RU)2 3200.28%
21Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)2 2560.27%
22SMTP2GO2 1550.26%
23Constant Contact2 0950.25%
24MailHostBox2 0190.25%
25Exclaimer (signatures)1 7380.21%
26Freshdesk1 6600.2%
27SendPulse1 5080.18%
28Emsd1 (transactional)1 4810.18%
29MailerSend1 4080.17%
30Zoho Campaigns1 2890.16%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)6 4380.78%
2BigCommerce2 4630.3%
3Shopify1 9530.24%
4Trustpilot1 8920.23%
5Statuspage (Atlassian)1 5980.19%
6CodeTwo Email Signatures 3651 2600.15%
7ClickDimensions1 1180.14%
8Qualtrics1 0910.13%
9Zendesk9290.11%
10NetSuite (Oracle)8860.11%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11PayPal Braintree7900.1%
12Firebase (Google)5850.07%
13Squarespace5600.07%
14KnowBe45270.06%
15Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)4340.05%
16ConnectWise3790.05%
17Freshsales (Freshworks)3630.04%
18Greenhouse3580.04%
19SchoolMessenger3400.04%
20One.com (DK hosting)3250.04%
21RetailCRM2700.03%
22Autotask (ConnectWise)2640.03%
23Docebo (LMS)2540.03%
24Shoptet2200.03%
25Recurly1710.02%
26Brightspace (D2L)1380.02%
27pair Networks1330.02%
28Gannett (USA Today)1320.02%
29Sage Intacct1290.02%
30Umantis (Haufe HR)1040.01%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▼ -46.78%30d ago▼ -46.00%90d ago▼ -45.15%1y ago▼ -42.73%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx01.1and1.com4 654
2mx00.1and1.com4 646
3p.webcom.ctmail.com3 639
4smx2.web-hosting.com2 766
5smx1.web-hosting.com2 635
6smx3.web-hosting.com2 635
7mx1.netsolmail.net2 344
8mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net1 924
9mx01.1and1.es1 870
10mx00.1and1.es1 861
11mx01.1and1.co.uk1 826
12mx00.1and1.co.uk1 817
13mx01.1and1.fr1 522
14mx00.1and1.fr1 520
15mx1.jimdo.com1 203
16mx2.jimdo.com1 203
17asp.reflexion.net1 087
18mx-100.reflexion.net873
19mx-110.reflexion.net856
20mx7.webfaction.com817
21mx8.webfaction.com813
22mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk800
23mx9.webfaction.com797
24mx00.schlund.de724
25mx01.schlund.de724
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx1.filterantispam.com697
27mx2.filterantispam.com689
28localhost625
29mail.net4india.com617
30mx.unoeuro.com541
31in.hes.trendmicro.eu524
32smtp-fwd.wordpress.com519
33smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net485
34mx-backup.serveriai.lt475
35mx76.mb1p.com468
36mx76.m2bp.com468
37mx3.volusion.com458
38mx4.volusion.com458
39sitemail.everyone.net453
40ntvirus.url.com.tw410
41ntvirus2.url.com.tw408
42inbound.registeredsite.com405
43relay1.netnames.net395
44relay2.netnames.net395
45mx07.register.com382
46webmail2.sitebuildit.com368
47posta3.mediacenter.hu366
48posta.mediacenter.hu365
49posta2.mediacenter.hu365
50posta4.mediacenter.hu365
51posta5.mediacenter.hu363
52mailgw.nic.in359
53mx.usa.net321
54mx1d10.thinline.cz302
55mx1b20.thinline.cz301
56igw5002.site4now.net291
57mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk285
58mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk284
59mailin.mx-hub.sk280
60mailin.mx-hub.cz277
61mailin.mx-hub.eu277
62backupmx.hostmaster.sk275
63mx1.tmdhosting.com275
64mx2.tmdhosting.com275
65mx3.hostmaster.sk272
66smx4.web-hosting.com262
67mail2.infomart2000.com262
68smtp-avas.seeweb.it261
69mx4.name.com257
70mx3.name.com257
71mx5.name.com256
72mx7.name.com255
73mx8.name.com254
74mx6.name.com254
75mx1.supremebox.com253
76mx2.supremebox.com252
77mx1.cleanmx.pt250
78mail-fr.securemail.pro248
79mx2.cleanmx.pt246
80mx364.umbler.com244
81smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it241
82mx240.umbler.co.uk239
83s.mail.dcsaas.net235
84mx.ct.mbox.net234
85mx1.emailowl.com227
86mx2.emailowl.com223
87mail.global.frontbridge.com222
88mx3.emailowl.com222
89mx1.savana.cz220
90mx2.savana.cz217
91mx01.1and1.mx216
92mx00.1and1.mx215
93nan215
94relay.exohosting.sk212
95relay1.exohosting.sk211
96mail-pt.securemail.pro210
97mx-cache.online.net209
98relay2.dnsserver.eu209
99mx1.krystal.co.uk209
100mx2.krystal.co.uk209

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com11 049
2spf1.mailchannels.net2 688
3spf2.mailchannels.net2 668
4outlook.com1 874
5cmail1.com1 742
6hostmonster.com1 614
7_spf.websupport.sk1 549
8infusionmail.com1 447
9spf.hostmar.com1 418
10spf.mail.intercom.io1 145
11spf.linuxpl.com1 107
12spf.whservidor.com978
13_spf.fastmail.gr974
14nicmail.ru952
15spf.webapps.net948
16icpbounce.com878
17spf.hes.trendmicro.com873
18spf.tld.pl849
19e2ma.net845
20_spf.uni5.net827
21spf.autopilothq.com823
22appriver.com820
23reflexion.net817
24justhost.com791
25beget.ru753
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.nl2go.com730
27mailcontrol.com705
28hotmail.com699
29spf.serveriai.lt661
30spf.zixsmbhosted.com625
31_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com623
32msgfocus.com620
33_spf.heteml.jp613
34gridhost.co.uk596
35_spf.srv.cat588
36_spf.zenbox.pl588
37_spf.emfwd.name-services.com586
38_spf.anpdm.com573
39spf1.auinmeio.com.br572
40spf2.auinmeio.com.br565
41bmsend.com564
42sharepointonline.com549
43google.com544
44outboundmail.convio.net541
45_spf.domeneshop.no533
46_spf.daum.net518
47turbo-smtp.com516
48_spf.act-on.net508
49spf.masterbase.com504
50spf.hekko.pl500
51spf.secure.ne.jp499
52mxlogic.net493
53salesforce.com477
54spf.smartemailing.cz476
55spf.protection.3dcart.com476
56email.freshservice.com468
57smtp.groovehq.com467
58getcourse.ru463
59_spfcls.natrohost.com462
60_spf.transip.email455
61email-od.com454
62_netblockshalon.natrohost.com452
63gmail.com444
64spf.mailcluster.com.au443
65worldsecuresystems.com429
66smtp1.uservoice.com426
67_spf.zdsys.com423
68smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg422
69relay.sered.net419
70_mail.dhosting.pl416
71spf.raiolanetworks.com414
72send.aweber.com409
73custspf.register.com403
74_spf.admincontrolpanel.com403
75mailanyone.net398
76spf.digitalinsight.com395
77ncfp.asia394
78spf.dondominio.com390
79_spf.embluemail.com382
80datadrivenemail.com370
81_spf.mixhost.jp364
82mh.blackboard.com363
83jangomail.com360
84_spf.syrahost.com360
85spf.hostedmail.net.au359
86_spf.hoster.by346
87_spf.acquia.com338
88spf.mailanyone.net338
89_netblocks.google.com315
90spf.mtaroutes.com311
91spf.maropost.com301
92spf.securemx.jp299
93spf.dominioabsoluto.net297
94protection.outlook.com294
95spf.mailengine1.com294
96spf.usa.net291
97spf.v6send.net289
98md02.com288
99emsmtp.com287
100exghost.com287

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2019-06-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T13:06:13Z.