Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2017-12-01.

818 419
Domains with MX
513 903
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
818 419
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted310 23737.91%
2Google Workspace138 66016.94%
3Unknown / Other79 1209.67%
4Microsoft 36550 6976.19%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)36 4324.45%
6GoDaddy23 9952.93%
7Yandex 36020 8932.55%
8Generic / unmatched (mail.*)17 2342.11%
9QQ Mail (Tencent)11 9761.46%
10OVH Mail9 1811.12%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Zoho Mail8 0930.99%
12Namecheap Email Forwarding7 7430.95%
13Rackspace Email6 2950.77%
14Mimecast6 1370.75%
15Symantec MessageLabs5 3420.65%
16Proofpoint4 4330.54%
17Beget (RU)4 2230.52%
18SpamExperts (SolarWinds)3 5740.44%
19DreamHost3 1480.38%
20Alibaba Mail (China)3 0290.37%
21Mail.ru for Business2 6010.32%
22Gandi Mail2 5070.31%
23Generic / unmatched (smtp.*)2 3490.29%
241&1 IONOS2 2710.28%
25GMO Lolipop (JP)2 2210.27%
26Barracuda2 1420.26%
27Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)2 0730.25%
28ISPGateway (DE)2 0470.25%
29Ukraine.com.ua hosting1 9740.24%
30Mailgun (inbound)1 9210.23%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
16.51%
135 135 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
50 696
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
37.92%
310 378 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mandrill26 4215.14%
2Mailchimp22 7964.44%
3SendGrid (Twilio)19 3593.77%
4Zendesk14 6122.84%
5Mailgun14 0412.73%
6Amazon SES10 3902.02%
7Namecheap Forwarding8 1191.58%
8Mailjet (Sinch)5 2231.02%
9Mimecast4 0190.78%
10SparkPost3 8540.75%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Postmark3 8170.74%
12Marketo (Adobe)3 6160.7%
13MailChannels3 0760.6%
14Salesforce2 4870.48%
15Elastic Email2 4200.47%
16Unisender (RU)1 9420.38%
17SpamExperts (SolarWinds)1 9060.37%
18Locaweb (BR)1 8730.36%
19Help Scout1 7740.35%
20MailHostBox1 5450.3%
21Freshdesk1 2760.25%
22Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)1 1440.22%
23A Random Server (parking)1 1170.22%
24SMTP2GO1 0600.21%
25Constant Contact1 0160.2%
26AuthSMTP9520.19%
27Salesforce Marketing Cloud8530.17%
28Kagoya (JP, sender)8320.16%
29MailerSend8200.16%
30Exclaimer (signatures)7600.15%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)3 9530.77%
2Trustpilot1 8690.36%
3Statuspage (Atlassian)1 2630.25%
4Zendesk1 1670.23%
5BigCommerce1 1160.22%
6ClickDimensions7180.14%
7PayPal Braintree6780.13%
8Shopify6490.13%
9Qualtrics6180.12%
10NetSuite (Oracle)4890.1%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11CodeTwo Email Signatures 3653760.07%
12Firebase (Google)2200.04%
13Recurly1900.04%
14Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)1770.03%
15SchoolMessenger1570.03%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)1530.03%
17Gannett (USA Today)1210.02%
18RetailCRM1190.02%
19Docebo (LMS)1180.02%
20ConnectWise1090.02%
21One.com (DK hosting)980.02%
22KnowBe4890.02%
23Autotask (ConnectWise)850.02%
24pair Networks810.02%
25Greenhouse630.01%
26Brightspace (D2L)570.01%
27Shoptet550.01%
28SurveyMonkey400.01%
29Sage Intacct400.01%
30DocuSign330.01%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▼ -46.78%30d ago▼ -46.00%90d ago▼ -45.15%1y ago▼ -42.73%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx01.1and1.com2 268
2mx00.1and1.com2 251
3p.webcom.ctmail.com1 612
4mx01.1and1.fr1 355
5mx00.1and1.fr1 346
6mx01.1and1.es1 325
7mx00.1and1.es1 314
8smx2.web-hosting.com1 223
9smx1.web-hosting.com1 143
10smx3.web-hosting.com1 138
11mx01.1and1.co.uk1 014
12mx00.1and1.co.uk997
13mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net805
14mx1.netsolmail.net743
15mx7.webfaction.com589
16mx8.webfaction.com583
17mx9.webfaction.com570
18mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk529
19asp.reflexion.net526
20mail.net4india.com435
21mx-100.reflexion.net430
22mx-110.reflexion.net418
23smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net379
24smtp-01.servidoresdns.net358
25mx01.schlund.de347
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx00.schlund.de344
27mx.maxns.net342
28relay1.netnames.net341
29relay2.netnames.net341
30mx94.mb1p.com329
31smtp-02.servidoresdns.net329
32mailgw.nic.in323
33webmail2.sitebuildit.com312
34localhost307
35mx1.jimdo.com300
36mx2.jimdo.com300
37mxcom.263xmail.com280
38mxwcom.263xmail.com277
39mail.global.frontbridge.com274
40mx3.volusion.com261
41mx4.volusion.com261
42mx-backup.serveriai.lt260
43webmail.mail.maxns.net256
44mx.orangegeek.net250
45sitemail.everyone.net240
46in.hes.trendmicro.eu230
47altmx2.orangegeek.net229
48altmx3.orangegeek.net228
49vcgw1.ocn.ad.jp224
50vcgw2.ocn.ad.jp223
51mx.usa.net220
52smtp-avas.seeweb.it220
53mx76.mb1p.com216
54mx76.m2bp.com216
55smtp-fwd.wordpress.com208
56mx1.servage.net207
57mx4.name.com205
58mx8.name.com205
59mx2.servage.net204
60mx5.name.com203
61mx3.name.com202
62mx92.m1bp.com202
63mx92.mb5p.com202
64mx6.name.com201
65mx7.name.com201
66mx1.dnsmadeeasy.com192
67mail1.sbnation.com187
68mx2.dnsmadeeasy.com182
69cluster.relay.agava.net181
70mxi.alpha-prm.jp181
71inbound.mail.naiadsystems.com179
72mxa.expurgate.de179
73mx.aams4.jp178
74mx-0.aams4.jp177
75mx-1.aams4.jp176
76gmail22.gadmail.de174
77gmail23.gadmail.de174
78wmail22.gadmail.de174
79wmail23.gadmail.de174
80mx3.dnsmadeeasy.com168
81mx2.peterhost.ru164
82mx3.peterhost.ru164
83nan162
84mx-in01b.natrohost.com161
85mx-in01.natrohost.com160
86inbound.registeredsite.com159
87mail.messaging.microsoft.com156
88your-dns-needs-immediate-attention.dev156
89igw5002.site4now.net153
90mx1.zone.eu152
91mx2.zone.eu152
92mx.unoeuro.com151
93mx.ct.mbox.net150
94mailforward.dnsv.jp150
95mx1b20.thinline.cz149
96smx4.web-hosting.com148
97mx1d10.thinline.cz148
98mail-s30.1gb.ru145
99mxgw1.mail.nationalnet.com144
100mx4.peterhost.ru143

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com5 874
2cmail1.com1 830
3outlook.com1 565
4spf.mail.intercom.io1 304
5beget.ru1 051
6infusionmail.com1 006
7hostmonster.com805
8_spf.heteml.jp777
9nicmail.ru753
10icpbounce.com740
11hotmail.com718
12spf.secure.ne.jp658
13sharepointonline.com604
14_spf.websupport.sk593
15msgfocus.com573
16salesforce.com555
17mxlogic.net550
18_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com528
19spf1.auinmeio.com.br515
20spf2.auinmeio.com.br513
21smtp1.uservoice.com486
22_spf.emfwd.name-services.com477
23_spf.anpdm.com473
24spf.autopilothq.com468
25_spf.zdsys.com460
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26google.com455
27e2ma.net451
28mailcontrol.com442
29gmail.com438
30spf.263xmail.com420
31justhost.com415
32spf.masterbase.com404
33spf.hostmar.com402
34smtp.groovehq.com401
35outboundmail.convio.net401
36spf.whservidor.com399
37spf.linuxpl.com389
38_spfcls.natrohost.com386
39spf.webapps.net383
40gridhost.co.uk371
41turbo-smtp.com362
42bmsend.com353
43spf.tld.pl351
44spf.securemx.jp349
45spf.serveriai.lt348
46mh.blackboard.com345
47spf.messaging.microsoft.com334
48ncfp.asia326
49_netblockshalon.natrohost.com325
50datadrivenemail.com315
51_spf.fastmail.gr313
52pepipost.net309
53netcore.co.in300
54emsmtp.com299
55reflexion.net298
56_spf.hoster.by296
57_spf.srv.cat288
58_spf.act-on.net288
59_senderspf.copernica.com285
60jangomail.com285
61eblastengine.com282
62rnmk.com280
63spf.hes.trendmicro.com280
64spf.mailengine1.com276
65spf.dondominio.com274
66email-od.com273
67spfgw.fsi.ne.jp268
68spf.clearslide.com266
69_spf.zenbox.pl262
70spf.protection.3dcart.com259
71spf.virtualtarget.com.br255
72smtproutes.com250
73spf.maropost.com249
74spf.nl2go.com245
75smtpout.com242
76send.aweber.com229
77veinteractive.biz229
78spf.digitalinsight.com223
79_spf.daum.net219
80_netblocks.google.com217
81spf.haihaimail.jp216
82spf.sendcloud.org215
83_spf.acquia.com215
84_spf.turhost.com215
85spf.shopback.com.br214
86_spf.uni5.net211
87_spf.domeneshop.no208
88spf.bserver.jp206
89_spf.embluemail.com206
90spf.comendosystems.com204
91activetrail.com201
92bluehornet.com201
931lejend.com194
94relays.webhost-mail.com194
95email.freshservice.com192
96mailanyone.net190
97_spf.staysecuregroup.com188
98appriver.com186
99spf.smartemailing.cz186
100_spf.loading.es182

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF2018-05-01 — 1 168 881 MX, 732 275 SPF2018-04-01 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2018-03-01 — 827 056 MX, 516 103 SPF2018-02-01 — 1 195 663 MX, 725 044 SPF2018-01-01 — 813 525 MX, 512 876 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2017-12-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T17:16:37Z.