Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2018-05-01.

1 168 881
Domains with MX
732 275
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
1 168 881
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted436 87537.38%
2Google Workspace186 95915.99%
3Unknown / Other111 9649.58%
4Microsoft 36579 3236.79%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)60 4385.17%
6GoDaddy42 5693.64%
7Generic / unmatched (mail.*)25 3212.17%
8Yandex 36022 3741.91%
9OVH Mail14 3751.23%
10Zoho Mail10 9130.93%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Rackspace Email9 4940.81%
12Mimecast8 1150.69%
13Namecheap Email Forwarding7 7370.66%
14SpamExperts (SolarWinds)7 0420.6%
151&1 IONOS6 9190.59%
16QQ Mail (Tencent)6 5700.56%
17Symantec MessageLabs5 6760.49%
18Strato (DE)5 6370.48%
19DreamHost5 3670.46%
20Proofpoint5 3610.46%
21Beget (RU)5 2350.45%
22All-Inkl (DE)5 0120.43%
23Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)4 7000.4%
24ISPGateway (DE)4 4730.38%
25Locaweb (BR)3 9340.34%
26Gandi Mail3 5360.3%
27One.com mailpod3 5260.3%
28Barracuda3 4970.3%
29Generic / unmatched (smtp.*)3 1190.27%
30Mail.ru for Business2 8240.24%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
17.18%
200 842 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
64 348
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
37.39%
437 009 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1SendGrid (Twilio)42 2685.77%
2Zendesk35 1794.8%
3Mailchimp30 9594.23%
4Mandrill29 8514.08%
5Mailgun16 4282.24%
6Amazon SES11 7521.6%
7Namecheap Forwarding8 2181.12%
8Mailjet (Sinch)6 0890.83%
9Mimecast5 5610.76%
10MailChannels5 4830.75%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11SpamExperts (SolarWinds)4 7520.65%
12Locaweb (BR)4 3890.6%
13SparkPost4 2820.58%
14Postmark4 2740.58%
15Marketo (Adobe)3 5270.48%
16Elastic Email3 1140.43%
17Salesforce2 7630.38%
18Unisender (RU)1 9990.27%
19Help Scout1 9530.27%
20MailHostBox1 9380.26%
21Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)1 5270.21%
22SMTP2GO1 5080.21%
23Constant Contact1 4530.2%
24Freshdesk1 3670.19%
25A Random Server (parking)1 3600.19%
26Exclaimer (signatures)1 2050.16%
27AuthSMTP1 1980.16%
28Barracuda Essentials1 1330.15%
29MailerSend1 0580.14%
30SuperCP1 0550.14%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)4 3370.59%
2BigCommerce2 0110.27%
3Trustpilot1 9460.27%
4Statuspage (Atlassian)1 2800.17%
5Zendesk1 0610.14%
6Shopify9320.13%
7ClickDimensions8600.12%
8Qualtrics7200.1%
9PayPal Braintree6930.09%
10CodeTwo Email Signatures 3656630.09%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle)6120.08%
12Firebase (Google)3490.05%
13One.com (DK hosting)2770.04%
14Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)2480.03%
15ConnectWise2260.03%
16Greenhouse2170.03%
17Freshsales (Freshworks)2120.03%
18SchoolMessenger2090.03%
19RetailCRM1990.03%
20Recurly1820.02%
21Autotask (ConnectWise)1750.02%
22KnowBe41680.02%
23Shoptet1660.02%
24Docebo (LMS)1410.02%
25pair Networks1140.02%
26Gannett (USA Today)1090.01%
27Brightspace (D2L)920.01%
28Sage Intacct730.01%
29SurveyMonkey580.01%
30DocuSign350.0%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▼ -46.78%30d ago▼ -46.00%90d ago▼ -45.15%1y ago▼ -42.73%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx01.1and1.com4 714
2mx00.1and1.com4 696
3p.webcom.ctmail.com3 363
4mx01.1and1.es2 736
5mx00.1and1.es2 717
6mx01.1and1.co.uk2 583
7mx00.1and1.co.uk2 560
8mx01.1and1.fr2 378
9mx00.1and1.fr2 361
10smx2.web-hosting.com2 085
11mx1.netsolmail.net2 005
12smx3.web-hosting.com1 928
13smx1.web-hosting.com1 927
14mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net1 900
15mx1.jimdo.com1 477
16mx2.jimdo.com1 477
17mx01.schlund.de1 295
18mx00.schlund.de1 291
19mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk1 182
20asp.reflexion.net976
21mx7.webfaction.com933
22mx8.webfaction.com928
23mx9.webfaction.com916
24mx-100.reflexion.net778
25localhost770
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx-110.reflexion.net749
27mx-backup.serveriai.lt599
28mail.net4india.com573
29smtp-fwd.wordpress.com516
30sitemail.everyone.net511
31relay2.netnames.net511
32relay1.netnames.net509
33webmail2.sitebuildit.com479
34mx4.volusion.com471
35mx3.volusion.com470
36inbound.registeredsite.com443
37posta2.mediacenter.hu435
38posta3.mediacenter.hu435
39posta4.mediacenter.hu435
40posta.mediacenter.hu431
41mx76.mb1p.com430
42mx76.m2bp.com430
43mx.unoeuro.com427
44posta5.mediacenter.hu426
45mail.blogsky.com401
46smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net399
47in.hes.trendmicro.eu398
48ntvirus2.url.com.tw375
49ntvirus.url.com.tw374
50mailin.mx-hub.sk368
51mailin.mx-hub.eu367
52mailin.mx-hub.cz365
53mx1.servage.net349
54mx2.servage.net346
55mx1d10.thinline.cz336
56mx1b20.thinline.cz336
57mail.global.frontbridge.com322
58mailgw.nic.in317
59mx.maxns.net316
60webmail.mail.maxns.net315
61mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk310
62mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk310
63backupmx.hostmaster.sk308
64mx07.register.com298
65mx.usa.net293
66smtp-avas.seeweb.it281
67mail-fr.securemail.pro276
68mx2.firstfind.nl271
69mx.online.net269
70mx-cache.online.net269
71mx1.firstfind.nl269
72mx1.cleanmx.pt263
73mx2.cleanmx.pt260
74igw5002.site4now.net260
75mail2.infomart2000.com258
76smx4.web-hosting.com253
77mx1.dnsmadeeasy.com251
78mx1.premium.jfg-networks.net248
79mx2.premium.jfg-networks.net248
80mx2.dnsmadeeasy.com243
81mx2.savana.cz241
82mx.orangegeek.net241
83mx1.savana.cz240
84inbound-smtp.cp.blacknight.com240
85mx4.name.com239
86mx8.name.com239
87mx3.name.com238
88mx5.name.com237
89mx6.name.com236
90mx7.name.com235
91smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it235
92relay.exohosting.sk234
93relay1.exohosting.sk233
94relay2.dnsserver.eu233
95mx1.supremebox.com231
96relay3.dnsserver.eu231
97mailfilter2.mijndomein.nl230
98mailfilter1.mijndomein.nl229
99mx2.supremebox.com228
100mx3.dnsmadeeasy.com228

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com11 458
2cmail1.com2 367
3outlook.com2 075
4hostmonster.com1 665
5_spf.websupport.sk1 581
6spf.mail.intercom.io1 470
7infusionmail.com1 212
8spf.linuxpl.com1 181
9spf.hostmar.com1 148
10beget.ru1 031
11spf.whservidor.com968
12nicmail.ru898
13hotmail.com853
14gridhost.co.uk843
15justhost.com840
16icpbounce.com831
17spf.tld.pl797
18_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com772
19spf.serveriai.lt754
20spf.webapps.net745
21_spf.emfwd.name-services.com718
22_spf.fastmail.gr693
23_spf.uni5.net680
24sharepointonline.com642
25mxlogic.net633
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26msgfocus.com616
27_spf.zenbox.pl599
28e2ma.net591
29reflexion.net584
30_spf.srv.cat568
31_spf.anpdm.com543
32spf.autopilothq.com540
33_spf.domeneshop.no531
34spf1.auinmeio.com.br530
35spf2.auinmeio.com.br529
36salesforce.com527
37mailcontrol.com527
38_spfcls.natrohost.com526
39google.com523
40spf.hes.trendmicro.com514
41spf.hekko.pl513
42_netblockshalon.natrohost.com511
43gmail.com501
44spf.nl2go.com501
45outboundmail.convio.net485
46worldsecuresystems.com483
47turbo-smtp.com463
48_spf.zdsys.com462
49_spf.transip.email448
50spf.dondominio.com448
51smtp1.uservoice.com447
52smtp.groovehq.com443
53spf.protection.3dcart.com440
54spf.masterbase.com419
55_spf.hoster.by388
56bmsend.com385
57appriver.com383
58spf.blacknight.ie382
59_spf.heteml.jp368
60spf.hostedmail.net.au359
61spf.w4ymail.at356
62spf.smartemailing.cz355
63mh.blackboard.com354
64spf.raiolanetworks.com351
65_spf.act-on.net339
66spf.messaging.microsoft.com337
67spf.mailcluster.com.au335
68spf.dominioabsoluto.net333
69spf.hosts.co.uk333
70smtproutes.com332
71spf.secure.ne.jp331
72jangomail.com331
73pepipost.net329
74_spf.nameserver.sk328
75email-od.com328
76datadrivenemail.com325
77_spf.loading.es321
78ncfp.asia319
79custspf.register.com318
80smtpout.com316
81spf.totaalholding.nl313
82spf.mailengine1.com311
83eblastengine.com309
84emsmtp.com299
85spf.zixsmbhosted.com298
86relays.webhost-mail.com298
87send.aweber.com297
88mailanyone.net296
89netcore.co.in295
90_mail.dhosting.pl294
91spf.virtualtarget.com.br286
92_spf.admincontrolpanel.com285
93_spf.th.seeweb.it284
94_senderspf.copernica.com276
95smtp-out.spf.superhosting.bg272
96spf.maropost.com269
97email.freshservice.com268
98spf.byte.nl265
99spf.comendosystems.com264
100_spf.syrahost.com264

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2018-05-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T14:17:30Z.