Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2018-08-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-Hosted | 436 387 | 36.54% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 199 924 | 16.74% |
| 3 | Unknown / Other | 112 719 | 9.44% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 89 094 | 7.46% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 58 397 | 4.89% |
| 6 | GoDaddy | 40 663 | 3.4% |
| 7 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 24 387 | 2.04% |
| 8 | Yandex 360 | 23 420 | 1.96% |
| 9 | OVH Mail | 12 132 | 1.02% |
| 10 | Zoho Mail | 11 926 | 1.0% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Rackspace Email | 10 068 | 0.84% |
| 12 | Mimecast | 9 342 | 0.78% |
| 13 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 7 865 | 0.66% |
| 14 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 7 181 | 0.6% |
| 15 | Namecheap Email Forwarding | 7 171 | 0.6% |
| 16 | 1&1 IONOS | 6 242 | 0.52% |
| 17 | Proofpoint | 6 202 | 0.52% |
| 18 | Symantec MessageLabs | 6 017 | 0.5% |
| 19 | Locaweb (BR) | 5 668 | 0.47% |
| 20 | Beget (RU) | 5 077 | 0.43% |
| 21 | DreamHost | 4 971 | 0.42% |
| 22 | Strato (DE) | 4 906 | 0.41% |
| 23 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 4 771 | 0.4% |
| 24 | All-Inkl (DE) | 4 521 | 0.38% |
| 25 | Barracuda | 4 110 | 0.34% |
| 26 | ISPGateway (DE) | 4 045 | 0.34% |
| 27 | One.com mailpod | 3 312 | 0.28% |
| 28 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 3 206 | 0.27% |
| 29 | Gandi Mail | 3 053 | 0.26% |
| 30 | Mail.ru for Business | 2 967 | 0.25% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 38 987 | 5.05% |
| 2 | Mailchimp | 35 338 | 4.57% |
| 3 | Zendesk | 31 539 | 4.08% |
| 4 | Mandrill | 31 382 | 4.06% |
| 5 | Mailgun | 17 889 | 2.32% |
| 6 | Amazon SES | 12 749 | 1.65% |
| 7 | Namecheap Forwarding | 7 556 | 0.98% |
| 8 | Mimecast | 6 626 | 0.86% |
| 9 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 6 316 | 0.82% |
| 10 | Locaweb (BR) | 6 264 | 0.81% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 5 450 | 0.71% |
| 12 | MailChannels | 4 620 | 0.6% |
| 13 | SparkPost | 4 357 | 0.56% |
| 14 | Postmark | 4 167 | 0.54% |
| 15 | Marketo (Adobe) | 4 088 | 0.53% |
| 16 | Elastic Email | 3 517 | 0.46% |
| 17 | Salesforce | 3 395 | 0.44% |
| 18 | Unisender (RU) | 2 289 | 0.3% |
| 19 | Help Scout | 2 150 | 0.28% |
| 20 | MailHostBox | 1 894 | 0.25% |
| 21 | SMTP2GO | 1 770 | 0.23% |
| 22 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 1 705 | 0.22% |
| 23 | Constant Contact | 1 573 | 0.2% |
| 24 | Freshdesk | 1 523 | 0.2% |
| 25 | Barracuda Essentials | 1 444 | 0.19% |
| 26 | KingHost (BR) | 1 432 | 0.19% |
| 27 | Exclaimer (signatures) | 1 426 | 0.18% |
| 28 | A Random Server (parking) | 1 265 | 0.16% |
| 29 | AuthSMTP | 1 219 | 0.16% |
| 30 | MailerSend | 1 201 | 0.16% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 5 371 | 0.7% |
| 2 | BigCommerce | 2 219 | 0.29% |
| 3 | Trustpilot | 1 994 | 0.26% |
| 4 | Statuspage (Atlassian) | 1 458 | 0.19% |
| 5 | Shopify | 1 195 | 0.15% |
| 6 | Zendesk | 1 073 | 0.14% |
| 7 | ClickDimensions | 1 039 | 0.13% |
| 8 | CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 | 848 | 0.11% |
| 9 | Qualtrics | 818 | 0.11% |
| 10 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 745 | 0.1% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | PayPal Braintree | 741 | 0.1% |
| 12 | Firebase (Google) | 383 | 0.05% |
| 13 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 312 | 0.04% |
| 14 | ConnectWise | 302 | 0.04% |
| 15 | Greenhouse | 288 | 0.04% |
| 16 | One.com (DK hosting) | 278 | 0.04% |
| 17 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 253 | 0.03% |
| 18 | KnowBe4 | 241 | 0.03% |
| 19 | RetailCRM | 235 | 0.03% |
| 20 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 225 | 0.03% |
| 21 | Shoptet | 215 | 0.03% |
| 22 | Recurly | 180 | 0.02% |
| 23 | SchoolMessenger | 173 | 0.02% |
| 24 | Docebo (LMS) | 160 | 0.02% |
| 25 | Gannett (USA Today) | 115 | 0.01% |
| 26 | pair Networks | 108 | 0.01% |
| 27 | Sage Intacct | 108 | 0.01% |
| 28 | Brightspace (D2L) | 91 | 0.01% |
| 29 | SurveyMonkey | 66 | 0.01% |
| 30 | Squarespace | 48 | 0.01% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 53 819 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 635 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 8 034 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 753 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 897 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 765 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 674 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 272 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 3 195 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 858 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 2 701 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 330 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 266 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 117 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 827 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 750 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 716 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 456 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 364 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 1 329 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 300 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 291 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 223 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 213 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 064 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 055 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 051 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 044 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 039 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 976 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 887 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 886 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 788 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 772 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 702 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 694 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 643 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 610 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 607 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 584 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 568 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com | 556 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 508 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 507 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 478 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 474 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 453 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 443 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 439 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 436 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 385 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 381 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 371 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 359 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 359 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 358 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 352 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 341 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 334 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1 | 330 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 325 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 325 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 324 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 314 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 312 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 296 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 281 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 276 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 271 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 269 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 258 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 250 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 247 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 244 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 236 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 231 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 227 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 225 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 223 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 211 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 206 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 199 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 196 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 190 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 186 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1; | 185 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 182 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 179 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 178 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 176 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 175 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 172 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 172 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 171 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 169 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 168 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 164 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 161 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 158 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | mx01.1and1.com | 4 621 |
| 2 | mx00.1and1.com | 4 598 |
| 3 | p.webcom.ctmail.com | 3 337 |
| 4 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 2 253 |
| 5 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 2 234 |
| 6 | mx01.1and1.es | 2 093 |
| 7 | mx00.1and1.es | 2 081 |
| 8 | mx1.netsolmail.net | 2 055 |
| 9 | smx2.web-hosting.com | 1 901 |
| 10 | mx01.1and1.fr | 1 804 |
| 11 | smx1.web-hosting.com | 1 795 |
| 12 | smx3.web-hosting.com | 1 794 |
| 13 | mx00.1and1.fr | 1 792 |
| 14 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 1 776 |
| 15 | mx1.jimdo.com | 1 397 |
| 16 | mx2.jimdo.com | 1 397 |
| 17 | asp.reflexion.net | 1 109 |
| 18 | mx01.schlund.de | 1 094 |
| 19 | mx00.schlund.de | 1 088 |
| 20 | mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk | 985 |
| 21 | mx-100.reflexion.net | 877 |
| 22 | mx-110.reflexion.net | 852 |
| 23 | mx7.webfaction.com | 842 |
| 24 | mx8.webfaction.com | 838 |
| 25 | mx9.webfaction.com | 820 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | mail.net4india.com | 570 |
| 27 | localhost.mx.* | 559 |
| 28 | mx3.volusion.com | 504 |
| 29 | mx4.volusion.com | 502 |
| 30 | mx-backup.serveriai.lt | 489 |
| 31 | sitemail.everyone.net | 470 |
| 32 | smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net | 465 |
| 33 | mx.unoeuro.com | 461 |
| 34 | smtp-fwd.wordpress.com | 456 |
| 35 | in.hes.trendmicro.eu | 434 |
| 36 | relay1.netnames.net | 426 |
| 37 | relay2.netnames.net | 426 |
| 38 | inbound.registeredsite.com | 423 |
| 39 | mail.blogsky.com | 415 |
| 40 | mailin.mx-hub.sk | 384 |
| 41 | mailin.mx-hub.eu | 383 |
| 42 | mailin.mx-hub.cz | 382 |
| 43 | posta3.mediacenter.hu | 366 |
| 44 | posta4.mediacenter.hu | 366 |
| 45 | posta2.mediacenter.hu | 365 |
| 46 | posta.mediacenter.hu | 361 |
| 47 | posta5.mediacenter.hu | 361 |
| 48 | mx76.m2bp.com | 359 |
| 49 | mx76.mb1p.com | 358 |
| 50 | webmail2.sitebuildit.com | 358 |
| 51 | mailgw.nic.in | 349 |
| 52 | backupmx.hostmaster.sk | 339 |
| 53 | mx1d10.thinline.cz | 326 |
| 54 | mx1b20.thinline.cz | 324 |
| 55 | mx07.register.com | 318 |
| 56 | mx.usa.net | 305 |
| 57 | ntvirus.url.com.tw | 303 |
| 58 | ntvirus2.url.com.tw | 303 |
| 59 | mail.global.frontbridge.com | 298 |
| 60 | mx1.servage.net | 286 |
| 61 | mx2.servage.net | 282 |
| 62 | mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk | 280 |
| 63 | mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk | 280 |
| 64 | smtp-avas.seeweb.it | 280 |
| 65 | webmail.mail.maxns.net | 279 |
| 66 | mx2.firstfind.nl | 279 |
| 67 | mx1.firstfind.nl | 277 |
| 68 | igw5002.site4now.net | 275 |
| 69 | mx4.name.com | 269 |
| 70 | mx5.name.com | 268 |
| 71 | mx6.name.com | 268 |
| 72 | mx3.name.com | 267 |
| 73 | mx8.name.com | 267 |
| 74 | mx7.name.com | 267 |
| 75 | mx1.cleanmx.pt | 265 |
| 76 | mx2.cleanmx.pt | 265 |
| 77 | mail2.infomart2000.com | 264 |
| 78 | relay1.exohosting.sk | 262 |
| 79 | relay.exohosting.sk | 259 |
| 80 | relay2.dnsserver.eu | 259 |
| 81 | relay3.dnsserver.eu | 256 |
| 82 | mx364.umbler.com | 250 |
| 83 | mx240.umbler.co.uk | 250 |
| 84 | mailfilter1.mijndomein.nl | 248 |
| 85 | mailfilter2.mijndomein.nl | 248 |
| 86 | mx2.savana.cz | 247 |
| 87 | mx1.savana.cz | 246 |
| 88 | mx1.zone.eu | 245 |
| 89 | mx2.zone.eu | 243 |
| 90 | s.mail.dcsaas.net | 243 |
| 91 | mx1.supremebox.com | 242 |
| 92 | mx2.supremebox.com | 241 |
| 93 | inbound-smtp.cp.blacknight.com | 241 |
| 94 | mx.maxns.net | 235 |
| 95 | nan | 232 |
| 96 | smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it | 231 |
| 97 | mx02.easyname.eu | 227 |
| 98 | mx1.dnsmadeeasy.com | 225 |
| 99 | mx01.easyname.eu | 223 |
| 100 | mail-pt.securemail.pro | 223 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | bluehost.com | 10 754 |
| 2 | cmail1.com | 2 181 |
| 3 | outlook.com | 2 117 |
| 4 | _spf.websupport.sk | 1 768 |
| 5 | hostmonster.com | 1 567 |
| 6 | spf.hostmar.com | 1 363 |
| 7 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 1 356 |
| 8 | infusionmail.com | 1 354 |
| 9 | spf.whservidor.com | 1 258 |
| 10 | spf.linuxpl.com | 1 193 |
| 11 | _spf.uni5.net | 1 066 |
| 12 | nicmail.ru | 949 |
| 13 | beget.ru | 901 |
| 14 | spf.tld.pl | 893 |
| 15 | icpbounce.com | 875 |
| 16 | hotmail.com | 862 |
| 17 | spf.webapps.net | 803 |
| 18 | justhost.com | 766 |
| 19 | gridhost.co.uk | 738 |
| 20 | _spf.fastmail.gr | 722 |
| 21 | e2ma.net | 698 |
| 22 | _spf.emfwd.name-services.com | 692 |
| 23 | reflexion.net | 687 |
| 24 | _spf.zenbox.pl | 673 |
| 25 | spf.autopilothq.com | 664 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | spf1.auinmeio.com.br | 657 |
| 27 | spf2.auinmeio.com.br | 653 |
| 28 | msgfocus.com | 651 |
| 29 | spf.serveriai.lt | 647 |
| 30 | _spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com | 636 |
| 31 | mailcontrol.com | 635 |
| 32 | spf.nl2go.com | 630 |
| 33 | sharepointonline.com | 630 |
| 34 | spf.hes.trendmicro.com | 629 |
| 35 | mxlogic.net | 606 |
| 36 | _spf.anpdm.com | 602 |
| 37 | _spfcls.natrohost.com | 598 |
| 38 | _spf.heteml.jp | 596 |
| 39 | _netblockshalon.natrohost.com | 577 |
| 40 | salesforce.com | 559 |
| 41 | appriver.com | 557 |
| 42 | google.com | 556 |
| 43 | _spf.domeneshop.no | 550 |
| 44 | spf.hekko.pl | 545 |
| 45 | turbo-smtp.com | 502 |
| 46 | _spf.transip.email | 489 |
| 47 | spf.protection.3dcart.com | 487 |
| 48 | smtp.groovehq.com | 477 |
| 49 | outboundmail.convio.net | 476 |
| 50 | _spf.admincontrolpanel.com | 468 |
| 51 | gmail.com | 467 |
| 52 | _spf.zdsys.com | 465 |
| 53 | spf.masterbase.com | 464 |
| 54 | smtp1.uservoice.com | 459 |
| 55 | _spf.srv.cat | 458 |
| 56 | bmsend.com | 454 |
| 57 | worldsecuresystems.com | 445 |
| 58 | spf.smartemailing.cz | 435 |
| 59 | _spf.act-on.net | 412 |
| 60 | spf.secure.ne.jp | 393 |
| 61 | email-od.com | 380 |
| 62 | spf.zixsmbhosted.com | 380 |
| 63 | ncfp.asia | 378 |
| 64 | spf.blacknight.ie | 375 |
| 65 | _spf.hoster.by | 365 |
| 66 | spf.dondominio.com | 365 |
| 67 | spf.hostedmail.net.au | 359 |
| 68 | spf.mailcluster.com.au | 355 |
| 69 | spf.digitalinsight.com | 353 |
| 70 | mh.blackboard.com | 347 |
| 71 | _spf.nameserver.sk | 346 |
| 72 | email.freshservice.com | 340 |
| 73 | datadrivenemail.com | 339 |
| 74 | spf.mailengine1.com | 336 |
| 75 | spf.messaging.microsoft.com | 336 |
| 76 | jangomail.com | 330 |
| 77 | _mail.dhosting.pl | 329 |
| 78 | spf.w4ymail.at | 327 |
| 79 | spf.mtaroutes.com | 325 |
| 80 | custspf.register.com | 324 |
| 81 | pepipost.net | 320 |
| 82 | spf.dominioabsoluto.net | 318 |
| 83 | mailanyone.net | 315 |
| 84 | send.aweber.com | 314 |
| 85 | spf.virtualtarget.com.br | 313 |
| 86 | _spf.embluemail.com | 311 |
| 87 | spf.totaalholding.nl | 309 |
| 88 | netcore.co.in | 308 |
| 89 | emsmtp.com | 302 |
| 90 | _senderspf.copernica.com | 296 |
| 91 | spf.maropost.com | 296 |
| 92 | spf.263xmail.com | 290 |
| 93 | _spf.daum.net | 290 |
| 94 | _spf.syrahost.com | 290 |
| 95 | smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg | 284 |
| 96 | spf.hosts.co.uk | 283 |
| 97 | _spf.emailmkt.correio.ws | 282 |
| 98 | _spf.th.seeweb.it | 280 |
| 99 | smtproutes.com | 279 |
| 100 | eblastengine.com | 278 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.