Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2018-07-01.

1 165 617
Domains with MX
745 554
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
1 165 617
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted433 61437.2%
2Google Workspace193 56016.61%
3Unknown / Other106 9789.18%
4Microsoft 36581 8457.02%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)56 4374.84%
6GoDaddy45 4473.9%
7Yandex 36023 8542.05%
8Generic / unmatched (mail.*)23 5672.02%
9Zoho Mail12 0321.03%
10OVH Mail11 6911.0%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Rackspace Email10 1030.87%
12Mimecast8 4770.73%
13Namecheap Email Forwarding8 1310.7%
14QQ Mail (Tencent)7 5410.65%
15SpamExperts (SolarWinds)7 3300.63%
16Proofpoint5 6580.49%
171&1 IONOS5 4380.47%
18Symantec MessageLabs5 4280.47%
19Beget (RU)5 4260.47%
20DreamHost5 3270.46%
21Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)5 0140.43%
22Strato (DE)4 4100.38%
23All-Inkl (DE)4 0880.35%
24Locaweb (BR)4 0680.35%
25Barracuda3 8490.33%
26ISPGateway (DE)3 6370.31%
27Mail.ru for Business3 0670.26%
28Gandi Mail3 0630.26%
29One.com mailpod3 0520.26%
30Generic / unmatched (smtp.*)3 0340.26%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
16.3%
190 016 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
62 750
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
37.21%
433 751 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1SendGrid (Twilio)43 3525.81%
2Zendesk36 5634.9%
3Mailchimp32 5074.36%
4Mandrill29 5373.96%
5Mailgun17 1592.3%
6Amazon SES11 9941.61%
7Namecheap Forwarding8 6111.15%
8Mimecast5 9050.79%
9Mailjet (Sinch)5 8230.78%
10SpamExperts (SolarWinds)5 3140.71%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11MailChannels4 7520.64%
12Locaweb (BR)4 4770.6%
13SparkPost4 0910.55%
14Postmark4 0180.54%
15Marketo (Adobe)3 8010.51%
16Elastic Email3 2790.44%
17Salesforce3 0350.41%
18Unisender (RU)2 1970.29%
19MailHostBox2 1890.29%
20Help Scout1 9890.27%
21SMTP2GO1 6660.22%
22Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)1 5210.2%
23Constant Contact1 4620.2%
24A Random Server (parking)1 3730.18%
25Freshdesk1 3590.18%
26Barracuda Essentials1 2730.17%
27AuthSMTP1 1900.16%
28Exclaimer (signatures)1 1640.16%
29MailerSend1 1200.15%
30SuperCP1 0930.15%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)4 7330.63%
2BigCommerce2 1360.29%
3Trustpilot1 7810.24%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 3700.18%
5Shopify1 0530.14%
6Zendesk1 0350.14%
7ClickDimensions9130.12%
8Qualtrics7640.1%
9CodeTwo Email Signatures 3657460.1%
10PayPal Braintree7130.1%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle)7130.1%
12Firebase (Google)3500.05%
13Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)2600.03%
14Greenhouse2580.03%
15RetailCRM2500.03%
16ConnectWise2390.03%
17One.com (DK hosting)2380.03%
18Freshsales (Freshworks)2190.03%
19KnowBe42090.03%
20Autotask (ConnectWise)2030.03%
21Recurly1800.02%
22Shoptet1590.02%
23Docebo (LMS)1390.02%
24SchoolMessenger1280.02%
25Gannett (USA Today)1160.02%
26pair Networks1060.01%
27Sage Intacct960.01%
28Brightspace (D2L)820.01%
29SurveyMonkey580.01%
30DocuSign370.0%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▼ -46.78%30d ago▼ -46.00%90d ago▼ -45.15%1y ago▼ -42.73%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx01.1and1.com5 134
2mx00.1and1.com5 112
3p.webcom.ctmail.com3 467
4smx2.web-hosting.com2 215
5mx1.netsolmail.net2 187
6smx1.web-hosting.com2 061
7smx3.web-hosting.com2 061
8mx01.1and1.es1 997
9mx00.1and1.es1 990
10mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net1 978
11mx01.1and1.co.uk1 954
12mx00.1and1.co.uk1 932
13mx01.1and1.fr1 774
14mx00.1and1.fr1 758
15mx1.jimdo.com1 176
16mx2.jimdo.com1 176
17asp.reflexion.net1 077
18mx00.schlund.de1 001
19mx01.schlund.de1 000
20mx7.webfaction.com886
21mx8.webfaction.com882
22mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk880
23mx9.webfaction.com871
24mx-100.reflexion.net865
25mx-110.reflexion.net830
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26localhost737
27mail.net4india.com660
28mx-backup.serveriai.lt580
29sitemail.everyone.net529
30mx3.volusion.com513
31mx4.volusion.com513
32smtp-fwd.wordpress.com507
33inbound.registeredsite.com492
34mx76.mb1p.com436
35mx76.m2bp.com436
36webmail2.sitebuildit.com434
37relay1.netnames.net411
38relay2.netnames.net409
39smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net406
40mx.unoeuro.com398
41mx.usa.net359
42in.hes.trendmicro.eu352
43posta2.mediacenter.hu345
44posta4.mediacenter.hu345
45posta3.mediacenter.hu344
46posta.mediacenter.hu343
47posta5.mediacenter.hu338
48mailgw.nic.in330
49mx07.register.com316
50mx1.servage.net313
51mx2.servage.net306
52mail.blogsky.com300
53mail.global.frontbridge.com295
54mailin.mx-hub.cz290
55mailin.mx-hub.eu290
56mailin.mx-hub.sk290
57mx1d10.thinline.cz285
58mx1b20.thinline.cz284
59webmail.mail.maxns.net282
60mx.maxns.net276
61igw5002.site4now.net276
62backupmx.hostmaster.sk270
63mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk260
64mx.ct.mbox.net260
65ntvirus.url.com.tw259
66mail2.infomart2000.com259
67ntvirus2.url.com.tw258
68smtp-avas.seeweb.it257
69mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk256
70smx4.web-hosting.com253
71mx8.name.com249
72mx4.name.com248
73mx5.name.com247
74mx6.name.com247
75mx3.name.com247
76mx7.name.com246
77mx2.savana.cz241
78mx1.supremebox.com240
79mx2.supremebox.com238
80mx1.savana.cz235
81mx1.zone.eu230
82relay1.exohosting.sk229
83mx.orangegeek.net228
84mx2.zone.eu228
85relay2.dnsserver.eu228
86relay.exohosting.sk226
87relay3.dnsserver.eu225
88mx1.dnsmadeeasy.com216
89altmx2.orangegeek.net214
90altmx3.orangegeek.net213
91mx.online.net213
92mx-cache.online.net212
93mx1.premium.jfg-networks.net211
94mx2.premium.jfg-networks.net211
95mx2.dnsmadeeasy.com210
96mx-in01.natrohost.com206
97mx-in01b.natrohost.com206
98nan202
99mx1.cleanmx.pt201
100mx2.firstfind.nl200

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com11 860
2cmail1.com2 070
3outlook.com1 908
4hostmonster.com1 724
5_spf.websupport.sk1 539
6spf.mail.intercom.io1 293
7infusionmail.com1 290
8spf.hostmar.com1 129
9spf.linuxpl.com1 045
10beget.ru999
11nicmail.ru967
12spf.whservidor.com950
13_spf.fastmail.gr888
14hotmail.com860
15icpbounce.com839
16justhost.com791
17spf.tld.pl769
18spf.serveriai.lt742
19_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com729
20_spf.emfwd.name-services.com718
21_spf.uni5.net694
22reflexion.net663
23spf.webapps.net652
24e2ma.net650
25_spf.zenbox.pl626
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26gridhost.co.uk601
27spf.autopilothq.com594
28mxlogic.net590
29_spfcls.natrohost.com585
30sharepointonline.com582
31msgfocus.com567
32spf1.auinmeio.com.br566
33_netblockshalon.natrohost.com564
34spf2.auinmeio.com.br561
35mailcontrol.com553
36_spf.anpdm.com545
37google.com537
38salesforce.com527
39spf.hes.trendmicro.com513
40spf.nl2go.com502
41spf.hekko.pl485
42_spf.zdsys.com480
43turbo-smtp.com479
44outboundmail.convio.net476
45appriver.com475
46worldsecuresystems.com471
47spf.protection.3dcart.com471
48_spf.domeneshop.no467
49gmail.com461
50spf.hostedmail.net.au450
51smtp1.uservoice.com447
52spf.masterbase.com436
53_spf.heteml.jp423
54smtp.groovehq.com421
55bmsend.com414
56spf.mailcluster.com.au413
57_spf.srv.cat400
58_spf.hoster.by387
59_spf.transip.email374
60spf.secure.ne.jp369
61_spf.act-on.net367
62ncfp.asia367
63spf.zixsmbhosted.com366
64custspf.register.com353
65smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg349
66spf.smartemailing.cz341
67mh.blackboard.com339
68_spf.syrahost.com338
69email-od.com337
70_spf.admincontrolpanel.com334
71spf.dondominio.com331
72spf.digitalinsight.com329
73spf.mailengine1.com326
74spf.messaging.microsoft.com325
75spf.w4ymail.at320
76pepipost.net320
77datadrivenemail.com318
78jangomail.com317
79netcore.co.in317
80spf.blacknight.ie313
81mailanyone.net307
82send.aweber.com305
83rhostbh.com300
84relays.webhost-mail.com299
85spf.virtualtarget.com.br286
86eblastengine.com284
87emsmtp.com283
88spf.mtaroutes.com281
89spf.dominioabsoluto.net281
90spf.raiolanetworks.com279
91spf.maropost.com278
92_spf.embluemail.com276
93spf.usa.net275
94email.freshservice.com275
95md02.com271
96rnmk.com270
97_mail.dhosting.pl267
98_spf.turhost.com267
99spf.clearslide.com265
100smtproutes.com263

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2018-07-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T14:06:50Z.