Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2019-01-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-Hosted | 468 799 | 39.39% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 198 379 | 16.67% |
| 3 | Unknown / Other | 100 181 | 8.42% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 79 479 | 6.68% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 53 184 | 4.47% |
| 6 | GoDaddy | 41 873 | 3.52% |
| 7 | Yandex 360 | 27 348 | 2.3% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 21 880 | 1.84% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 14 865 | 1.25% |
| 10 | OVH Mail | 11 494 | 0.97% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Namecheap Email Forwarding | 9 044 | 0.76% |
| 12 | Rackspace Email | 9 011 | 0.76% |
| 13 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 8 838 | 0.74% |
| 14 | Mimecast | 7 828 | 0.66% |
| 15 | Beget (RU) | 6 998 | 0.59% |
| 16 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 6 643 | 0.56% |
| 17 | Proofpoint | 5 964 | 0.5% |
| 18 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 5 343 | 0.45% |
| 19 | DreamHost | 5 139 | 0.43% |
| 20 | Symantec MessageLabs | 4 777 | 0.4% |
| 21 | 1&1 IONOS | 4 290 | 0.36% |
| 22 | Barracuda | 3 684 | 0.31% |
| 23 | All-Inkl (DE) | 3 589 | 0.3% |
| 24 | Strato (DE) | 3 543 | 0.3% |
| 25 | Mail.ru for Business | 3 477 | 0.29% |
| 26 | ISPGateway (DE) | 3 087 | 0.26% |
| 27 | Gandi Mail | 2 984 | 0.25% |
| 28 | One.com mailpod | 2 831 | 0.24% |
| 29 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 805 | 0.24% |
| 30 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 2 729 | 0.23% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mailchimp | 33 400 | 4.26% |
| 2 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 31 429 | 4.01% |
| 3 | Mandrill | 28 108 | 3.59% |
| 4 | Zendesk | 25 492 | 3.25% |
| 5 | Mailgun | 17 288 | 2.21% |
| 6 | Amazon SES | 12 420 | 1.58% |
| 7 | Namecheap Forwarding | 9 545 | 1.22% |
| 8 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 7 404 | 0.94% |
| 9 | MailChannels | 7 189 | 0.92% |
| 10 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 6 006 | 0.77% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mimecast | 5 687 | 0.73% |
| 12 | Elastic Email | 3 773 | 0.48% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 3 762 | 0.48% |
| 14 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 595 | 0.46% |
| 15 | Postmark | 3 537 | 0.45% |
| 16 | Salesforce | 3 399 | 0.43% |
| 17 | MailHostBox | 3 015 | 0.38% |
| 18 | Unisender (RU) | 2 377 | 0.3% |
| 19 | Locaweb (BR) | 2 132 | 0.27% |
| 20 | Help Scout | 2 131 | 0.27% |
| 21 | A Random Server (parking) | 1 893 | 0.24% |
| 22 | SMTP2GO | 1 786 | 0.23% |
| 23 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 1 781 | 0.23% |
| 24 | Constant Contact | 1 456 | 0.19% |
| 25 | Freshdesk | 1 394 | 0.18% |
| 26 | MailerSend | 1 329 | 0.17% |
| 27 | SuperCP | 1 321 | 0.17% |
| 28 | Barracuda Essentials | 1 317 | 0.17% |
| 29 | SendPulse | 1 264 | 0.16% |
| 30 | Exclaimer (signatures) | 1 202 | 0.15% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 4 443 | 0.57% |
| 2 | BigCommerce | 2 099 | 0.27% |
| 3 | Trustpilot | 1 735 | 0.22% |
| 4 | Shopify | 1 375 | 0.18% |
| 5 | Statuspage (Atlassian) | 1 322 | 0.17% |
| 6 | Zendesk | 913 | 0.12% |
| 7 | ClickDimensions | 853 | 0.11% |
| 8 | Qualtrics | 818 | 0.1% |
| 9 | CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 | 811 | 0.1% |
| 10 | PayPal Braintree | 715 | 0.09% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 663 | 0.08% |
| 12 | Firebase (Google) | 475 | 0.06% |
| 13 | RetailCRM | 302 | 0.04% |
| 14 | Squarespace | 299 | 0.04% |
| 15 | KnowBe4 | 287 | 0.04% |
| 16 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 287 | 0.04% |
| 17 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 267 | 0.03% |
| 18 | Greenhouse | 262 | 0.03% |
| 19 | One.com (DK hosting) | 247 | 0.03% |
| 20 | ConnectWise | 221 | 0.03% |
| 21 | SchoolMessenger | 186 | 0.02% |
| 22 | Recurly | 163 | 0.02% |
| 23 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 159 | 0.02% |
| 24 | Shoptet | 158 | 0.02% |
| 25 | Docebo (LMS) | 153 | 0.02% |
| 26 | pair Networks | 119 | 0.02% |
| 27 | Gannett (USA Today) | 119 | 0.02% |
| 28 | Brightspace (D2L) | 105 | 0.01% |
| 29 | Sage Intacct | 77 | 0.01% |
| 30 | SurveyMonkey | 74 | 0.01% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 53 819 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 635 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 8 034 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 753 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 897 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 765 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 674 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 272 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 3 195 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 858 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 2 701 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 330 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 266 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 117 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 827 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 750 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 716 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 456 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 364 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 1 329 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 300 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 291 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 223 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 213 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 064 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 055 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 051 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 044 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 039 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 976 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 887 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 886 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 788 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 772 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 702 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 694 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 643 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 610 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 607 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 584 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 568 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com | 556 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 508 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 507 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 478 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 474 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 453 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 443 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 439 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 436 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 385 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 381 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 371 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 359 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 359 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 358 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 352 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 341 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 334 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1 | 330 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 325 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 325 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 324 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 314 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 312 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 296 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 281 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 276 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 271 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 269 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 258 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 250 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 247 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 244 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 236 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 231 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 227 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 225 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 223 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 211 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 206 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 199 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 196 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 190 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 186 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1; | 185 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 182 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 179 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 178 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 176 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 175 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 172 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 172 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 171 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 169 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 168 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 164 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 161 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 158 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | mx01.1and1.com | 5 145 |
| 2 | mx00.1and1.com | 5 140 |
| 3 | smx2.web-hosting.com | 3 014 |
| 4 | p.webcom.ctmail.com | 2 979 |
| 5 | smx1.web-hosting.com | 2 885 |
| 6 | smx3.web-hosting.com | 2 883 |
| 7 | mx1.netsolmail.net | 2 075 |
| 8 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 1 989 |
| 9 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 1 910 |
| 10 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 1 890 |
| 11 | mx01.1and1.fr | 1 716 |
| 12 | mx00.1and1.fr | 1 707 |
| 13 | mx01.1and1.es | 1 606 |
| 14 | mx00.1and1.es | 1 600 |
| 15 | mail.net4india.com | 1 013 |
| 16 | mx1.jimdo.com | 1 006 |
| 17 | mx2.jimdo.com | 1 006 |
| 18 | localhost | 955 |
| 19 | mx-backup.serveriai.lt | 858 |
| 20 | mx7.webfaction.com | 848 |
| 21 | mx8.webfaction.com | 842 |
| 22 | mx9.webfaction.com | 829 |
| 23 | asp.reflexion.net | 823 |
| 24 | mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk | 781 |
| 25 | mx01.schlund.de | 755 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mx00.schlund.de | 751 |
| 27 | mx76.mb1p.com | 708 |
| 28 | mx76.m2bp.com | 708 |
| 29 | mx-100.reflexion.net | 645 |
| 30 | mx-110.reflexion.net | 627 |
| 31 | smtp-fwd.wordpress.com | 579 |
| 32 | mx.unoeuro.com | 529 |
| 33 | smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net | 463 |
| 34 | sitemail.everyone.net | 444 |
| 35 | mx3.volusion.com | 431 |
| 36 | mx4.volusion.com | 429 |
| 37 | mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk | 425 |
| 38 | mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk | 419 |
| 39 | webmail2.sitebuildit.com | 412 |
| 40 | mx-in03.natrohost.com | 404 |
| 41 | mx-in03b.natrohost.com | 404 |
| 42 | in.hes.trendmicro.eu | 391 |
| 43 | inbound.registeredsite.com | 389 |
| 44 | relay2.netnames.net | 382 |
| 45 | relay1.netnames.net | 381 |
| 46 | mailgw.nic.in | 379 |
| 47 | igw5002.site4now.net | 375 |
| 48 | mx1.zone.eu | 369 |
| 49 | mx2.zone.eu | 369 |
| 50 | posta4.mediacenter.hu | 368 |
| 51 | mail.b-io.co | 367 |
| 52 | posta3.mediacenter.hu | 367 |
| 53 | posta.mediacenter.hu | 366 |
| 54 | posta2.mediacenter.hu | 366 |
| 55 | posta5.mediacenter.hu | 362 |
| 56 | mx-in01.natrohost.com | 359 |
| 57 | mx-in01b.natrohost.com | 358 |
| 58 | mx2.tmdhosting.com | 314 |
| 59 | mx1.supremebox.com | 313 |
| 60 | mx1.tmdhosting.com | 313 |
| 61 | mx2.supremebox.com | 311 |
| 62 | mx07.register.com | 301 |
| 63 | mx.usa.net | 296 |
| 64 | mx4.name.com | 292 |
| 65 | mx6.name.com | 291 |
| 66 | mx5.name.com | 290 |
| 67 | mx8.name.com | 290 |
| 68 | mx-in02.natrohost.com | 290 |
| 69 | mx-in02b.natrohost.com | 290 |
| 70 | mx7.name.com | 288 |
| 71 | mx3.name.com | 287 |
| 72 | smx4.web-hosting.com | 270 |
| 73 | antispam1.ihs.com.tr | 261 |
| 74 | antispam2.ihs.com.tr | 261 |
| 75 | mail.global.frontbridge.com | 260 |
| 76 | mail-fr.securemail.pro | 255 |
| 77 | mx1.premium.jfg-networks.net | 254 |
| 78 | mx2.premium.jfg-networks.net | 254 |
| 79 | mx1.emailowl.com | 252 |
| 80 | mx2.emailowl.com | 252 |
| 81 | mx3.emailowl.com | 248 |
| 82 | mx1d10.thinline.cz | 243 |
| 83 | mx1b20.thinline.cz | 240 |
| 84 | webmail.mail.maxns.net | 238 |
| 85 | nan | 238 |
| 86 | mail2.infomart2000.com | 235 |
| 87 | mx2.krystal.co.uk | 216 |
| 88 | mx1.krystal.co.uk | 215 |
| 89 | mx1.servage.net | 213 |
| 90 | mx2.firstfind.nl | 210 |
| 91 | mx1.firstfind.nl | 209 |
| 92 | mx2.servage.net | 208 |
| 93 | ntvirus.url.com.tw | 207 |
| 94 | ntvirus2.url.com.tw | 207 |
| 95 | inbound.mail.naiadsystems.com | 207 |
| 96 | backupmx.hostmaster.sk | 205 |
| 97 | mail-s30.1gb.ru | 205 |
| 98 | mx.ct.mbox.net | 204 |
| 99 | mx3.hostmaster.sk | 198 |
| 100 | mx.online.net | 196 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | bluehost.com | 11 780 |
| 2 | hostmonster.com | 1 686 |
| 3 | cmail1.com | 1 623 |
| 4 | outlook.com | 1 583 |
| 5 | _spf.fastmail.gr | 1 250 |
| 6 | infusionmail.com | 1 232 |
| 7 | _spfcls.natrohost.com | 1 214 |
| 8 | _netblockshalon.natrohost.com | 1 190 |
| 9 | _spf.websupport.sk | 1 134 |
| 10 | spf.serveriai.lt | 1 112 |
| 11 | nicmail.ru | 1 083 |
| 12 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 1 058 |
| 13 | beget.ru | 1 042 |
| 14 | spf.hostmar.com | 1 038 |
| 15 | justhost.com | 901 |
| 16 | spf.linuxpl.com | 858 |
| 17 | hotmail.com | 829 |
| 18 | icpbounce.com | 749 |
| 19 | _spf.emfwd.name-services.com | 702 |
| 20 | _spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com | 670 |
| 21 | spf.autopilothq.com | 666 |
| 22 | spf.hes.trendmicro.com | 657 |
| 23 | e2ma.net | 615 |
| 24 | mailcontrol.com | 614 |
| 25 | spf.tld.pl | 610 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | msgfocus.com | 572 |
| 27 | spf.webapps.net | 568 |
| 28 | _spf.turhost.com | 560 |
| 29 | spf.nl2go.com | 559 |
| 30 | gridhost.co.uk | 553 |
| 31 | reflexion.net | 547 |
| 32 | _spf.zenbox.pl | 535 |
| 33 | appriver.com | 531 |
| 34 | google.com | 528 |
| 35 | smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg | 498 |
| 36 | _spf.anpdm.com | 491 |
| 37 | gmail.com | 482 |
| 38 | spf.mailcluster.com.au | 480 |
| 39 | sharepointonline.com | 477 |
| 40 | spf.hostedmail.net.au | 470 |
| 41 | outboundmail.convio.net | 459 |
| 42 | spf.whservidor.com | 455 |
| 43 | bmsend.com | 448 |
| 44 | _spf.transip.email | 447 |
| 45 | turbo-smtp.com | 439 |
| 46 | salesforce.com | 435 |
| 47 | ncfp.asia | 434 |
| 48 | spf.masterbase.com | 432 |
| 49 | _spf.hoster.by | 427 |
| 50 | _spf.zdsys.com | 425 |
| 51 | worldsecuresystems.com | 419 |
| 52 | _spf.syrahost.com | 418 |
| 53 | smtp.groovehq.com | 417 |
| 54 | mxlogic.net | 412 |
| 55 | spf.protection.3dcart.com | 400 |
| 56 | smtp1.uservoice.com | 397 |
| 57 | spf.hekko.pl | 390 |
| 58 | spf.smartemailing.cz | 390 |
| 59 | spf.digitalinsight.com | 388 |
| 60 | _spf.srv.cat | 379 |
| 61 | email-od.com | 377 |
| 62 | spf.zixsmbhosted.com | 373 |
| 63 | _spf.domeneshop.no | 368 |
| 64 | _spf.heteml.jp | 363 |
| 65 | _spf.protection.veridyen.com | 358 |
| 66 | spf1.auinmeio.com.br | 354 |
| 67 | datadrivenemail.com | 353 |
| 68 | netcore.co.in | 351 |
| 69 | spf2.auinmeio.com.br | 350 |
| 70 | spf.dondominio.com | 349 |
| 71 | send.aweber.com | 341 |
| 72 | _spf.site4now.net | 341 |
| 73 | _spf.uni5.net | 337 |
| 74 | getcourse.ru | 332 |
| 75 | _spf.act-on.net | 331 |
| 76 | rhostbh.com | 322 |
| 77 | spf.mschosting.com | 321 |
| 78 | relay.sered.net | 319 |
| 79 | mh.blackboard.com | 318 |
| 80 | custspf.register.com | 309 |
| 81 | spf.totaalholding.nl | 308 |
| 82 | spf.raiolanetworks.com | 304 |
| 83 | pepipost.net | 300 |
| 84 | _mail.dhosting.pl | 293 |
| 85 | spf.secure.ne.jp | 292 |
| 86 | md02.com | 287 |
| 87 | _spf.embluemail.com | 287 |
| 88 | spf.mailengine1.com | 285 |
| 89 | mailanyone.net | 285 |
| 90 | rnmk.com | 284 |
| 91 | email.freshservice.com | 282 |
| 92 | jangomail.com | 282 |
| 93 | spf.aserv.co.za | 282 |
| 94 | _spf.acquia.com | 281 |
| 95 | _spf.zone.eu | 277 |
| 96 | spf.maropost.com | 275 |
| 97 | eblastengine.com | 273 |
| 98 | emsmtp.com | 266 |
| 99 | _netblocks.google.com | 266 |
| 100 | gandi.net | 264 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.