Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2018-12-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-Hosted | 420 310 | 35.14% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 213 287 | 17.83% |
| 3 | Unknown / Other | 110 149 | 9.21% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 96 652 | 8.08% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 57 025 | 4.77% |
| 6 | GoDaddy | 41 426 | 3.46% |
| 7 | Yandex 360 | 23 098 | 1.93% |
| 8 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 22 784 | 1.9% |
| 9 | Zoho Mail | 12 378 | 1.03% |
| 10 | OVH Mail | 11 937 | 1.0% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Mimecast | 10 083 | 0.84% |
| 12 | Rackspace Email | 10 046 | 0.84% |
| 13 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 8 130 | 0.68% |
| 14 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 7 939 | 0.66% |
| 15 | Namecheap Email Forwarding | 7 655 | 0.64% |
| 16 | Proofpoint | 6 793 | 0.57% |
| 17 | Symantec MessageLabs | 5 849 | 0.49% |
| 18 | Beget (RU) | 5 545 | 0.46% |
| 19 | 1&1 IONOS | 5 454 | 0.46% |
| 20 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 5 188 | 0.43% |
| 21 | DreamHost | 5 128 | 0.43% |
| 22 | Barracuda | 4 862 | 0.41% |
| 23 | Locaweb (BR) | 4 511 | 0.38% |
| 24 | Strato (DE) | 4 317 | 0.36% |
| 25 | All-Inkl (DE) | 4 100 | 0.34% |
| 26 | ISPGateway (DE) | 3 764 | 0.31% |
| 27 | Gandi Mail | 3 188 | 0.27% |
| 28 | Mail.ru for Business | 3 083 | 0.26% |
| 29 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 2 998 | 0.25% |
| 30 | Mailgun (inbound) | 2 825 | 0.24% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 39 177 | 4.94% |
| 2 | Mailchimp | 38 165 | 4.82% |
| 3 | Zendesk | 32 149 | 4.06% |
| 4 | Mandrill | 31 560 | 3.98% |
| 5 | Mailgun | 18 899 | 2.39% |
| 6 | Amazon SES | 13 782 | 1.74% |
| 7 | Namecheap Forwarding | 8 072 | 1.02% |
| 8 | Mimecast | 7 447 | 0.94% |
| 9 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 6 977 | 0.88% |
| 10 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 6 819 | 0.86% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | MailChannels | 5 490 | 0.69% |
| 12 | Locaweb (BR) | 4 965 | 0.63% |
| 13 | Marketo (Adobe) | 4 383 | 0.55% |
| 14 | SparkPost | 4 221 | 0.53% |
| 15 | Salesforce | 4 069 | 0.51% |
| 16 | Postmark | 4 012 | 0.51% |
| 17 | Elastic Email | 3 646 | 0.46% |
| 18 | Unisender (RU) | 2 292 | 0.29% |
| 19 | Help Scout | 2 239 | 0.28% |
| 20 | MailHostBox | 1 954 | 0.25% |
| 21 | SMTP2GO | 1 922 | 0.24% |
| 22 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 1 892 | 0.24% |
| 23 | Constant Contact | 1 776 | 0.22% |
| 24 | Barracuda Essentials | 1 768 | 0.22% |
| 25 | Freshdesk | 1 570 | 0.2% |
| 26 | Exclaimer (signatures) | 1 541 | 0.19% |
| 27 | MailerSend | 1 298 | 0.16% |
| 28 | AuthSMTP | 1 274 | 0.16% |
| 29 | Webempresa Mail | 1 220 | 0.15% |
| 30 | SendPulse | 1 193 | 0.15% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 5 900 | 0.74% |
| 2 | BigCommerce | 2 346 | 0.3% |
| 3 | Trustpilot | 1 838 | 0.23% |
| 4 | Statuspage (Atlassian) | 1 578 | 0.2% |
| 5 | Shopify | 1 456 | 0.18% |
| 6 | ClickDimensions | 1 072 | 0.14% |
| 7 | Zendesk | 1 066 | 0.13% |
| 8 | CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 | 1 059 | 0.13% |
| 9 | Qualtrics | 930 | 0.12% |
| 10 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 807 | 0.1% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | PayPal Braintree | 790 | 0.1% |
| 12 | Firebase (Google) | 462 | 0.06% |
| 13 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 392 | 0.05% |
| 14 | KnowBe4 | 361 | 0.05% |
| 15 | ConnectWise | 344 | 0.04% |
| 16 | Greenhouse | 318 | 0.04% |
| 17 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 278 | 0.04% |
| 18 | RetailCRM | 275 | 0.03% |
| 19 | One.com (DK hosting) | 273 | 0.03% |
| 20 | SchoolMessenger | 264 | 0.03% |
| 21 | Squarespace | 260 | 0.03% |
| 22 | Shoptet | 240 | 0.03% |
| 23 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 225 | 0.03% |
| 24 | Docebo (LMS) | 197 | 0.02% |
| 25 | Recurly | 185 | 0.02% |
| 26 | Gannett (USA Today) | 123 | 0.02% |
| 27 | pair Networks | 117 | 0.01% |
| 28 | Sage Intacct | 116 | 0.01% |
| 29 | Brightspace (D2L) | 107 | 0.01% |
| 30 | SurveyMonkey | 80 | 0.01% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 53 819 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 635 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 8 034 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 753 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 897 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 765 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 674 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 272 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 3 195 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 858 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 2 701 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 330 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 266 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 117 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 827 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 750 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 716 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 456 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 364 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 1 329 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 300 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 291 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 223 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 213 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 064 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 055 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 051 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 044 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 039 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 976 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 887 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 886 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 788 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 772 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 702 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 694 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 643 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 610 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 607 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 584 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 568 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com | 556 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 508 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 507 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 478 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 474 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 453 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 443 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 439 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 436 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 385 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 381 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 371 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 359 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 359 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 358 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 352 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 341 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 334 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1 | 330 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 325 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 325 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 324 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 314 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 312 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 296 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 281 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 276 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 271 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 269 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 258 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 250 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 247 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 244 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 236 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 231 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 227 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 225 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 223 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 211 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 206 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 199 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 196 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 190 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 186 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1; | 185 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 182 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 179 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 178 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 176 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 175 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 172 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 172 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 171 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 169 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 168 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 164 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 161 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 158 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | mx01.1and1.com | 4 989 |
| 2 | mx00.1and1.com | 4 971 |
| 3 | p.webcom.ctmail.com | 3 593 |
| 4 | mx1.netsolmail.net | 2 213 |
| 5 | mx01.1and1.es | 2 177 |
| 6 | mx00.1and1.es | 2 168 |
| 7 | smx2.web-hosting.com | 2 010 |
| 8 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 1 921 |
| 9 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 1 906 |
| 10 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 1 900 |
| 11 | smx3.web-hosting.com | 1 893 |
| 12 | smx1.web-hosting.com | 1 891 |
| 13 | mx01.1and1.fr | 1 793 |
| 14 | mx00.1and1.fr | 1 782 |
| 15 | mx1.jimdo.com | 1 207 |
| 16 | mx2.jimdo.com | 1 207 |
| 17 | asp.reflexion.net | 1 161 |
| 18 | mx01.schlund.de | 956 |
| 19 | mx00.schlund.de | 954 |
| 20 | mx-100.reflexion.net | 928 |
| 21 | mx7.webfaction.com | 894 |
| 22 | mx-110.reflexion.net | 890 |
| 23 | mx8.webfaction.com | 889 |
| 24 | mx9.webfaction.com | 873 |
| 25 | mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk | 852 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | localhost | 625 |
| 27 | mail.net4india.com | 604 |
| 28 | smtp-fwd.wordpress.com | 489 |
| 29 | relay1.netnames.net | 473 |
| 30 | mx-backup.serveriai.lt | 472 |
| 31 | mx4.volusion.com | 469 |
| 32 | relay2.netnames.net | 469 |
| 33 | mx3.volusion.com | 468 |
| 34 | in.hes.trendmicro.eu | 461 |
| 35 | smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net | 445 |
| 36 | sitemail.everyone.net | 439 |
| 37 | mx76.mb1p.com | 429 |
| 38 | mx76.m2bp.com | 429 |
| 39 | mx.unoeuro.com | 428 |
| 40 | inbound.registeredsite.com | 419 |
| 41 | mx07.register.com | 371 |
| 42 | ntvirus.url.com.tw | 369 |
| 43 | ntvirus2.url.com.tw | 367 |
| 44 | mailgw.nic.in | 360 |
| 45 | mx1d10.thinline.cz | 346 |
| 46 | mx1b20.thinline.cz | 344 |
| 47 | webmail2.sitebuildit.com | 343 |
| 48 | mx.usa.net | 325 |
| 49 | backupmx.hostmaster.sk | 309 |
| 50 | mailin.mx-hub.cz | 309 |
| 51 | mailin.mx-hub.sk | 309 |
| 52 | mailin.mx-hub.eu | 308 |
| 53 | mx3.hostmaster.sk | 303 |
| 54 | igw5002.site4now.net | 298 |
| 55 | mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk | 292 |
| 56 | mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk | 291 |
| 57 | posta4.mediacenter.hu | 287 |
| 58 | posta2.mediacenter.hu | 286 |
| 59 | posta3.mediacenter.hu | 286 |
| 60 | posta.mediacenter.hu | 285 |
| 61 | posta5.mediacenter.hu | 282 |
| 62 | mail-fr.securemail.pro | 279 |
| 63 | mail2.infomart2000.com | 277 |
| 64 | mail.global.frontbridge.com | 270 |
| 65 | mx8.name.com | 259 |
| 66 | mx4.name.com | 258 |
| 67 | mx7.name.com | 257 |
| 68 | mx3.name.com | 257 |
| 69 | mx5.name.com | 257 |
| 70 | mx6.name.com | 256 |
| 71 | mx1.tmdhosting.com | 248 |
| 72 | mx2.tmdhosting.com | 248 |
| 73 | mx00.1and1.mx | 245 |
| 74 | mx01.1and1.mx | 245 |
| 75 | mx364.umbler.com | 238 |
| 76 | s.mail.dcsaas.net | 234 |
| 77 | smx4.web-hosting.com | 234 |
| 78 | mx240.umbler.co.uk | 234 |
| 79 | smtp-avas.seeweb.it | 232 |
| 80 | mx1.savana.cz | 231 |
| 81 | mx.ct.mbox.net | 230 |
| 82 | mx2.savana.cz | 228 |
| 83 | smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it | 227 |
| 84 | nan | 223 |
| 85 | mx.orangegeek.net | 218 |
| 86 | mx1.cleanmx.pt | 217 |
| 87 | mx2.cleanmx.pt | 217 |
| 88 | mx2.dnsmadeeasy.com | 217 |
| 89 | mx1.servage.net | 216 |
| 90 | mx.online.net | 215 |
| 91 | mx1.dnsmadeeasy.com | 215 |
| 92 | mail1.sbnation.com | 213 |
| 93 | mx-cache.online.net | 211 |
| 94 | relay1.exohosting.sk | 211 |
| 95 | mx2.servage.net | 210 |
| 96 | webmail.mail.maxns.net | 209 |
| 97 | relay.exohosting.sk | 209 |
| 98 | mx1.emailowl.com | 206 |
| 99 | altmx2.orangegeek.net | 205 |
| 100 | altmx3.orangegeek.net | 205 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | bluehost.com | 11 245 |
| 2 | outlook.com | 2 054 |
| 3 | cmail1.com | 1 982 |
| 4 | _spf.websupport.sk | 1 668 |
| 5 | hostmonster.com | 1 580 |
| 6 | infusionmail.com | 1 437 |
| 7 | spf.hostmar.com | 1 424 |
| 8 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 1 193 |
| 9 | spf.linuxpl.com | 1 092 |
| 10 | nicmail.ru | 999 |
| 11 | spf.whservidor.com | 989 |
| 12 | _spf.fastmail.gr | 944 |
| 13 | icpbounce.com | 912 |
| 14 | beget.ru | 864 |
| 15 | spf.webapps.net | 845 |
| 16 | justhost.com | 808 |
| 17 | reflexion.net | 798 |
| 18 | e2ma.net | 786 |
| 19 | _spf.uni5.net | 776 |
| 20 | hotmail.com | 767 |
| 21 | spf.autopilothq.com | 757 |
| 22 | spf.hes.trendmicro.com | 754 |
| 23 | spf.tld.pl | 745 |
| 24 | mailcontrol.com | 727 |
| 25 | spf.nl2go.com | 703 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | appriver.com | 682 |
| 27 | msgfocus.com | 676 |
| 28 | spf.serveriai.lt | 631 |
| 29 | sharepointonline.com | 628 |
| 30 | gridhost.co.uk | 624 |
| 31 | _spf.anpdm.com | 622 |
| 32 | spf1.auinmeio.com.br | 621 |
| 33 | spf2.auinmeio.com.br | 613 |
| 34 | _spf.zenbox.pl | 599 |
| 35 | _spf.emfwd.name-services.com | 574 |
| 36 | _spf.heteml.jp | 573 |
| 37 | _spf.domeneshop.no | 573 |
| 38 | _spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com | 567 |
| 39 | google.com | 543 |
| 40 | outboundmail.convio.net | 540 |
| 41 | _spf.srv.cat | 538 |
| 42 | salesforce.com | 534 |
| 43 | _spfcls.natrohost.com | 531 |
| 44 | mxlogic.net | 527 |
| 45 | _netblockshalon.natrohost.com | 522 |
| 46 | bmsend.com | 518 |
| 47 | turbo-smtp.com | 503 |
| 48 | spf.zixsmbhosted.com | 497 |
| 49 | spf.hostedmail.net.au | 490 |
| 50 | _spf.transip.email | 489 |
| 51 | gmail.com | 479 |
| 52 | spf.protection.3dcart.com | 479 |
| 53 | smtp.groovehq.com | 476 |
| 54 | worldsecuresystems.com | 472 |
| 55 | spf.masterbase.com | 469 |
| 56 | spf.smartemailing.cz | 469 |
| 57 | spf.hekko.pl | 468 |
| 58 | smtp1.uservoice.com | 468 |
| 59 | _spf.zdsys.com | 461 |
| 60 | _spf.act-on.net | 456 |
| 61 | spf.mailcluster.com.au | 455 |
| 62 | spf.secure.ne.jp | 443 |
| 63 | email-od.com | 440 |
| 64 | smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg | 434 |
| 65 | _spf.admincontrolpanel.com | 414 |
| 66 | spf.dondominio.com | 411 |
| 67 | spf.digitalinsight.com | 385 |
| 68 | custspf.register.com | 378 |
| 69 | ncfp.asia | 375 |
| 70 | datadrivenemail.com | 366 |
| 71 | _spf.hoster.by | 365 |
| 72 | spf.raiolanetworks.com | 361 |
| 73 | email.freshservice.com | 361 |
| 74 | mh.blackboard.com | 356 |
| 75 | _spf.embluemail.com | 352 |
| 76 | _spf.syrahost.com | 351 |
| 77 | _mail.dhosting.pl | 344 |
| 78 | send.aweber.com | 343 |
| 79 | mailanyone.net | 335 |
| 80 | jangomail.com | 332 |
| 81 | getcourse.ru | 330 |
| 82 | spf.w4ymail.at | 329 |
| 83 | spf.messaging.microsoft.com | 328 |
| 84 | spf.blacknight.ie | 321 |
| 85 | spf.dominioabsoluto.net | 320 |
| 86 | spf.mailengine1.com | 314 |
| 87 | _spf.acquia.com | 310 |
| 88 | spf.mtaroutes.com | 306 |
| 89 | _spf.daum.net | 306 |
| 90 | pepipost.net | 305 |
| 91 | spf.mailanyone.net | 300 |
| 92 | spf.totaalholding.nl | 298 |
| 93 | spf.ymem.net | 296 |
| 94 | _spf.webhouse.sk | 294 |
| 95 | netcore.co.in | 294 |
| 96 | md02.com | 293 |
| 97 | emsmtp.com | 289 |
| 98 | eblastengine.com | 287 |
| 99 | rnmk.com | 286 |
| 100 | spf.v6send.net | 286 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.