Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2018-11-01.

1 177 133
Domains with MX
775 137
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
1 177 133
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted406 35334.52%
2Google Workspace211 16517.94%
3Unknown / Other109 9259.34%
4Microsoft 36596 5548.2%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)56 7464.82%
6GoDaddy42 9303.65%
7Generic / unmatched (mail.*)22 7551.93%
8Yandex 36022 2281.89%
9OVH Mail11 6930.99%
10Zoho Mail11 6220.99%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Rackspace Email10 6640.91%
12Mimecast10 0770.86%
13SpamExperts (SolarWinds)7 9680.68%
14QQ Mail (Tencent)7 9180.67%
15Namecheap Email Forwarding7 8070.66%
16Proofpoint6 7930.58%
17Symantec MessageLabs5 7920.49%
181&1 IONOS5 4560.46%
19DreamHost5 2750.45%
20Beget (RU)5 1440.44%
21Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)4 9580.42%
22Barracuda4 8790.41%
23Locaweb (BR)4 6440.39%
24All-Inkl (DE)4 1480.35%
25Strato (DE)4 1470.35%
26ISPGateway (DE)3 8140.32%
27Generic / unmatched (smtp.*)3 0970.26%
28Gandi Mail3 0550.26%
29Mail.ru for Business2 9930.25%
30One.com mailpod2 9040.25%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
16.36%
192 523 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
64 699
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
34.53%
406 487 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1SendGrid (Twilio)39 3415.08%
2Mailchimp37 8264.88%
3Zendesk32 0794.14%
4Mandrill31 0074.0%
5Mailgun18 7582.42%
6Amazon SES13 4651.74%
7Namecheap Forwarding8 2731.07%
8Mimecast7 3450.95%
9Mailjet (Sinch)6 6290.86%
10SpamExperts (SolarWinds)6 5590.85%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Locaweb (BR)5 1000.66%
12MailChannels4 7550.61%
13Marketo (Adobe)4 3160.56%
14Postmark4 1300.53%
15SparkPost4 1180.53%
16Salesforce3 8220.49%
17Elastic Email3 5000.45%
18Unisender (RU)2 1960.28%
19Help Scout2 1850.28%
20SMTP2GO1 9620.25%
21MailHostBox1 8290.24%
22Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)1 8210.23%
23Constant Contact1 7720.23%
24Barracuda Essentials1 7650.23%
25Exclaimer (signatures)1 5450.2%
26Freshdesk1 4970.19%
27AuthSMTP1 2490.16%
28MailerSend1 2190.16%
29KingHost (BR)1 1340.15%
30Salesforce Marketing Cloud1 1260.15%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)5 8280.75%
2BigCommerce2 3480.3%
3Trustpilot1 8180.23%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 5630.2%
5Shopify1 3720.18%
6ClickDimensions1 0850.14%
7Zendesk1 0760.14%
8CodeTwo Email Signatures 3651 0160.13%
9Qualtrics9180.12%
10NetSuite (Oracle)8190.11%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11PayPal Braintree8000.1%
12Firebase (Google)4490.06%
13KnowBe43710.05%
14Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)3690.05%
15ConnectWise3570.05%
16Greenhouse3230.04%
17Freshsales (Freshworks)2680.03%
18Squarespace2610.03%
19One.com (DK hosting)2600.03%
20RetailCRM2420.03%
21Autotask (ConnectWise)2270.03%
22SchoolMessenger2240.03%
23Shoptet2170.03%
24Docebo (LMS)1890.02%
25Recurly1790.02%
26Gannett (USA Today)1250.02%
27pair Networks1200.02%
28Sage Intacct1150.01%
29Brightspace (D2L)1030.01%
30SurveyMonkey680.01%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▼ -46.78%30d ago▼ -46.00%90d ago▼ -45.15%1y ago▼ -42.73%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx01.1and1.com5 095
2mx00.1and1.com5 074
3p.webcom.ctmail.com3 824
4mx1.netsolmail.net2 367
5mx01.1and1.es2 054
6mx00.1and1.es2 041
7smx2.web-hosting.com1 960
8mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net1 946
9mx01.1and1.co.uk1 867
10mx00.1and1.co.uk1 852
11smx1.web-hosting.com1 827
12smx3.web-hosting.com1 827
13mx01.1and1.fr1 756
14mx00.1and1.fr1 740
15asp.reflexion.net1 257
16mx1.jimdo.com1 212
17mx2.jimdo.com1 212
18mx-100.reflexion.net988
19mx-110.reflexion.net951
20mx01.schlund.de899
21mx00.schlund.de892
22mx7.webfaction.com872
23mx8.webfaction.com869
24mx9.webfaction.com856
25mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk791
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26localhost654
27smtp-fwd.wordpress.com555
28mx3.volusion.com524
29mx4.volusion.com522
30mail.net4india.com494
31sitemail.everyone.net489
32inbound.registeredsite.com472
33in.hes.trendmicro.eu471
34relay1.netnames.net469
35relay2.netnames.net467
36mx.unoeuro.com457
37smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net447
38mx-backup.serveriai.lt387
39mx76.mb1p.com382
40mx76.m2bp.com382
41mx07.register.com380
42webmail2.sitebuildit.com365
43mx.usa.net354
44mx1d10.thinline.cz330
45mx1b20.thinline.cz328
46mailgw.nic.in317
47mail.global.frontbridge.com312
48ntvirus.url.com.tw302
49ntvirus2.url.com.tw301
50posta3.mediacenter.hu299
51posta4.mediacenter.hu299
52posta2.mediacenter.hu297
53posta.mediacenter.hu293
54posta5.mediacenter.hu293
55igw5002.site4now.net290
56mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk284
57mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk283
58mailin.mx-hub.sk280
59mailin.mx-hub.cz279
60backupmx.hostmaster.sk278
61mailin.mx-hub.eu278
62mx4.name.com272
63mx3.hostmaster.sk271
64mx7.name.com270
65mx5.name.com270
66mx6.name.com270
67mx3.name.com269
68mx8.name.com269
69smtp-avas.seeweb.it266
70mx1.savana.cz265
71mx2.savana.cz264
72mail2.infomart2000.com257
73mx.orangegeek.net248
74mx.ct.mbox.net246
75smx4.web-hosting.com239
76mx1.supremebox.com237
77mx1.cleanmx.pt236
78altmx2.orangegeek.net234
79mx2.supremebox.com234
80mx2.cleanmx.pt233
81altmx3.orangegeek.net233
82mx364.umbler.com233
83mx240.umbler.co.uk229
84mx1.servage.net228
85mx1.dnsmadeeasy.com227
86mx1.premium.jfg-networks.net226
87mx2.premium.jfg-networks.net226
88relay.exohosting.sk226
89relay1.exohosting.sk226
90relay2.dnsserver.eu222
91mx2.servage.net222
92mx2.dnsmadeeasy.com220
93relay3.dnsserver.eu217
94mx.online.net215
95mx-cache.online.net212
96mx2.firstfind.nl212
97webmail.mail.maxns.net211
98nan211
99mx1.firstfind.nl210
100mx1.emailowl.com209

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com11 881
2outlook.com2 098
3cmail1.com2 000
4hostmonster.com1 637
5_spf.websupport.sk1 503
6infusionmail.com1 425
7spf.mail.intercom.io1 206
8spf.hostmar.com1 147
9spf.whservidor.com1 049
10spf.linuxpl.com1 003
11nicmail.ru951
12icpbounce.com918
13reflexion.net868
14spf.webapps.net822
15beget.ru821
16justhost.com810
17_spf.uni5.net795
18_spf.fastmail.gr780
19e2ma.net775
20appriver.com758
21spf.tld.pl738
22hotmail.com730
23spf.autopilothq.com727
24spf.hes.trendmicro.com723
25mailcontrol.com691
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26msgfocus.com682
27spf.nl2go.com680
28sharepointonline.com631
29_spf.domeneshop.no624
30_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com610
31mxlogic.net601
32_spf.emfwd.name-services.com594
33gridhost.co.uk591
34spf1.auinmeio.com.br590
35_spf.anpdm.com586
36spf2.auinmeio.com.br581
37google.com565
38_spf.zenbox.pl555
39salesforce.com552
40spf.serveriai.lt539
41outboundmail.convio.net538
42_spfcls.natrohost.com523
43spf.zixsmbhosted.com512
44worldsecuresystems.com511
45_netblockshalon.natrohost.com509
46bmsend.com499
47_spf.srv.cat495
48turbo-smtp.com490
49spf.smartemailing.cz476
50smtp.groovehq.com475
51_spf.zdsys.com473
52smtp1.uservoice.com469
53spf.protection.3dcart.com467
54gmail.com462
55_spf.heteml.jp456
56spf.hekko.pl456
57_spf.act-on.net448
58spf.masterbase.com440
59email-od.com438
60spf.secure.ne.jp422
61spf.mailcluster.com.au419
62spf.hostedmail.net.au417
63custspf.register.com416
64_spf.transip.email403
65smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg399
66spf.digitalinsight.com393
67_spf.admincontrolpanel.com384
68mailanyone.net379
69email.freshservice.com375
70ncfp.asia372
71datadrivenemail.com361
72mh.blackboard.com356
73spf.w4ymail.at347
74spf.dondominio.com341
75jangomail.com339
76_spf.hoster.by338
77spf.raiolanetworks.com332
78_spf.syrahost.com332
79spf.messaging.microsoft.com330
80spf.mtaroutes.com320
81send.aweber.com319
82relays.webhost-mail.com317
83spf.mailengine1.com314
84_spf.embluemail.com314
85spf.ymem.net309
86getcourse.ru306
87spf.maropost.com305
88_spf.acquia.com303
89eblastengine.com297
90emsmtp.com291
91spf.dominioabsoluto.net287
92spf.clearslide.com287
93spf.blacknight.ie287
94spf.v6send.net287
95rnmk.com284
96pepipost.net283
97_mail.dhosting.pl283
98spf.mailanyone.net276
99md02.com275
100exghost.com272

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2018-11-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T13:45:31Z.