Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2026-05-30.

663 036
Domains with MX
622 559
Domains with SPF
455 572
Domains with DMARC
663 036
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted →151 85622.9%
2Google Workspace →143 47221.64%
3Microsoft 365 →111 05616.75%
4Unknown / Other →51 5257.77%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) →18 3422.77%
6Proofpoint →12 8251.93%
7Yandex 360 →11 5721.75%
8Generic / unmatched (mail.*) →11 4171.72%
9Mimecast →10 5591.59%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 1691.53%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Hostinger →6 9411.05%
12Zoho Mail →6 6431.0%
13Namecheap Email Forwarding →6 4530.97%
14QQ Mail (Tencent) →5 1740.78%
15GoDaddy →4 8660.73%
16Amazon WorkMail →4 8090.73%
17OVH Mail →4 4790.68%
18Mail.ru for Business →3 8940.59%
19Barracuda →3 6340.55%
201&1 IONOS →3 3320.5%
21Cisco IronPort →2 9430.44%
22Proofpoint Essentials →2 8390.43%
23SpamExperts (SolarWinds) →2 8090.42%
24Mailgun (inbound) →2 3270.35%
25Jellyfish (Namecheap) →2 3240.35%
26Rackspace Email →2 3220.35%
27Beget (RU) →2 2470.34%
28Alibaba Mail (China) →1 9550.29%
29Zoho Mail (EU) →1 7010.26%
30ProtonMail →1 6000.24%
🏠 Open Providers portfolio → cards with country, blurb, sparkline & TLD breakdown — click any provider name above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
12.41%
82 310 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
37 037
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
22.93%
152 036 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Amazon SES →38 4376.17%
2SendGrid (Twilio) →29 9184.81%
3Mailgun →25 4984.1%
4Zendesk →24 2833.9%
5Mailchimp →23 2633.74%
6Mandrill →21 2193.41%
7HubSpot →19 9223.2%
8Salesforce →16 5742.66%
9Mailjet (Sinch) →13 2452.13%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 7711.73%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast →9 1941.48%
12Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) →8 7041.4%
13MailerSend →7 8261.26%
14Namecheap Forwarding →6 7211.08%
15MailChannels →6 6501.07%
16Elastic Email →4 4160.71%
17Unisender (RU) →3 8170.61%
18Constant Contact →3 6390.58%
19Campaign Monitor →3 4720.56%
20Marketo (Adobe) →3 3540.54%
21Zoho Campaigns →3 2100.52%
22Emsd1 (transactional) →3 0520.49%
23SendPulse →2 9460.47%
24Postmark →2 9380.47%
25Exclaimer (signatures) →2 6890.43%
26SparkPost →2 6840.43%
27Zoho ZeptoMail →2 6580.43%
28Help Scout →2 3670.38%
29Barracuda Essentials →2 2510.36%
30Salesforce Marketing Cloud →2 2470.36%
📮 Open Mailing services portfolio → all detected ESPs with descriptions, country, sparklines — click any ESP above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Shopify →5 0720.81%
2Pardot (Salesforce) →5 0570.81%
3CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 →4 4610.72%
4KnowBe4 →3 5770.57%
5Statuspage (Atlassian) →2 1630.35%
6Trustpilot →1 9250.31%
7Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) →1 8960.3%
8Firebase (Google) →1 7650.28%
9Lark / Feishu →1 2740.2%
10BigCommerce →1 2080.19%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle) →1 1520.19%
12Sage Intacct →1 1340.18%
13Qualtrics →1 1090.18%
14Oracle Cloud Email →1 0600.17%
15Docebo (LMS) →9320.15%
16WordPress.com / WP Cloud →8910.14%
17Oracle Cloud →8440.14%
18One.com (DK hosting) →7980.13%
19Zoho Books →7290.12%
20AFAS →6620.11%
21Greenhouse →6380.1%
22SAP SuccessFactors →6070.1%
23ClickDimensions →5920.1%
24PayPal Braintree →5900.09%
25UKG / UltiPro →5670.09%
26Autotask (ConnectWise) →5330.09%
27ConnectWise →5020.08%
28TOPdesk →4760.08%
29Freshservice (Freshworks) →4510.07%
30FormAssembly →4440.07%
📧 Open SaaS/ESP senders portfolio → SaaS apps sending FROM customer domains — click any SaaS name above for detail

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.31%30d ago▲ +0.26%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;54 848
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 475
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 238
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 886
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 909
6v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 798
7v=DMARC1;p=none;3 690
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 205
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 124
10v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;2 965
11v=DMARC1; p=reject2 899
12v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 666
13v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 439
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 043
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;2 041
16v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 892
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 735
18v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 729
19v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 441
20v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 406
21v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 342
22v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 328
23v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 286
24v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 273
25v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 204
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 053
27v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 027
28v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 010
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;987
30v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com957
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s910
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com876
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email765
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com738
35v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100696
36v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100695
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400689
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com652
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com616
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400550
42v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;511
43v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;511
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;508
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com503
46v=DMARC1;p=quarantine499
47v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;455
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;448
49v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s445
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1435
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;435
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:desjardins@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:desjardins@ruf.agari.com;380
53v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r368
54v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r363
55v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com353
56v=DMARC1;p=reject346
57v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;343
58v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;342
59v=DMARC1332
60v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400325
61v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1315
62v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;314
63v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100307
64v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;304
65v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s300
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;284
67v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400274
68v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com270
69v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1269
70v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r264
71v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100251
72v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;250
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com242
74v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;230
75v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp223
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com214
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com213
78v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;208
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com205
80v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r205
81v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;204
82v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject198
83v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email195
84v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app194
85v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;189
86v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com185
87v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl182
88v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;179
89v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com178
90v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;178
91v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;177
92v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100177
93v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;175
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r174
95v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;170
96v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1167
97v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r;166
98v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100166
99v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s161
100v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400159

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1nan4 853
2localhost439
3mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net311
4asapsemi1.mail.protection.office365.us283
5mx.services256
6mail247
7mx01.1and1.com201
8mx00.1and1.com196
9mail1.sbnation.com169
10zonemx.eu162
11mail.autoline.com.ua159
12~158
13mx2.z-ns.net158
14alltheemails.com148
15mx.email-messaging.com142
16uk.mx1.mailanyone.net122
17uk.mx2.mx25.net122
18mxi.alpha-prm.jp120
19uk.mx3.mailanyone.net120
20relay1.netnames.net116
21relay2.netnames.net116
22uk.mx4.mx25.net116
23mx.simply.com115
24se.mx1.mailanyone.net114
25se.mx2.mx25.net114
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx1.ticketsinbound.com112
27se.mx3.mailanyone.net109
28mx2.ticketsinbound.com109
29s.mail.dcsaas.net109
30se.mx4.mx25.net108
31mx240.umbler.co.uk108
32mx10.websupport.sk107
33mx20.websupport.sk107
34mx364.umbler.com107
35mx1.cleanmx.pt105
36mwpremgw1.ocn.ad.jp104
37mwpremgw2.ocn.ad.jp104
38mx00.1and1.co.uk103
39mx2.cleanmx.pt103
40mx1d10.thinline.cz103
41mx1b20.thinline.cz103
42mx01.lancloud.ru103
43mx02.lancloud.ru103
44mx04.lancloud.ru103
45mx01.1and1.co.uk101
46mx03.lancloud.ru101
47mx.nothing-sus.com100
48void.blackhole.mx100
49cloudmail.auto-vision.ru99
50mx01.mailplug.com97
51mx.zoho.com.au97
52mx2.zoho.com.au97
53mailin.mx-hub.cz97
54mailin.mx-hub.sk97
55mx02.mailplug.com96
56mx3.zoho.com.au96
57lbmx.bcc.gov.bd96
58mailin.mx-hub.eu92
59amazon-smtp.amazon.com86
60mx-backup.serveriai.lt86
61mailforward.dnsv.jp84
62mx1.email-cluster.com84
63mx2.email-cluster.com84
64mx1-dk.centerasecurity.dk82
65mx2-dk.centerasecurity.dk82
66mx.zoho.com.cn82
67mx1.atmosphere.facct.ru81
68mx2.atmosphere.facct.ru81
69mx2.zoho.com.cn81
70mx-01.mail-forwarder.io81
71failover1.email-cluster.com81
72mx.hetemail.jp80
73smtp-fwd.wordpress.com80
74mx3.name.com79
75antispam1.ihs.com.tr79
76antispam2.ihs.com.tr79
77mx.maxns.net79
78mx-02.mail-forwarder.io79
79mx4.name.com78
80mx6.name.com77
81mx5.name.com77
82mx8.name.com77
83sitemail.everyone.net77
84mx-proxy501.heteml.jp77
85mx7.name.com76
86mxint01.1and1.com76
87mxint02.1and1.com76
88mx3-dk.centerasecurity.dk76
89mx-proxy502.heteml.jp75
90mail.global.frontbridge.com75
91offline.iserv.eu74
92mx01.1and1.fr73
93mx00.1and1.fr72
94mx.vshosting.eu72
95mx6.kvnbw.de72
96mx7.kvnbw.de72
97mx8.kvnbw.de72
98mx9.kvnbw.de72
99mx1.netim.net71
100mx2.netim.net71

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1spf.pitcom.net111
2qcloudmail.com111
3_spf.maileroo.com110
4spf.kirim.email109
5_spf.exsilia.net106
6_spf.armada.it106
7spf.ssmx.net105
8gateways.firstdata.com105
9yunyou.top104
10_spf.octadesk.com103
11spf-00181c02.pphosted.com103
12_spf.mail-neoserv.si103
13outbound.smtp.wisestamp.net103
14spf-2248456.jmsend.com102
15mlrcloud.com102
16spf.v6send.net102
17spf.boldem.cz101
18_spf.wpopt.net101
19spf.betrend.com101
20relay.thundermail.uk100
21_pmta2.antevenio.com100
22_spf.presscloud.com99
23_spf01.mykronos.com99
24spf.mailcamp.nl98
25spf.spcloud.jp97
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.splio.com97
27ofsys.com96
28spfref.jackhenry.com96
29spf.satorimail.net96
30spf.263.net95
31_spf.academicworks.com95
32fmx.etius.jp94
33spf.aams4.jp94
34spf.cesky-hosting.cz94
35amazon.com94
36mailing.eqs.com93
37usermail.zohocreator.com93
38spf.cyberimpact.com92
39_spf.sendnode.com92
40_spf-dc10.sapsf.com92
41smtp-cluster.plusvps.com92
42send.k-crm.jp92
43_spf.localservices.com.br92
44spf.emailfilter.io91
45spf.greengeeks.net91
46mfg.siteprotect.com91
47no-ip.com91
48spf.squalomail.com91
49_spf.webglobe.cz91
50relay.email-cluster.com91
51_spf.sent2email.com91
52_spf.simpleviewinc.com91
53_spf.edhost.eu91
54_spf.aid.no91
55eversrv.com90
56spf.qb-feedback.com90
57spf.redpoints.com90
58spf-002fa101.pphosted.com90
59_spf.ogicom.pl90
60sendgrid.com90
61spf.sendios.io90
62_spf.abcp.ru90
63verifymyfafsa.com90
64_spf.tld-mx.com89
65spf.symplicity.com89
66ciphr247.com89
67spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl89
68spf.oximailing.com89
69mailmailmail.net88
70spf.remarkety.com88
71spf.w4ymail.at87
72spf.icontroller.eu87
73spf.w2solution.com87
74spf.shared.spaceship.host86
75spf86
76_spf.eemsg.mail.mil86
77relay.guzelhosting.com85
78_spf.we.wedos.net85
79senders.mailmasterplus.net85
80spf.host-ww.net84
81spf.sosafe.de84
82universalspf.org84
83spf-00596a01.pphosted.com84
84spf-bulk.axa.com83
85spf.pantheon.io83
86spf.esvacloud.com83
87mail.feedblitz.com83
88x.universalspf.org83
89spf.shopserve.jp83
90_spf.shared-server.net82
91_spf.paytsoftware.com82
92spf-0024c501.pphosted.com82
93spf.qboxmail.com82
94euromsg.net81
95mail.zohoanalytics.com80
96support.gov.sg80
97spf.protection.outlook80
98_spf.zorgmail.nl80
99_spf.lh.pl80
100_spf.superlogica.com80

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet. For pre-2022 history we additionally use OpenINTEL's alexa source (the legacy Alexa top-1M list, retired 2023).

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample & cadence

Each report covers a single date — the latest OpenINTEL snapshot with <24h delay, typically ~700 k domains with MX records and ~620 k with SPF. The pipeline runs daily at 23:00 Europe/Moscow; each daily run produces an HTML report, a JSON summary, an updated time-series, and incremental updates to the domain registry (§ 12). No sub-sampling.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py, currently ~310 patterns). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP / SaaS / forwarder / gateway classification (SPF-based)

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against open classification dictionaries (ESPs, mailbox-as-sender, anti-spam gateways, forwarders, SaaS senders, DMARC vendors, NS providers, verification tokens).

Resolution order: PURE_ESP → MAILBOX_AS_SENDER → GATEWAYS → FORWARDERS → bare-apex substring fallback → SAAS_SENDERS substring iteration. Bare-apex derivation strips leading _spf., _spf-eu., spf., mail. prefixes from dict keys to catch subdomain variants (e.g. _spf.m1.websupport.sk → matches websupport.sk). Malformed includes (no dot, <4 chars) are filtered.

One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously, so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains. Current SPF-include classification coverage: ~81.5% (up from ~38.5% baseline).

Limitation: "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IP ranges to fit the 10-lookup limit) is not detectable from DNS alone — those domains appear ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used.

5. DMARC (deep)

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for:

  • p= (apex policy): none / quarantine / reject / invalid
  • sp= (subdomain policy)
  • pct= (rollout percentage)
  • rua= aggregate-report destinations → classified into vendor buckets (Postmark DMARC, Valimail, dmarcian, URIports, EasyDMARC, Red Sift, Proofpoint EFD, Agari/Fortra, …) using dictionaries/dmarc_vendors.py

A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent — defaults to 100).

6. SPF mechanics & health

For every SPF record we additionally extract:

  • Final qualifier on the all mechanism: -all (hard fail), ~all (soft fail), ?all (neutral), +all (pass-everything — broken / dangerous), or missing
  • DNS lookup count (include:, redirect=, a:, mx:, exists:, ptr:) — each mechanism counts as 1 against the spec limit of 10. Records exceeding the limit return PermErr at recipients
  • Mechanism mix: include-only (modern), raw IP4/IP6 ranges only (legacy/flattened), mixed
  • Record byte length: percentiles to flag fragmentation risk (>450 B)

7. Email security maturity

Adoption of modern mail-security TXT records, parsed from the same OpenINTEL parquet:

  • MTA-STS: TXT at _mta-sts.<domain> with v=STSv1 — domain advertises required-TLS to its MX
  • BIMI: TXT at default._bimi.<domain> with v=BIMI1 — brand publishes a verified logo (requires p=reject)
  • TLS-RPT (SMTP TLS Reporting): TXT at _smtp._tls.<domain> with v=TLSRPTv1 — domain monitors TLS-failure reports
  • DKIM selectors: where the OpenINTEL scan includes *._domainkey.<domain> queries, well-known selectors (google, selector1/2, s1/s2, k1/k2/k3, mailo, mte1, …) are mapped to issuing ESPs

8. DNS provider classification

For each domain's NS RRset, every NS hostname is matched against a suffix dictionary (dictionaries/ns_providers.py) with patterns for Cloudflare, AWS Route 53, Azure DNS, Google Cloud DNS, GoDaddy, Akamai, NS1, UltraDNS, Yandex, DNSPod, Aliyun, OVH, Hetzner, Gandi, registrars, and others. A domain is assigned to its dominant NS provider; ties resolve to whichever pattern was matched first.

9. SaaS-via-verification-tokens

Many SaaS apps a domain is connected to never appear in SPF (because the SaaS doesn't send mail FROM the customer domain). To recover this signal we parse apex TXT records for verification tokens — google-site-verification=…, MS=…, atlassian-domain-verification=…, stripe-verification=…, plus ~70 other patterns in dictionaries/verification_tokens.py. This produces a complementary "SaaS density" metric and surfaces apps that the SPF-only view misses.

10. Email infrastructure modernity

Three additional TLS / IPv6 metrics:

  • IPv6-on-MX: MX hostname has at least one AAAA record
  • DANE / TLSA on MX: TLSA record at _25._tcp.<mx_host> (where the parquet includes TLSA queries)
  • CAA: any 0 issue … / 0 issuewild … record at apex; CAs aggregated into a market-share view (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Sectigo, …)

11. Cross-tabulations

  • Country × ESP heatmap: top-15 ccTLDs × top-15 ESPs, cell = % of country's SPF-publishing domains using ESP X. Surfaces regional ESP champions (Brevo / FR, Unisender / RU, MailerLite / LT, Akna / BR, Shoptet / CZ).
  • Mailbox × ESP combinations: stacked frequency of common stack pairings (Google Workspace + HubSpot, MS365 + Marketo, …).

12. Domain registry & identifiers

Every domain ever observed across snapshots is assigned a stable integer ID in /var/openintel-cache/registry/domains.sqlite3 (currently ~1.2 M domains). Reports reference domains by ID rather than embedding strings; clients resolve names from a single gzipped registry dump (/email-stats/domains.csv.gz, ~13 MB). This keeps per-report payloads compact, enables fast set-operation diffs across snapshots, and gives every domain a first-seen / last-seen timestamp.

13. Daily change-alerts feed

Each daily run computes a domain-level diff vs the previous scan and emits a change-feed at /email-stats/alerts.html (also as JSON + Atom). Detected events: ESP added/removed in SPF, DMARC policy upgrade/downgrade, primary-mailbox-provider change, SPF strict→soft regression, MTA-STS / BIMI first publication. Severity tag is good / bad / info.

14. Per-entity detail pages

The top-100 ESPs, top-100 SaaS senders and top-80 mailbox providers each have a dedicated detail page at /email-stats/detail/<kind>/<slug>.html showing KPI cards, a Chart.js sparkline (from history.json), TLD distribution and a sample of customer domains.

15. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k / top-10k / top-100k / top-1M / unranked.

16. Reproducibility & data hygiene

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary file hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept long-term (per OpenINTEL data agreement). The domain registry stores names but no record-level content.

17. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented. The alexa source used for pre-2022 history has a different composition (~960 k domains, US-heavier).
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see § 4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (Mimecast/Proofpoint customers using their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.
  • DKIM enumeration is selector-based — only domains whose well-known selectors are scanned by OpenINTEL appear in the DKIM layer.
  • Long-tail unmatched: ~18.5% of SPF includes belong to a long tail of regional hosters (~84 k unique singletons). This is a fundamental ceiling of any dictionary-based method — filling it would require manual research of 1500+ providers.
  • Newly-added dictionary entries have no historical sparkline until ≥ 2 daily scans accumulate, since archived raw parquet is purged after parsing per the OpenINTEL data agreement.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-05-29 — 663 271 MX, 622 553 SPF2026-05-28 — 663 075 MX, 622 229 SPF2026-05-27 — 663 040 MX, 621 877 SPF2026-05-23 — 660 587 MX, 620 034 SPF2026-05-22 — 657 556 MX, 617 016 SPF2026-05-21 — 659 930 MX, 619 421 SPF2026-05-20 — 659 568 MX, 618 994 SPF2026-05-19 — 661 300 MX, 620 621 SPF2026-05-18 — 653 826 MX, 613 816 SPF2026-05-17 — 652 834 MX, 613 060 SPF2026-05-16 — 653 289 MX, 613 507 SPF2026-05-15 — 653 883 MX, 614 025 SPF2026-05-14 — 654 606 MX, 614 742 SPF2026-05-13 — 654 450 MX, 614 641 SPF2026-05-12 — 654 613 MX, 614 806 SPF2026-05-11 — 654 275 MX, 614 529 SPF2026-05-10 — 654 198 MX, 614 496 SPF2026-05-09 — 654 965 MX, 615 249 SPF2026-05-08 — 664 721 MX, 624 279 SPF2026-05-07 — 662 493 MX, 622 130 SPF2026-05-06 — 661 868 MX, 621 451 SPF2026-05-05 — 662 628 MX, 622 150 SPF2026-05-04 — 662 839 MX, 622 414 SPF2026-05-03 — 671 505 MX, 630 301 SPF2026-05-02 — 666 074 MX, 625 213 SPF2026-05-01 — 664 902 MX, 624 104 SPF2026-04-30 — 665 325 MX, 624 448 SPF2026-04-29 — 665 578 MX, 624 625 SPF2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF2018-05-01 — 1 168 881 MX, 732 275 SPF2018-04-01 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2018-03-01 — 827 056 MX, 516 103 SPF2018-02-01 — 1 195 663 MX, 725 044 SPF2018-01-01 — 813 525 MX, 512 876 SPF2017-12-01 — 818 419 MX, 513 903 SPF2017-11-01 — 815 080 MX, 507 477 SPF2017-10-01 — 823 380 MX, 508 173 SPF2017-09-01 — 815 671 MX, 500 347 SPF2017-08-01 — 829 376 MX, 505 516 SPF2017-07-01 — 830 824 MX, 502 438 SPF2017-06-01 — 828 635 MX, 497 007 SPF2017-05-01 — 828 210 MX, 493 097 SPF2017-04-01 — 828 454 MX, 490 217 SPF2017-03-01 — 824 804 MX, 483 151 SPF2017-02-01 — 839 476 MX, 482 733 SPF2017-01-01 — 827 995 MX, 470 990 SPF2016-12-01 — 825 158 MX, 467 480 SPF2016-11-01 — 837 849 MX, 472 624 SPF2016-10-01 — 838 377 MX, 469 807 SPF2016-09-01 — 835 089 MX, 462 936 SPF2016-08-01 — 848 095 MX, 469 528 SPF2016-07-01 — 842 098 MX, 463 893 SPF2016-06-01 — 848 829 MX, 462 786 SPF2016-05-01 — 843 824 MX, 455 820 SPF2016-04-01 — 843 843 MX, 449 460 SPF2016-03-01 — 865 090 MX, 456 873 SPF2016-02-01 — 862 585 MX, 450 683 SPF2016-01-22 — 845 356 MX, 440 606 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2026-05-30. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-05-31T21:05:15Z.