Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2017-10-01.

823 380
Domains with MX
508 173
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
823 380
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted315 83238.36%
2Google Workspace138 42616.81%
3Unknown / Other81 3039.87%
4Microsoft 36549 7076.04%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)36 0314.38%
6GoDaddy25 2833.07%
7Yandex 36019 7112.39%
8Generic / unmatched (mail.*)17 5372.13%
9QQ Mail (Tencent)12 6391.54%
10OVH Mail9 1801.11%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Zoho Mail7 8150.95%
12Namecheap Email Forwarding7 5730.92%
13Rackspace Email6 3900.78%
14Mimecast6 0090.73%
15Symantec MessageLabs5 6550.69%
16Proofpoint4 2220.51%
17Beget (RU)3 8200.46%
18Alibaba Mail (China)3 1460.38%
19DreamHost3 1420.38%
20GMO Lolipop (JP)2 6840.33%
21Gandi Mail2 5530.31%
22SpamExperts (SolarWinds)2 4440.3%
23Mail.ru for Business2 3820.29%
24Generic / unmatched (smtp.*)2 3480.29%
251&1 IONOS2 2690.28%
26ISPGateway (DE)2 1310.26%
27Barracuda2 0320.25%
28All-Inkl (DE)1 9330.23%
29Mailgun (inbound)1 9020.23%
30Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS)1 9000.23%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
16.67%
137 219 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
52 233
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
38.37%
315 971 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mandrill26 1115.14%
2Mailchimp20 9144.12%
3SendGrid (Twilio)19 4563.83%
4Zendesk14 7682.91%
5Mailgun13 6892.69%
6Amazon SES10 0141.97%
7Namecheap Forwarding7 9601.57%
8Mailjet (Sinch)4 9340.97%
9SparkPost3 9060.77%
10Mimecast3 8630.76%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Postmark3 8400.76%
12Marketo (Adobe)3 6550.72%
13MailChannels3 0200.59%
14Salesforce2 4100.47%
15Elastic Email2 2580.44%
16Locaweb (BR)1 9310.38%
17Unisender (RU)1 8060.36%
18Help Scout1 7760.35%
19SpamExperts (SolarWinds)1 6160.32%
20MailHostBox1 5390.3%
21Freshdesk1 2490.25%
22A Random Server (parking)1 0610.21%
23SMTP2GO1 0060.2%
24Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)1 0050.2%
25Constant Contact9680.19%
26Kagoya (JP, sender)9430.19%
27AuthSMTP9370.18%
28Salesforce Marketing Cloud8310.16%
29MailerSend7540.15%
30Exclaimer (signatures)7170.14%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)3 9100.77%
2Trustpilot1 8600.37%
3Statuspage (Atlassian)1 2270.24%
4Zendesk1 2080.24%
5BigCommerce1 0590.21%
6ClickDimensions7250.14%
7PayPal Braintree6750.13%
8Qualtrics5950.12%
9Shopify5880.12%
10NetSuite (Oracle)4730.09%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11CodeTwo Email Signatures 3653420.07%
12Recurly1920.04%
13Firebase (Google)1770.03%
14Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)1650.03%
15SchoolMessenger1580.03%
16Freshsales (Freshworks)1340.03%
17Gannett (USA Today)1190.02%
18Docebo (LMS)1060.02%
19RetailCRM980.02%
20One.com (DK hosting)970.02%
21ConnectWise860.02%
22pair Networks860.02%
23Autotask (ConnectWise)840.02%
24KnowBe4700.01%
25Brightspace (D2L)520.01%
26SurveyMonkey370.01%
27Shoptet360.01%
28DocuSign310.01%
29Sage Intacct300.01%
30Exact Online (NL ERP)190.0%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▼ -46.78%30d ago▼ -46.00%90d ago▼ -45.15%1y ago▼ -42.73%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx01.1and1.com2 325
2mx00.1and1.com2 306
3p.webcom.ctmail.com1 651
4mx01.1and1.fr1 396
5mx00.1and1.fr1 383
6mx01.1and1.es1 325
7mx00.1and1.es1 312
8smx2.web-hosting.com1 207
9smx1.web-hosting.com1 126
10smx3.web-hosting.com1 125
11mx01.1and1.co.uk1 003
12mx00.1and1.co.uk987
13mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net817
14mx7.webfaction.com605
15mx8.webfaction.com598
16mx9.webfaction.com584
17mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk562
18asp.reflexion.net546
19mx-100.reflexion.net442
20mail.net4india.com439
21mx-110.reflexion.net428
22relay1.netnames.net363
23relay2.netnames.net362
24smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net357
25mx01.schlund.de355
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26smtp-01.servidoresdns.net350
27mx00.schlund.de350
28smtp-02.servidoresdns.net347
29mx.maxns.net346
30webmail2.sitebuildit.com339
31mailgw.nic.in327
32mxwcom.263xmail.com308
33mxcom.263xmail.com304
34mx92.m1bp.com299
35mx92.mb5p.com299
36mx94.mb1p.com296
37mx1.jimdo.com296
38mx2.jimdo.com296
39mail.global.frontbridge.com279
40webmail.mail.maxns.net275
41vcgw1.ocn.ad.jp272
42vcgw2.ocn.ad.jp270
43localhost265
44sitemail.everyone.net255
45mx3.volusion.com251
46mx4.volusion.com250
47mx-backup.serveriai.lt237
48mx76.mb1p.com236
49mx76.m2bp.com236
50mx.orangegeek.net232
51smtp-avas.seeweb.it232
52mx.usa.net218
53in.hes.trendmicro.eu215
54mx4.name.com214
55mx8.name.com214
56mx3.name.com213
57mx5.name.com212
58mx6.name.com211
59mx7.name.com211
60mx1.servage.net211
61mx2.servage.net208
62altmx2.orangegeek.net208
63altmx3.orangegeek.net207
64mxi.alpha-prm.jp200
65smtp-fwd.wordpress.com197
66mx6.advancedhosters.com190
67mx1.dnsmadeeasy.com188
68your-dns-needs-immediate-attention.dev186
69mail1.sbnation.com183
70mx2.dnsmadeeasy.com180
71gmail22.gadmail.de180
72gmail23.gadmail.de180
73wmail22.gadmail.de180
74wmail23.gadmail.de180
75mx.aams4.jp177
76mx-0.aams4.jp175
77cluster.relay.agava.net174
78mx-1.aams4.jp173
79mx2.peterhost.ru169
80mx3.peterhost.ru169
81mxa.expurgate.de169
82mail.messaging.microsoft.com167
83mailforward.dnsv.jp167
84mx3.dnsmadeeasy.com165
85inbound.mail.naiadsystems.com161
86inbound.registeredsite.com161
87mforward.dtag.de157
88mx4.peterhost.ru152
89nan150
90mxgw1.mail.nationalnet.com150
91mx.unoeuro.com149
92mx.ct.mbox.net148
93mxgw2.mail.nationalnet.com148
94webmail1.sitebuildit.com146
95smx4.web-hosting.com145
96mx1b20.thinline.cz144
97mx1d10.thinline.cz143
98mx.online.net141
99mx2.mailhop.org140
100igw5002.site4now.net139

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com5 942
2cmail1.com1 844
3outlook.com1 675
4spf.mail.intercom.io1 355
5beget.ru1 023
6infusionmail.com996
7_spf.heteml.jp897
8hostmonster.com847
9hotmail.com789
10spf.secure.ne.jp755
11nicmail.ru741
12icpbounce.com716
13sharepointonline.com641
14mxlogic.net610
15salesforce.com591
16_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com576
17_spf.websupport.sk571
18msgfocus.com569
19smtp1.uservoice.com511
20spf1.auinmeio.com.br499
21spf2.auinmeio.com.br497
22_spf.zdsys.com472
23justhost.com462
24_spf.anpdm.com460
25google.com449
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.autopilothq.com446
27spf.263xmail.com442
28spf.hostmar.com433
29e2ma.net431
30gmail.com429
31mailcontrol.com425
32spf.linuxpl.com424
33outboundmail.convio.net422
34_spf.emfwd.name-services.com409
35spf.whservidor.com399
36smtp.groovehq.com392
37spf.masterbase.com391
38gridhost.co.uk375
39spf.securemx.jp370
40turbo-smtp.com361
41spf.messaging.microsoft.com355
42spf.tld.pl349
43mh.blackboard.com337
44_spfcls.natrohost.com333
45spf.serveriai.lt329
46spf.webapps.net327
47bmsend.com326
48datadrivenemail.com323
49ncfp.asia308
50reflexion.net305
51_spf.zenbox.pl297
52emsmtp.com294
53spfgw.fsi.ne.jp293
54netcore.co.in290
55_spf.act-on.net288
56jangomail.com287
57pepipost.net283
58eblastengine.com278
59spf.mailengine1.com276
60rnmk.com276
61spf.dondominio.com269
62spf.clearslide.com262
63spf.hes.trendmicro.com260
64_spf.hoster.by258
65_spf.fastmail.gr256
66spf.virtualtarget.com.br255
67spf.protection.3dcart.com252
68email-od.com251
69_spf.srv.cat249
70_senderspf.copernica.com248
71smtproutes.com245
72spf.maropost.com237
73veinteractive.biz235
74send.aweber.com231
75smtpout.com229
76spf.bserver.jp227
77spf.sendcloud.org225
78spf.comendosystems.com225
79spf.haihaimail.jp225
80spf.digitalinsight.com221
81_spf.daum.net220
82_netblocks.google.com218
83_spf.uni5.net216
84spf.shopback.com.br213
851lejend.com211
86_spf.acquia.com202
87spf.alpha-prm.jp201
88bluehornet.com200
89spf.nl2go.com199
90spf.futoka.jp199
91spf001.shop-pro.jp197
92_spf.staysecuregroup.com197
93activetrail.com195
94_spf.activegate-ss.jp194
95mailanyone.net192
96relays.webhost-mail.com191
97_spf.embluemail.com189
98smp.ne.jp188
99_spf.domeneshop.no188
100email.freshservice.com187

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF2018-05-01 — 1 168 881 MX, 732 275 SPF2018-04-01 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2018-03-01 — 827 056 MX, 516 103 SPF2018-02-01 — 1 195 663 MX, 725 044 SPF2018-01-01 — 813 525 MX, 512 876 SPF2017-12-01 — 818 419 MX, 513 903 SPF2017-11-01 — 815 080 MX, 507 477 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2017-10-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T17:24:16Z.