Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2018-08-01.

1 194 344
Domains with MX
772 448
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
1 194 344
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted436 38736.54%
2Google Workspace199 92416.74%
3Unknown / Other112 7199.44%
4Microsoft 36589 0947.46%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)58 3974.89%
6GoDaddy40 6633.4%
7Generic / unmatched (mail.*)24 3872.04%
8Yandex 36023 4201.96%
9OVH Mail12 1321.02%
10Zoho Mail11 9261.0%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Rackspace Email10 0680.84%
12Mimecast9 3420.78%
13QQ Mail (Tencent)7 8650.66%
14SpamExperts (SolarWinds)7 1810.6%
15Namecheap Email Forwarding7 1710.6%
161&1 IONOS6 2420.52%
17Proofpoint6 2020.52%
18Symantec MessageLabs6 0170.5%
19Locaweb (BR)5 6680.47%
20Beget (RU)5 0770.43%
21DreamHost4 9710.42%
22Strato (DE)4 9060.41%
23Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)4 7710.4%
24All-Inkl (DE)4 5210.38%
25Barracuda4 1100.34%
26ISPGateway (DE)4 0450.34%
27One.com mailpod3 3120.28%
28Generic / unmatched (smtp.*)3 2060.27%
29Gandi Mail3 0530.26%
30Mail.ru for Business2 9670.25%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
16.64%
198 709 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
65 569
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
36.55%
436 523 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1SendGrid (Twilio)38 9875.05%
2Mailchimp35 3384.57%
3Zendesk31 5394.08%
4Mandrill31 3824.06%
5Mailgun17 8892.32%
6Amazon SES12 7491.65%
7Namecheap Forwarding7 5560.98%
8Mimecast6 6260.86%
9Mailjet (Sinch)6 3160.82%
10Locaweb (BR)6 2640.81%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11SpamExperts (SolarWinds)5 4500.71%
12MailChannels4 6200.6%
13SparkPost4 3570.56%
14Postmark4 1670.54%
15Marketo (Adobe)4 0880.53%
16Elastic Email3 5170.46%
17Salesforce3 3950.44%
18Unisender (RU)2 2890.3%
19Help Scout2 1500.28%
20MailHostBox1 8940.25%
21SMTP2GO1 7700.23%
22Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)1 7050.22%
23Constant Contact1 5730.2%
24Freshdesk1 5230.2%
25Barracuda Essentials1 4440.19%
26KingHost (BR)1 4320.19%
27Exclaimer (signatures)1 4260.18%
28A Random Server (parking)1 2650.16%
29AuthSMTP1 2190.16%
30MailerSend1 2010.16%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)5 3710.7%
2BigCommerce2 2190.29%
3Trustpilot1 9940.26%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 4580.19%
5Shopify1 1950.15%
6Zendesk1 0730.14%
7ClickDimensions1 0390.13%
8CodeTwo Email Signatures 3658480.11%
9Qualtrics8180.11%
10NetSuite (Oracle)7450.1%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11PayPal Braintree7410.1%
12Firebase (Google)3830.05%
13Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)3120.04%
14ConnectWise3020.04%
15Greenhouse2880.04%
16One.com (DK hosting)2780.04%
17Freshsales (Freshworks)2530.03%
18KnowBe42410.03%
19RetailCRM2350.03%
20Autotask (ConnectWise)2250.03%
21Shoptet2150.03%
22Recurly1800.02%
23SchoolMessenger1730.02%
24Docebo (LMS)1600.02%
25Gannett (USA Today)1150.01%
26pair Networks1080.01%
27Sage Intacct1080.01%
28Brightspace (D2L)910.01%
29SurveyMonkey660.01%
30Squarespace480.01%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▼ -46.78%30d ago▼ -46.00%90d ago▼ -45.15%1y ago▼ -42.73%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx01.1and1.com4 621
2mx00.1and1.com4 598
3p.webcom.ctmail.com3 337
4mx01.1and1.co.uk2 253
5mx00.1and1.co.uk2 234
6mx01.1and1.es2 093
7mx00.1and1.es2 081
8mx1.netsolmail.net2 055
9smx2.web-hosting.com1 901
10mx01.1and1.fr1 804
11smx1.web-hosting.com1 795
12smx3.web-hosting.com1 794
13mx00.1and1.fr1 792
14mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net1 776
15mx1.jimdo.com1 397
16mx2.jimdo.com1 397
17asp.reflexion.net1 109
18mx01.schlund.de1 094
19mx00.schlund.de1 088
20mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk985
21mx-100.reflexion.net877
22mx-110.reflexion.net852
23mx7.webfaction.com842
24mx8.webfaction.com838
25mx9.webfaction.com820
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mail.net4india.com570
27localhost.mx.*559
28mx3.volusion.com504
29mx4.volusion.com502
30mx-backup.serveriai.lt489
31sitemail.everyone.net470
32smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net465
33mx.unoeuro.com461
34smtp-fwd.wordpress.com456
35in.hes.trendmicro.eu434
36relay1.netnames.net426
37relay2.netnames.net426
38inbound.registeredsite.com423
39mail.blogsky.com415
40mailin.mx-hub.sk384
41mailin.mx-hub.eu383
42mailin.mx-hub.cz382
43posta3.mediacenter.hu366
44posta4.mediacenter.hu366
45posta2.mediacenter.hu365
46posta.mediacenter.hu361
47posta5.mediacenter.hu361
48mx76.m2bp.com359
49mx76.mb1p.com358
50webmail2.sitebuildit.com358
51mailgw.nic.in349
52backupmx.hostmaster.sk339
53mx1d10.thinline.cz326
54mx1b20.thinline.cz324
55mx07.register.com318
56mx.usa.net305
57ntvirus.url.com.tw303
58ntvirus2.url.com.tw303
59mail.global.frontbridge.com298
60mx1.servage.net286
61mx2.servage.net282
62mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk280
63mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk280
64smtp-avas.seeweb.it280
65webmail.mail.maxns.net279
66mx2.firstfind.nl279
67mx1.firstfind.nl277
68igw5002.site4now.net275
69mx4.name.com269
70mx5.name.com268
71mx6.name.com268
72mx3.name.com267
73mx8.name.com267
74mx7.name.com267
75mx1.cleanmx.pt265
76mx2.cleanmx.pt265
77mail2.infomart2000.com264
78relay1.exohosting.sk262
79relay.exohosting.sk259
80relay2.dnsserver.eu259
81relay3.dnsserver.eu256
82mx364.umbler.com250
83mx240.umbler.co.uk250
84mailfilter1.mijndomein.nl248
85mailfilter2.mijndomein.nl248
86mx2.savana.cz247
87mx1.savana.cz246
88mx1.zone.eu245
89mx2.zone.eu243
90s.mail.dcsaas.net243
91mx1.supremebox.com242
92mx2.supremebox.com241
93inbound-smtp.cp.blacknight.com241
94mx.maxns.net235
95nan232
96smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it231
97mx02.easyname.eu227
98mx1.dnsmadeeasy.com225
99mx01.easyname.eu223
100mail-pt.securemail.pro223

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com10 754
2cmail1.com2 181
3outlook.com2 117
4_spf.websupport.sk1 768
5hostmonster.com1 567
6spf.hostmar.com1 363
7spf.mail.intercom.io1 356
8infusionmail.com1 354
9spf.whservidor.com1 258
10spf.linuxpl.com1 193
11_spf.uni5.net1 066
12nicmail.ru949
13beget.ru901
14spf.tld.pl893
15icpbounce.com875
16hotmail.com862
17spf.webapps.net803
18justhost.com766
19gridhost.co.uk738
20_spf.fastmail.gr722
21e2ma.net698
22_spf.emfwd.name-services.com692
23reflexion.net687
24_spf.zenbox.pl673
25spf.autopilothq.com664
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf1.auinmeio.com.br657
27spf2.auinmeio.com.br653
28msgfocus.com651
29spf.serveriai.lt647
30_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com636
31mailcontrol.com635
32spf.nl2go.com630
33sharepointonline.com630
34spf.hes.trendmicro.com629
35mxlogic.net606
36_spf.anpdm.com602
37_spfcls.natrohost.com598
38_spf.heteml.jp596
39_netblockshalon.natrohost.com577
40salesforce.com559
41appriver.com557
42google.com556
43_spf.domeneshop.no550
44spf.hekko.pl545
45turbo-smtp.com502
46_spf.transip.email489
47spf.protection.3dcart.com487
48smtp.groovehq.com477
49outboundmail.convio.net476
50_spf.admincontrolpanel.com468
51gmail.com467
52_spf.zdsys.com465
53spf.masterbase.com464
54smtp1.uservoice.com459
55_spf.srv.cat458
56bmsend.com454
57worldsecuresystems.com445
58spf.smartemailing.cz435
59_spf.act-on.net412
60spf.secure.ne.jp393
61email-od.com380
62spf.zixsmbhosted.com380
63ncfp.asia378
64spf.blacknight.ie375
65_spf.hoster.by365
66spf.dondominio.com365
67spf.hostedmail.net.au359
68spf.mailcluster.com.au355
69spf.digitalinsight.com353
70mh.blackboard.com347
71_spf.nameserver.sk346
72email.freshservice.com340
73datadrivenemail.com339
74spf.mailengine1.com336
75spf.messaging.microsoft.com336
76jangomail.com330
77_mail.dhosting.pl329
78spf.w4ymail.at327
79spf.mtaroutes.com325
80custspf.register.com324
81pepipost.net320
82spf.dominioabsoluto.net318
83mailanyone.net315
84send.aweber.com314
85spf.virtualtarget.com.br313
86_spf.embluemail.com311
87spf.totaalholding.nl309
88netcore.co.in308
89emsmtp.com302
90_senderspf.copernica.com296
91spf.maropost.com296
92spf.263xmail.com290
93_spf.daum.net290
94_spf.syrahost.com290
95smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg284
96spf.hosts.co.uk283
97_spf.emailmkt.correio.ws282
98_spf.th.seeweb.it280
99smtproutes.com279
100eblastengine.com278

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2018-08-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T14:01:39Z.