Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2018-02-01.
What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.
What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail —
derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the
receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc.
"Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames
we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-Hosted | 431 923 | 36.12% |
| 2 | Google Workspace | 191 797 | 16.04% |
| 3 | Unknown / Other | 119 341 | 9.98% |
| 4 | Microsoft 365 | 85 194 | 7.13% |
| 5 | Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) | 65 649 | 5.49% |
| 6 | GoDaddy | 42 096 | 3.52% |
| 7 | Generic / unmatched (mail.*) | 26 012 | 2.18% |
| 8 | Yandex 360 | 21 567 | 1.8% |
| 9 | OVH Mail | 16 758 | 1.4% |
| 10 | Zoho Mail | 10 307 | 0.86% |
| # | Mailbox provider | Domains | Share of MX-having domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Rackspace Email | 10 003 | 0.84% |
| 12 | Mimecast | 9 096 | 0.76% |
| 13 | 1&1 IONOS | 8 681 | 0.73% |
| 14 | QQ Mail (Tencent) | 7 728 | 0.65% |
| 15 | Namecheap Email Forwarding | 7 325 | 0.61% |
| 16 | Symantec MessageLabs | 6 746 | 0.56% |
| 17 | Strato (DE) | 6 710 | 0.56% |
| 18 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 6 663 | 0.56% |
| 19 | All-Inkl (DE) | 6 071 | 0.51% |
| 20 | ISPGateway (DE) | 5 563 | 0.47% |
| 21 | Proofpoint | 5 382 | 0.45% |
| 22 | DreamHost | 4 889 | 0.41% |
| 23 | Beget (RU) | 4 693 | 0.39% |
| 24 | Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) | 4 365 | 0.37% |
| 25 | Gandi Mail | 4 055 | 0.34% |
| 26 | Barracuda | 3 584 | 0.3% |
| 27 | One.com mailpod | 3 489 | 0.29% |
| 28 | Generic / unmatched (smtp.*) | 3 404 | 0.28% |
| 29 | Locaweb (BR) | 3 362 | 0.28% |
| 30 | Mail.ru for Business | 2 712 | 0.23% |
What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.
What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SendGrid (Twilio) | 35 258 | 4.86% |
| 2 | Mandrill | 32 285 | 4.45% |
| 3 | Mailchimp | 30 545 | 4.21% |
| 4 | Zendesk | 27 696 | 3.82% |
| 5 | Mailgun | 17 045 | 2.35% |
| 6 | Amazon SES | 11 859 | 1.64% |
| 7 | Namecheap Forwarding | 7 796 | 1.08% |
| 8 | Mailjet (Sinch) | 6 587 | 0.91% |
| 9 | Mimecast | 5 961 | 0.82% |
| 10 | MailChannels | 4 896 | 0.68% |
| # | ESP | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Postmark | 4 682 | 0.65% |
| 12 | SparkPost | 4 452 | 0.61% |
| 13 | SpamExperts (SolarWinds) | 4 041 | 0.56% |
| 14 | Marketo (Adobe) | 3 926 | 0.54% |
| 15 | Locaweb (BR) | 3 768 | 0.52% |
| 16 | Elastic Email | 3 012 | 0.42% |
| 17 | Salesforce | 2 858 | 0.39% |
| 18 | Help Scout | 2 018 | 0.28% |
| 19 | Unisender (RU) | 1 979 | 0.27% |
| 20 | MailHostBox | 1 839 | 0.25% |
| 21 | SMTP2GO | 1 600 | 0.22% |
| 22 | Freshdesk | 1 490 | 0.21% |
| 23 | Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) | 1 486 | 0.2% |
| 24 | Constant Contact | 1 481 | 0.2% |
| 25 | Exclaimer (signatures) | 1 292 | 0.18% |
| 26 | A Random Server (parking) | 1 279 | 0.18% |
| 27 | AuthSMTP | 1 237 | 0.17% |
| 28 | Barracuda Essentials | 1 152 | 0.16% |
| 29 | Infomaniak (CH) | 1 072 | 0.15% |
| 30 | SuperCP | 972 | 0.13% |
What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a
customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR,
e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the
customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers
(where the inbox lives).
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pardot (Salesforce) | 4 816 | 0.66% |
| 2 | Trustpilot | 2 089 | 0.29% |
| 3 | BigCommerce | 1 925 | 0.27% |
| 4 | Statuspage (Atlassian) | 1 352 | 0.19% |
| 5 | Zendesk | 1 190 | 0.16% |
| 6 | ClickDimensions | 954 | 0.13% |
| 7 | Shopify | 795 | 0.11% |
| 8 | PayPal Braintree | 723 | 0.1% |
| 9 | Qualtrics | 684 | 0.09% |
| 10 | CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 | 656 | 0.09% |
| # | SaaS app | Domains | Share of SPF-publishing domains |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | NetSuite (Oracle) | 594 | 0.08% |
| 12 | Firebase (Google) | 256 | 0.04% |
| 13 | ConnectWise | 241 | 0.03% |
| 14 | One.com (DK hosting) | 241 | 0.03% |
| 15 | Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) | 230 | 0.03% |
| 16 | SchoolMessenger | 194 | 0.03% |
| 17 | Recurly | 190 | 0.03% |
| 18 | Freshsales (Freshworks) | 189 | 0.03% |
| 19 | RetailCRM | 182 | 0.03% |
| 20 | Autotask (ConnectWise) | 167 | 0.02% |
| 21 | Greenhouse | 138 | 0.02% |
| 22 | KnowBe4 | 138 | 0.02% |
| 23 | Docebo (LMS) | 132 | 0.02% |
| 24 | Gannett (USA Today) | 116 | 0.02% |
| 25 | Shoptet | 107 | 0.01% |
| 26 | pair Networks | 100 | 0.01% |
| 27 | SurveyMonkey | 71 | 0.01% |
| 28 | Sage Intacct | 65 | 0.01% |
| 29 | Brightspace (D2L) | 58 | 0.01% |
| 30 | DocuSign | 39 | 0.01% |
What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain
advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only,
quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail,
invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only
quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually
enforcing.
The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted
"starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= /
ruf= tags) shared across many domains.
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | v=DMARC1; p=none; | 53 819 |
| 2 | v=DMARC1; p=none | 31 635 |
| 3 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 8 034 |
| 4 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; | 4 753 |
| 5 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine | 3 897 |
| 6 | v=DMARC1;p=none; | 3 765 |
| 7 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; | 3 674 |
| 8 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 3 272 |
| 9 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s | 3 195 |
| 10 | v=DMARC1; p=reject | 2 858 |
| 11 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 2 701 |
| 12 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100 | 2 330 |
| 13 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r; | 2 266 |
| 14 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 2 117 |
| 15 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 1 827 |
| 16 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none | 1 750 |
| 17 | v=DMARC1;p=none | 1 716 |
| 18 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 1 456 |
| 19 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=1 | 1 364 |
| 20 | v=DMARC1;p=reject; | 1 329 |
| 21 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 1 300 |
| 22 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 291 |
| 23 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 1 223 |
| 24 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 1 213 |
| 25 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 1 064 |
| # | DMARC record | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none | 1 055 |
| 27 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 1 051 |
| 28 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 1 044 |
| 29 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; | 1 039 |
| 30 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 976 |
| 31 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com | 887 |
| 32 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 886 |
| 33 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 788 |
| 34 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com; | 772 |
| 35 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100 | 702 |
| 36 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100 | 694 |
| 37 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 643 |
| 38 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 610 |
| 39 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 607 |
| 40 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com | 584 |
| 41 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 568 |
| 42 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com | 556 |
| 43 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine | 508 |
| 44 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 507 |
| 45 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com | 478 |
| 46 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; | 474 |
| 47 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s | 453 |
| 48 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; | 443 |
| 49 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r; | 439 |
| 50 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email; | 436 |
| 51 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1 | 385 |
| 52 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s | 381 |
| 53 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 371 |
| 54 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 359 |
| 55 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 359 |
| 56 | v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r | 358 |
| 57 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 352 |
| 58 | v=DMARC1;p=reject | 341 |
| 59 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; | 334 |
| 60 | v=DMARC1 | 330 |
| 61 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 325 |
| 62 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100 | 325 |
| 63 | v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1 | 324 |
| 64 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s; | 314 |
| 65 | v=DMARC1;p=quarantine; | 312 |
| 66 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; | 296 |
| 67 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; | 281 |
| 68 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1 | 276 |
| 69 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com | 271 |
| 70 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400 | 269 |
| 71 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r; | 258 |
| 72 | v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r | 250 |
| 73 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com | 247 |
| 74 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100 | 244 |
| 75 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 236 |
| 76 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com | 231 |
| 77 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s; | 227 |
| 78 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp | 225 |
| 79 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; | 223 |
| 80 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com; | 211 |
| 81 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 206 |
| 82 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r | 199 |
| 83 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject | 196 |
| 84 | v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100 | 190 |
| 85 | v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl | 186 |
| 86 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1; | 185 |
| 87 | v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com; | 182 |
| 88 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com | 179 |
| 89 | v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r; | 178 |
| 90 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com; | 176 |
| 91 | v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email | 175 |
| 92 | v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com | 172 |
| 93 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100; | 172 |
| 94 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; | 171 |
| 95 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400 | 169 |
| 96 | v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s | 168 |
| 97 | v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app | 167 |
| 98 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1 | 164 |
| 99 | v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400 | 161 |
| 100 | v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100 | 158 |
What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary
does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed
back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage
keeps improving.
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | mx01.1and1.com | 4 436 |
| 2 | mx00.1and1.com | 4 406 |
| 3 | mx01.1and1.es | 3 739 |
| 4 | mx00.1and1.es | 3 716 |
| 5 | p.webcom.ctmail.com | 3 365 |
| 6 | mx01.1and1.co.uk | 2 918 |
| 7 | mx00.1and1.co.uk | 2 898 |
| 8 | mx01.1and1.fr | 2 705 |
| 9 | mx00.1and1.fr | 2 692 |
| 10 | mx1.netsolmail.net | 1 889 |
| 11 | mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net | 1 655 |
| 12 | smx2.web-hosting.com | 1 649 |
| 13 | mx01.schlund.de | 1 627 |
| 14 | mx00.schlund.de | 1 619 |
| 15 | mx1.jimdo.com | 1 573 |
| 16 | mx2.jimdo.com | 1 573 |
| 17 | smx1.web-hosting.com | 1 493 |
| 18 | smx3.web-hosting.com | 1 491 |
| 19 | mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk | 1 342 |
| 20 | asp.reflexion.net | 1 061 |
| 21 | mx7.webfaction.com | 861 |
| 22 | mx8.webfaction.com | 856 |
| 23 | mx9.webfaction.com | 846 |
| 24 | mx-100.reflexion.net | 845 |
| 25 | mx-110.reflexion.net | 814 |
| # | MX target | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | localhost | 614 |
| 27 | mx92.m1bp.com | 575 |
| 28 | mx92.mb5p.com | 575 |
| 29 | relay1.netnames.net | 570 |
| 30 | relay2.netnames.net | 568 |
| 31 | sitemail.everyone.net | 544 |
| 32 | mail.net4india.com | 519 |
| 33 | mx4.volusion.com | 483 |
| 34 | mx3.volusion.com | 481 |
| 35 | smtp-avas.seeweb.it | 457 |
| 36 | in.hes.trendmicro.eu | 454 |
| 37 | smtp-fwd.wordpress.com | 444 |
| 38 | mx-backup.serveriai.lt | 425 |
| 39 | inbound.registeredsite.com | 410 |
| 40 | webmail2.sitebuildit.com | 367 |
| 41 | smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net | 353 |
| 42 | smtp-avas-th.seeweb.it | 351 |
| 43 | mx.maxns.net | 342 |
| 44 | mx76.mb1p.com | 341 |
| 45 | mx76.m2bp.com | 341 |
| 46 | mx1.servage.net | 340 |
| 47 | mail.global.frontbridge.com | 340 |
| 48 | mx2.servage.net | 339 |
| 49 | mailin.mx-hub.sk | 330 |
| 50 | mailgw.nic.in | 329 |
| 51 | mailin.mx-hub.eu | 327 |
| 52 | mx.unoeuro.com | 327 |
| 53 | mailin.mx-hub.cz | 326 |
| 54 | mx07.register.com | 313 |
| 55 | webmail.mail.maxns.net | 303 |
| 56 | mail-fr.securemail.pro | 301 |
| 57 | mx.usa.net | 300 |
| 58 | mx2.cloudhosting.co.uk | 299 |
| 59 | mx1.cloudhosting.co.uk | 298 |
| 60 | mx2.firstfind.nl | 293 |
| 61 | mx1.firstfind.nl | 290 |
| 62 | posta.mediacenter.hu | 286 |
| 63 | posta2.mediacenter.hu | 286 |
| 64 | posta3.mediacenter.hu | 286 |
| 65 | posta4.mediacenter.hu | 285 |
| 66 | posta5.mediacenter.hu | 284 |
| 67 | mx.online.net | 282 |
| 68 | mx-cache.online.net | 278 |
| 69 | ntvirus.url.com.tw | 275 |
| 70 | ntvirus2.url.com.tw | 275 |
| 71 | mx1d10.thinline.cz | 275 |
| 72 | mx1b20.thinline.cz | 272 |
| 73 | backupmx.hostmaster.sk | 269 |
| 74 | mx01.easyname.eu | 266 |
| 75 | mx02.easyname.eu | 266 |
| 76 | mforward.dtag.de | 263 |
| 77 | mx1.email-cluster.com | 260 |
| 78 | mx2.email-cluster.com | 258 |
| 79 | failover1.email-cluster.com | 258 |
| 80 | mx1.dnsmadeeasy.com | 254 |
| 81 | smtp-01.servidoresdns.net | 253 |
| 82 | mxa.expurgate.de | 252 |
| 83 | mail2.infomart2000.com | 251 |
| 84 | mx01.goneo.de | 250 |
| 85 | mx02.goneo.de | 250 |
| 86 | mx1.premium.jfg-networks.net | 248 |
| 87 | mx2.premium.jfg-networks.net | 248 |
| 88 | mx8.name.com | 245 |
| 89 | mx4.name.com | 243 |
| 90 | mx3.name.com | 243 |
| 91 | mx.buzondecorreo.com | 243 |
| 92 | mx5.name.com | 242 |
| 93 | mx7.name.com | 242 |
| 94 | smx4.web-hosting.com | 242 |
| 95 | mx2.dnsmadeeasy.com | 242 |
| 96 | mx6.name.com | 240 |
| 97 | mailfilter1.mijndomein.nl | 240 |
| 98 | mailfilter2.mijndomein.nl | 238 |
| 99 | mx1.krystal.co.uk | 237 |
| 100 | mx2.krystal.co.uk | 236 |
What this block shows. The most popular SPF include:
targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same
feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or
dictionaries/saas_senders.py.
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | bluehost.com | 11 019 |
| 2 | cmail1.com | 2 601 |
| 3 | outlook.com | 2 487 |
| 4 | hostmonster.com | 1 625 |
| 5 | spf.mail.intercom.io | 1 590 |
| 6 | _spf.websupport.sk | 1 291 |
| 7 | infusionmail.com | 1 221 |
| 8 | spf.hostmar.com | 1 198 |
| 9 | spf.webapps.net | 1 042 |
| 10 | beget.ru | 1 014 |
| 11 | gridhost.co.uk | 966 |
| 12 | spf.linuxpl.com | 928 |
| 13 | justhost.com | 872 |
| 14 | nicmail.ru | 858 |
| 15 | icpbounce.com | 853 |
| 16 | _spf.srv.cat | 827 |
| 17 | hotmail.com | 819 |
| 18 | spf.whservidor.com | 762 |
| 19 | msgfocus.com | 752 |
| 20 | sharepointonline.com | 731 |
| 21 | mxlogic.net | 712 |
| 22 | spf.tld.pl | 692 |
| 23 | _spf.emfwd.name-services.com | 659 |
| 24 | _spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com | 627 |
| 25 | spf.dondominio.com | 608 |
| # | SPF include | Domains |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | e2ma.net | 607 |
| 27 | salesforce.com | 602 |
| 28 | reflexion.net | 598 |
| 29 | _spf.uni5.net | 598 |
| 30 | mailcontrol.com | 585 |
| 31 | spf.autopilothq.com | 581 |
| 32 | _spf.anpdm.com | 558 |
| 33 | spf.serveriai.lt | 554 |
| 34 | google.com | 529 |
| 35 | spf1.auinmeio.com.br | 522 |
| 36 | _spf.domeneshop.no | 521 |
| 37 | worldsecuresystems.com | 518 |
| 38 | spf2.auinmeio.com.br | 518 |
| 39 | smtproutes.com | 507 |
| 40 | spf.dominioabsoluto.net | 505 |
| 41 | turbo-smtp.com | 505 |
| 42 | _spf.zdsys.com | 500 |
| 43 | outboundmail.convio.net | 499 |
| 44 | _spf.fastmail.gr | 497 |
| 45 | _spf.heteml.jp | 493 |
| 46 | smtp1.uservoice.com | 493 |
| 47 | smtpout.com | 487 |
| 48 | _spfcls.natrohost.com | 485 |
| 49 | spf.hes.trendmicro.com | 481 |
| 50 | spf.nl2go.com | 478 |
| 51 | smtp.groovehq.com | 476 |
| 52 | _netblockshalon.natrohost.com | 465 |
| 53 | gmail.com | 456 |
| 54 | spf.protection.3dcart.com | 447 |
| 55 | _spf.loading.es | 444 |
| 56 | spf.masterbase.com | 437 |
| 57 | _spf.zenbox.pl | 435 |
| 58 | _spf.transip.email | 428 |
| 59 | _spf.th.seeweb.it | 427 |
| 60 | bmsend.com | 422 |
| 61 | spf.w4ymail.at | 413 |
| 62 | spf.secure.ne.jp | 379 |
| 63 | appriver.com | 378 |
| 64 | spf.messaging.microsoft.com | 371 |
| 65 | spf.hostedmail.net.au | 368 |
| 66 | jangomail.com | 363 |
| 67 | _spf.act-on.net | 361 |
| 68 | spf.blacknight.ie | 361 |
| 69 | mh.blackboard.com | 355 |
| 70 | spf.raiolanetworks.com | 349 |
| 71 | _spf.hoster.by | 348 |
| 72 | spf.mailcluster.com.au | 345 |
| 73 | pepipost.net | 343 |
| 74 | datadrivenemail.com | 338 |
| 75 | email-od.com | 328 |
| 76 | custspf.register.com | 326 |
| 77 | ncfp.asia | 326 |
| 78 | relays.webhost-mail.com | 324 |
| 79 | spf.mailengine1.com | 323 |
| 80 | _senderspf.copernica.com | 320 |
| 81 | mailanyone.net | 314 |
| 82 | emsmtp.com | 312 |
| 83 | spf.263xmail.com | 302 |
| 84 | netcore.co.in | 300 |
| 85 | spf.smartemailing.cz | 299 |
| 86 | _spf.nameserver.sk | 297 |
| 87 | spf.clearslide.com | 294 |
| 88 | eblastengine.com | 293 |
| 89 | spf.byte.nl | 288 |
| 90 | email.freshservice.com | 281 |
| 91 | _spf.syrahost.com | 275 |
| 92 | rnmk.com | 275 |
| 93 | spf.virtualtarget.com.br | 275 |
| 94 | spf.zixsmbhosted.com | 270 |
| 95 | send.aweber.com | 268 |
| 96 | spf.lianamailer.com | 267 |
| 97 | nl2go.com | 263 |
| 98 | spf.maropost.com | 262 |
| 99 | md02.com | 259 |
| 100 | gandi.net | 257 |
The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.
Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.
We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.
For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest
mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that
primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py).
Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic
fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no
rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in
Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.
For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every
include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open
dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously
(e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.
Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.
For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records
starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and
pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if
p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or
pct absent, which defaults to 100).
Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.
Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).
mail.example.com →
mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target
is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a
CNAME to a known provider.Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.
Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.onlineInline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.
Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.