Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2016-10-01.

838 377
Domains with MX
469 807
Domains with SPF
0
Domains with DMARC
838 377
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted352 53842.05%
2Google Workspace134 38316.03%
3Unknown / Other84 05510.03%
4Microsoft 36539 5544.72%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*)35 6884.26%
6GoDaddy33 3853.98%
7Generic / unmatched (mail.*)18 7102.23%
8Yandex 36015 0071.79%
9QQ Mail (Tencent)11 8031.41%
10OVH Mail9 0221.08%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Zoho Mail7 3360.88%
12Rackspace Email6 9380.83%
13Namecheap Email Forwarding6 7040.8%
14Symantec MessageLabs6 1280.73%
15Mimecast4 0680.49%
16DreamHost3 2910.39%
17GMO Lolipop (JP)2 8920.34%
18Proofpoint2 8150.34%
19Gandi Mail2 4150.29%
20Generic / unmatched (smtp.*)2 3770.28%
21Beget (RU)2 3500.28%
22McAfee/Mxlogic2 3470.28%
231&1 IONOS2 3270.28%
24Alibaba Mail (China)2 2710.27%
25SpamExperts (SolarWinds)2 1820.26%
26ISPGateway (DE)2 1660.26%
27Locaweb (BR)2 0630.25%
28MailHostBox1 6060.19%
29Mail.ru for Business1 5210.18%
30NetEase 1631 5170.18%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
16.8%
140 830 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
52 647
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
42.07%
352 685 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·🏠 Providers portfolio →·📧 SaaS/ESP senders →·📮 Mailing services (ESPs) →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Mandrill25 6755.47%
2SendGrid (Twilio)16 9173.6%
3Mailchimp12 6642.7%
4Zendesk11 9602.55%
5Mailgun10 7192.28%
6Amazon SES7 6681.63%
7Namecheap Forwarding7 2061.53%
8Mailjet (Sinch)3 9650.84%
9SparkPost3 8530.82%
10Marketo (Adobe)3 1320.67%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Postmark3 0570.65%
12MailChannels3 0310.65%
13Locaweb (BR)2 4330.52%
14Mimecast2 2440.48%
15MailHostBox1 8300.39%
16Elastic Email1 5170.32%
17Salesforce1 4640.31%
18Help Scout1 4340.31%
19Freshdesk1 1120.24%
20Unisender (RU)1 0870.23%
21Kagoya (JP, sender)1 0090.21%
22A Random Server (parking)9630.2%
23AuthSMTP8040.17%
24Salesforce Marketing Cloud7270.15%
25Constant Contact6580.14%
26SMTP2GO6460.14%
27Sailthru6230.13%
28Customer.io5290.11%
29Brevo (ex-Sendinblue)5180.11%
30Infomaniak (CH)5170.11%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Pardot (Salesforce)2 8860.61%
2Trustpilot1 8000.38%
3Zendesk1 4600.31%
4BigCommerce9550.2%
5Statuspage (Atlassian)6750.14%
6PayPal Braintree5800.12%
7Qualtrics4380.09%
8ClickDimensions4310.09%
9Shopify2450.05%
10NetSuite (Oracle)2140.05%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Recurly1980.04%
12SchoolMessenger840.02%
13CodeTwo Email Signatures 365820.02%
14pair Networks780.02%
15One.com (DK hosting)690.01%
16Firebase (Google)590.01%
17Autotask (ConnectWise)540.01%
18Docebo (LMS)520.01%
19Gannett (USA Today)490.01%
20RetailCRM360.01%
21ConnectWise330.01%
22SurveyMonkey270.01%
23DocuSign210.0%
24Brightspace (D2L)180.0%
25Shoptet160.0%
26Atlassian (Jira/Confluence)130.0%
27Workday100.0%
28Sage Intacct90.0%
29Umantis (Haufe HR)90.0%
30Basecamp80.0%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▼ -46.78%30d ago▼ -46.00%90d ago▼ -45.15%1y ago▼ -42.73%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;53 819
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 635
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 034
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 753
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 897
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 765
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 674
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 272
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 195
10v=DMARC1; p=reject2 858
11v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 701
12v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 266
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 117
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 827
16v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 750
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 716
18v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 456
19v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 364
20v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 223
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 213
25v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 064
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 055
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 051
28v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com1 044
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;1 039
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;976
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com887
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s886
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email788
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;772
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100702
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100694
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400643
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com584
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400568
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com556
43v=DMARC1;p=quarantine508
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com478
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;474
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s453
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;443
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;436
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1385
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s381
53v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r371
54v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;359
55v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;359
56v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r358
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com352
58v=DMARC1;p=reject341
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
60v=DMARC1330
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
62v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100325
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1324
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;312
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;296
67v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
68v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1276
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
70v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400269
71v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;258
72v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100244
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com236
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com231
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;227
78v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp225
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;223
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;211
81v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com206
82v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r199
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100190
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;182
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;178
90v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:lufthansa@rua.agari.com;176
91v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email175
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com172
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;172
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400169
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s168
97v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1164
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400161
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1mx01.1and1.com2 504
2mx00.1and1.com2 477
3smx2.web-hosting.com1 745
4p.webcom.ctmail.com1 655
5smx1.web-hosting.com1 583
6smx3.web-hosting.com1 583
7mx01.1and1.es1 551
8mx00.1and1.es1 526
9mx01.1and1.fr1 483
10mx00.1and1.fr1 465
11mx01.1and1.co.uk1 093
12mx00.1and1.co.uk1 069
13mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net878
14mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk722
15mx7.webfaction.com645
16mx8.webfaction.com641
17mx9.webfaction.com634
18mail.post-host.net535
19mail.net4india.com504
20mx01.schlund.de432
21null.invalid.mx430
22mx00.schlund.de427
23asp.reflexion.net409
24relay2.netnames.net380
25relay1.netnames.net378
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26webmail2.sitebuildit.com360
27eforwardct.name-services.com351
28eforwardct2.name-services.com350
29smtp-02.servidoresdns.net350
30eforwardct3.name-services.com347
31mx1.firstserver.ne.jp340
32mx2.firstserver.ne.jp339
33sitemail.everyone.net327
34your-dns-needs-immediate-attention.dev324
35smtp-01.servidoresdns.net320
36smtp-scan01.mx.reflected.net312
37mail.global.frontbridge.com309
38mx-backup1.serveriai.lt303
39mx-backup2.serveriai.lt303
40mx-100.reflexion.net301
41mx4.volusion.com301
42mx3.volusion.com299
43smx4.web-hosting.com297
44mx-110.reflexion.net294
45mxcom.263xmail.com290
46mxwcom.263xmail.com285
47vcgw1.ocn.ad.jp268
48vcgw2.ocn.ad.jp266
49mx1.jimdo.com264
50mx2.jimdo.com264
51smtp-avas.seeweb.it256
52mx1.dnsmadeeasy.com252
53mx2.dnsmadeeasy.com245
54mailgw.nic.in244
55mx1.servage.net242
56mx.aams4.jp239
57mx2.servage.net239
58mx-0.aams4.jp237
59mx-1.aams4.jp236
60mx.usa.net234
61localhost228
62smtp-fwd.wordpress.com226
63mx3.dnsmadeeasy.com223
64mxi.alpha-prm.jp214
65mail.messaging.microsoft.com213
66mx8.name.com207
67mx3.name.com206
68mx4.name.com206
69mx7.name.com205
70mx6.name.com205
71mx5.name.com205
72allmail.parklogic.com205
73mail.b-io.co204
74mx2.mailhop.org201
75mx.orangegeek.net199
76cluster.relay.agava.net197
77mxgw1.mail.nationalnet.com184
78mxgw2.mail.nationalnet.com183
79mxa.expurgate.de180
80mail1.sbnation.com177
81mx.smtp.cz176
82altmx2.orangegeek.net173
83altmx3.orangegeek.net172
84in.smtp.cz169
85inbound.mail.naiadsystems.com164
86inbound.registeredsite.com164
87mforward.dtag.de163
88mx.ct.mbox.net159
89webmail1.sitebuildit.com155
90mailforward.dnsv.jp153
91domain.not.configured151
92mx3.peterhost.ru149
93mx-proxy501.heteml.jp148
94mx2.peterhost.ru148
95mx-proxy502.heteml.jp147
96mx.cm.hc.ru145
97mx2.advancedhosters.com144
98mx1.advancedhosters.com143
99igw5002.site4now.net140
100mailin1.rmx.de139

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1bluehost.com6 978
2outlook.com1 999
3cmail1.com1 994
4spf.mail.intercom.io1 444
5hotmail.com1 082
6mxlogic.net1 063
7hostmonster.com1 057
8_spf.heteml.jp1 049
9infusionmail.com862
10beget.ru819
11spf.secure.ne.jp752
12icpbounce.com728
13justhost.com681
14salesforce.com680
15_spf-client-servers.sitesellmail.com618
16nicmail.ru594
17smtp1.uservoice.com594
18sharepointonline.com591
19_spf.zdsys.com574
20spf2.auinmeio.com.br566
21spf1.auinmeio.com.br564
22spf.whservidor.com547
23spf.hostmar.com535
24msgfocus.com503
25_spf.websupport.sk501
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.messaging.microsoft.com488
27gmail.com486
28google.com478
29spf.263xmail.com415
30gridhost.co.uk403
31spf.masterbase.com394
32netcore.co.in384
33outboundmail.convio.net382
34spf.linuxpl.com371
35_spfcls.natrohost.com367
36_spf.uni5.net358
37turbo-smtp.com350
38spf.serveriai.lt343
39mailcontrol.com342
40spf.virtualtarget.com.br334
41spf.tld.pl333
42_spf.anpdm.com329
43_senderspf.copernica.com324
44ncfp.asia324
45spf.mailengine1.com320
46_spf.zenbox.pl320
47mh.blackboard.com315
48jangomail.com306
49spfgw.fsi.ne.jp297
50emsmtp.com295
51e2ma.net291
52spf.securemx.jp286
53relays.webhost-mail.com285
54spf.postini.com276
55bmsend.com275
56rhostbh.com272
57spf.autopilothq.com268
58datadrivenemail.com266
59smtp.groovehq.com259
60spf.dondominio.com258
61spf.shopback.com.br257
62bluehornet.com252
63spf.bserver.jp243
64eblastengine.com243
65spf.clearslide.com242
66spf.futoka.jp242
67spf.repica.jp241
68rnmk.com239
69_spf.srv.cat236
70spf.aams4.jp236
71spf.maropost.com230
72spf001.shop-pro.jp228
73mailplus.nl224
74spf.shopserve.jp222
75_netblocks.google.com222
76_spfcls.natrohost.net220
77spf.protection.3dcart.com220
78_spf.act-on.net218
79spf.sendcloud.org213
80messaging-master.com212
81spf.alpha-prm.jp211
82smtproutes.com209
83veinteractive.biz208
84spf.digitalinsight.com208
851lejend.com200
86smtpout.com195
87activetrail.com190
88email-od.com186
89spf.haihaimail.jp186
90aweber.com184
91spf.dominioabsoluto.net184
92spf.usa.net183
93_spf.loading.es182
94spf.tricorn.net180
95smp.ne.jp176
96crmstyle.com176
97_spf.turhost.com175
98_spf.daum.net171
99spf.emailmanager.com169
100_spf.staysecuregroup.com169

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot, produced by the OpenINTEL project (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list (https://tranco-list.eu/) daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet.

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample

We process the snapshot for a single date (the latest available, typically <24h delay) covering the entire Tranco top-1M list. No sub-sampling; every domain queried by OpenINTEL is included.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets below for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP (mass-mailing service) classification

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against an open dictionary (dictionaries/esps.py). One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously (e.g. SendGrid + Mailchimp), so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

Note: this method does not count "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IPs to fit the 10-lookup limit) — those domains will appear as ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used. This is a known limitation of any DNS-only methodology and is consistent across competitive surveys.

5. DMARC

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for p= (policy) and pct= (percentage covered). A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent, which defaults to 100).

6. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k, top-10k, top-100k, top-1M, or unranked if absent from the list at scan time.

7. Reproducibility

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept here (per OpenINTEL data agreement).

8. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented.
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see §4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (e.g. some Mimecast/Proofpoint customers use their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-04-28 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF2018-05-01 — 1 168 881 MX, 732 275 SPF2018-04-01 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2018-03-01 — 827 056 MX, 516 103 SPF2018-02-01 — 1 195 663 MX, 725 044 SPF2018-01-01 — 813 525 MX, 512 876 SPF2017-12-01 — 818 419 MX, 513 903 SPF2017-11-01 — 815 080 MX, 507 477 SPF2017-10-01 — 823 380 MX, 508 173 SPF2017-09-01 — 815 671 MX, 500 347 SPF2017-08-01 — 829 376 MX, 505 516 SPF2017-07-01 — 830 824 MX, 502 438 SPF2017-06-01 — 828 635 MX, 497 007 SPF2017-05-01 — 828 210 MX, 493 097 SPF2017-04-01 — 828 454 MX, 490 217 SPF2017-03-01 — 824 804 MX, 483 151 SPF2017-02-01 — 839 476 MX, 482 733 SPF2017-01-01 — 827 995 MX, 470 990 SPF2016-12-01 — 825 158 MX, 467 480 SPF2016-11-01 — 837 849 MX, 472 624 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2016-10-01. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-04-29T18:10:44Z.