Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2026-05-31.

667 641
Domains with MX
626 984
Domains with SPF
458 655
Domains with DMARC
667 641
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted →153 06922.93%
2Google Workspace →144 35121.62%
3Microsoft 365 →111 57116.71%
4Unknown / Other →51 7977.76%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) →18 4882.77%
6Proofpoint →12 8261.92%
7Yandex 360 →11 5741.73%
8Generic / unmatched (mail.*) →11 4561.72%
9Mimecast →10 5491.58%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 2571.54%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Hostinger →7 2761.09%
12Zoho Mail →6 7501.01%
13Namecheap Email Forwarding →6 5950.99%
14QQ Mail (Tencent) →5 1800.78%
15GoDaddy →4 9770.75%
16Amazon WorkMail →4 8430.73%
17OVH Mail →4 5370.68%
18Mail.ru for Business →3 8960.58%
19Barracuda →3 6280.54%
201&1 IONOS →3 3780.51%
21Cisco IronPort →2 9770.45%
22Proofpoint Essentials →2 8360.42%
23SpamExperts (SolarWinds) →2 8320.42%
24Jellyfish (Namecheap) →2 3780.36%
25Mailgun (inbound) →2 3460.35%
26Rackspace Email →2 3260.35%
27Beget (RU) →2 2470.34%
28Alibaba Mail (China) →1 9500.29%
29Zoho Mail (EU) →1 7120.26%
30Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) →1 6280.24%
🏠 Open Providers portfolio → cards with country, blurb, sparkline & TLD breakdown — click any provider name above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
12.4%
82 768 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
37 187
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
22.95%
153 249 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Amazon SES →38 6016.16%
2SendGrid (Twilio) →29 9924.78%
3Mailgun →25 6174.09%
4Zendesk →24 3043.88%
5Mailchimp →23 2903.71%
6Mandrill →21 2333.39%
7HubSpot →19 9193.18%
8Salesforce →16 5622.64%
9Mailjet (Sinch) →13 2952.12%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 8631.73%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast →9 1791.46%
12Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) →8 7471.4%
13MailerSend →7 8731.26%
14Namecheap Forwarding →6 8641.09%
15MailChannels →6 7631.08%
16Elastic Email →4 4630.71%
17Unisender (RU) →3 8110.61%
18Constant Contact →3 6330.58%
19Campaign Monitor →3 4710.55%
20Marketo (Adobe) →3 3510.53%
21Zoho Campaigns →3 2140.51%
22Emsd1 (transactional) →3 0600.49%
23SendPulse →2 9580.47%
24Postmark →2 9530.47%
25SparkPost →2 6970.43%
26Exclaimer (signatures) →2 6920.43%
27Zoho ZeptoMail →2 6700.43%
28Help Scout →2 3630.38%
29Salesforce Marketing Cloud →2 2540.36%
30Barracuda Essentials →2 2500.36%
📮 Open Mailing services portfolio → all detected ESPs with descriptions, country, sparklines — click any ESP above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Shopify →5 0980.81%
2Pardot (Salesforce) →5 0510.81%
3CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 →4 4590.71%
4KnowBe4 →3 5780.57%
5Statuspage (Atlassian) →2 1630.34%
6Trustpilot →1 9350.31%
7Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) →1 8910.3%
8Firebase (Google) →1 7730.28%
9Lark / Feishu →1 2790.2%
10BigCommerce →1 2160.19%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle) →1 1500.18%
12Sage Intacct →1 1320.18%
13Qualtrics →1 1090.18%
14Oracle Cloud Email →1 0610.17%
15Docebo (LMS) →9300.15%
16WordPress.com / WP Cloud →9060.14%
17Oracle Cloud →8380.13%
18One.com (DK hosting) →8020.13%
19Zoho Books →7270.12%
20AFAS →6610.11%
21Greenhouse →6380.1%
22SAP SuccessFactors →6090.1%
23ClickDimensions →5920.09%
24PayPal Braintree →5900.09%
25UKG / UltiPro →5670.09%
26Autotask (ConnectWise) →5310.08%
27ConnectWise →4960.08%
28TOPdesk →4790.08%
29Freshservice (Freshworks) →4510.07%
30FormAssembly →4440.07%
📧 Open SaaS/ESP senders portfolio → SaaS apps sending FROM customer domains — click any SaaS name above for detail

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.35%30d ago▲ +0.28%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;55 589
2v=DMARC1; p=none32 046
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 357
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 905
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 925
6v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 813
7v=DMARC1;p=none;3 749
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 208
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 170
10v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;3 084
11v=DMARC1; p=reject2 909
12v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 695
13v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 383
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 063
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;1 988
16v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 907
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 757
18v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 740
19v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 460
20v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 407
21v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 350
22v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 329
23v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 296
24v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 269
25v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 226
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 092
27v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 046
28v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 015
29v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;997
30v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com955
31v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s912
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com876
33v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email769
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com723
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100699
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100696
37v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400693
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com656
39v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com617
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com611
41v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400551
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;551
43v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;512
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;509
45v=DMARC1;p=quarantine505
46v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com504
47v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:desjardins@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:desjardins@ruf.agari.com;481
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;455
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;451
50v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s445
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1434
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;433
53v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r376
54v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r367
55v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com351
56v=DMARC1;p=reject345
57v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;345
58v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;343
59v=DMARC1339
60v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400331
61v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1319
62v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;318
63v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100312
64v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;305
65v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s299
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;296
67v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400275
68v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r271
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com270
70v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1268
71v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100255
72v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;254
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com243
74v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;232
75v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp228
76v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;216
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com214
78v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com213
79v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r207
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;206
81v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com204
82v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email202
83v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app202
84v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject199
85v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;189
86v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl189
87v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com186
88v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100184
89v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com181
90v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;180
91v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;179
92v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;177
93v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;176
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r175
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1174
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;172
97v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r;166
98v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100165
99v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s161
100v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1nan4 789
2localhost429
3mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net313
4asapsemi1.mail.protection.office365.us281
5mx.services264
6mail247
7mx01.1and1.com202
8mx00.1and1.com197
9mail1.sbnation.com168
10~166
11zonemx.eu162
12mail.autoline.com.ua159
13mx2.z-ns.net158
14alltheemails.com148
15mx.email-messaging.com144
16uk.mx1.mailanyone.net123
17uk.mx2.mx25.net123
18mxi.alpha-prm.jp121
19uk.mx3.mailanyone.net121
20mx.simply.com118
21relay1.netnames.net117
22relay2.netnames.net117
23uk.mx4.mx25.net117
24s.mail.dcsaas.net117
25se.mx1.mailanyone.net113
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26se.mx2.mx25.net113
27mx1.ticketsinbound.com112
28mx240.umbler.co.uk110
29mx10.websupport.sk109
30mx20.websupport.sk109
31mx2.ticketsinbound.com109
32mx364.umbler.com109
33se.mx3.mailanyone.net108
34se.mx4.mx25.net107
35mx1.cleanmx.pt105
36mwpremgw1.ocn.ad.jp105
37mwpremgw2.ocn.ad.jp105
38mx1d10.thinline.cz104
39mx1b20.thinline.cz104
40mx00.1and1.co.uk103
41mx2.cleanmx.pt103
42mx01.lancloud.ru103
43mx02.lancloud.ru103
44mx04.lancloud.ru103
45mx01.1and1.co.uk101
46mx03.lancloud.ru101
47mx.nothing-sus.com100
48void.blackhole.mx100
49cloudmail.auto-vision.ru99
50mx.zoho.com.au98
51mx2.zoho.com.au98
52mailin.mx-hub.cz98
53mailin.mx-hub.sk98
54lbmx.bcc.gov.bd98
55mx01.mailplug.com97
56mx3.zoho.com.au97
57mx02.mailplug.com96
58mailin.mx-hub.eu93
59mx-backup.serveriai.lt87
60amazon-smtp.amazon.com86
61mailforward.dnsv.jp85
62mx1-dk.centerasecurity.dk83
63mx2-dk.centerasecurity.dk83
64mx.zoho.com.cn83
65mx-01.mail-forwarder.io83
66mx.hetemail.jp82
67mx2.zoho.com.cn82
68mx1.email-cluster.com82
69mx2.email-cluster.com82
70mx1.atmosphere.facct.ru81
71mx2.atmosphere.facct.ru81
72mx-02.mail-forwarder.io81
73antispam1.ihs.com.tr80
74antispam2.ihs.com.tr80
75mx.maxns.net80
76smtp-fwd.wordpress.com80
77mx3.name.com79
78mx-proxy501.heteml.jp79
79failover1.email-cluster.com79
80mx4.name.com78
81mx6.name.com77
82mx5.name.com77
83mx8.name.com77
84sitemail.everyone.net77
85mx-proxy502.heteml.jp77
86mx.aams4.jp77
87mx3-dk.centerasecurity.dk77
88mx7.name.com76
89mxint01.1and1.com76
90mxint02.1and1.com76
91mx1.netim.net75
92mx2.netim.net75
93mail.global.frontbridge.com75
94mx-0.aams4.jp74
95mx-1.aams4.jp74
96mx01.1and1.fr73
97offline.iserv.eu73
98mx00.1and1.fr72
99mail.parktons.com72
100smtp-avas.seeweb.it72

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1_spf.maileroo.com111
2spf.kirim.email111
3spf.pitcom.net111
4qcloudmail.com110
5_spf.armada.it109
6spf.boldem.cz108
7_spf.exsilia.net106
8spf.ssmx.net105
9gateways.firstdata.com105
10_spf.mail-neoserv.si105
11yunyou.top105
12_pmta2.antevenio.com103
13outbound.smtp.wisestamp.net103
14spf-2248456.jmsend.com102
15spf.v6send.net102
16spf.betrend.com102
17_spf.octadesk.com102
18mlrcloud.com101
19_spf.wpopt.net101
20relay.thundermail.uk100
21spf.aams4.jp100
22_spf01.mykronos.com99
23spf-00181c02.pphosted.com98
24_spf.presscloud.com98
25spf.mailcamp.nl98
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.splio.com98
27spfref.jackhenry.com97
28spf.satorimail.net97
29ofsys.com96
30_spf.localservices.com.br96
31spf.spcloud.jp96
32_spf.academicworks.com95
33spf.263.net95
34spf.cesky-hosting.cz95
35send.k-crm.jp95
36spf.w4ymail.at95
37_spf.ogicom.pl94
38amazon.com94
39usermail.zohocreator.com93
40fmx.etius.jp93
41mailing.eqs.com93
42_spf.webglobe.cz92
43_spf-dc10.sapsf.com92
44spf.squalomail.com92
45spf.cyberimpact.com91
46eversrv.com91
47_spf.sendnode.com91
48relay.email-cluster.com91
49spf.greengeeks.net91
50spf.emailfilter.io91
51_spf.abcp.ru91
52smtp-cluster.plusvps.com91
53no-ip.com91
54_spf.sent2email.com91
55_spf.simpleviewinc.com91
56_spf.aid.no91
57_spf.edhost.eu91
58verifymyfafsa.com91
59mfg.siteprotect.com90
60_spf.tld-mx.com90
61spf.redpoints.com90
62spf-002fa101.pphosted.com90
63spf.qb-feedback.com90
64_spf.we.wedos.net90
65relay.guzelhosting.com90
66spf.shopserve.jp90
67spf.shared.spaceship.host89
68spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl89
69ciphr247.com89
70sendgrid.com89
71spf.sendios.io89
72spf.oximailing.com89
73spf.w2solution.com88
74spf.symplicity.com88
75spf.host-ww.net87
76spf.icontroller.eu87
77mailmailmail.net87
78spf87
79spf.remarkety.com86
80senders.mailmasterplus.net86
81_spf.eemsg.mail.mil85
82spf.sosafe.de84
83_spf.shared-server.net84
84spf-00596a01.pphosted.com84
85_spf.paytsoftware.com83
86universalspf.org83
87mail.feedblitz.com83
88_spf.lh.pl83
89spf-0024c501.pphosted.com82
90mail.zohoanalytics.com82
91x.universalspf.org82
92spf.pantheon.io82
93spf.qboxmail.com82
94euromsg.net82
95spf.esvacloud.com81
96spf.mail-komplet.cz81
97_spf.goskope.com80
98support.gov.sg80
99_spf.zorgmail.nl80
100_spf.superlogica.com80

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet. For pre-2022 history we additionally use OpenINTEL's alexa source (the legacy Alexa top-1M list, retired 2023).

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample & cadence

Each report covers a single date — the latest OpenINTEL snapshot with <24h delay, typically ~700 k domains with MX records and ~620 k with SPF. The pipeline runs daily at 23:00 Europe/Moscow; each daily run produces an HTML report, a JSON summary, an updated time-series, and incremental updates to the domain registry (§ 12). No sub-sampling.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py, currently ~310 patterns). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP / SaaS / forwarder / gateway classification (SPF-based)

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against open classification dictionaries (ESPs, mailbox-as-sender, anti-spam gateways, forwarders, SaaS senders, DMARC vendors, NS providers, verification tokens).

Resolution order: PURE_ESP → MAILBOX_AS_SENDER → GATEWAYS → FORWARDERS → bare-apex substring fallback → SAAS_SENDERS substring iteration. Bare-apex derivation strips leading _spf., _spf-eu., spf., mail. prefixes from dict keys to catch subdomain variants (e.g. _spf.m1.websupport.sk → matches websupport.sk). Malformed includes (no dot, <4 chars) are filtered.

One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously, so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains. Current SPF-include classification coverage: ~81.5% (up from ~38.5% baseline).

Limitation: "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IP ranges to fit the 10-lookup limit) is not detectable from DNS alone — those domains appear ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used.

5. DMARC (deep)

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for:

  • p= (apex policy): none / quarantine / reject / invalid
  • sp= (subdomain policy)
  • pct= (rollout percentage)
  • rua= aggregate-report destinations → classified into vendor buckets (Postmark DMARC, Valimail, dmarcian, URIports, EasyDMARC, Red Sift, Proofpoint EFD, Agari/Fortra, …) using dictionaries/dmarc_vendors.py

A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent — defaults to 100).

6. SPF mechanics & health

For every SPF record we additionally extract:

  • Final qualifier on the all mechanism: -all (hard fail), ~all (soft fail), ?all (neutral), +all (pass-everything — broken / dangerous), or missing
  • DNS lookup count (include:, redirect=, a:, mx:, exists:, ptr:) — each mechanism counts as 1 against the spec limit of 10. Records exceeding the limit return PermErr at recipients
  • Mechanism mix: include-only (modern), raw IP4/IP6 ranges only (legacy/flattened), mixed
  • Record byte length: percentiles to flag fragmentation risk (>450 B)

7. Email security maturity

Adoption of modern mail-security TXT records, parsed from the same OpenINTEL parquet:

  • MTA-STS: TXT at _mta-sts.<domain> with v=STSv1 — domain advertises required-TLS to its MX
  • BIMI: TXT at default._bimi.<domain> with v=BIMI1 — brand publishes a verified logo (requires p=reject)
  • TLS-RPT (SMTP TLS Reporting): TXT at _smtp._tls.<domain> with v=TLSRPTv1 — domain monitors TLS-failure reports
  • DKIM selectors: where the OpenINTEL scan includes *._domainkey.<domain> queries, well-known selectors (google, selector1/2, s1/s2, k1/k2/k3, mailo, mte1, …) are mapped to issuing ESPs

8. DNS provider classification

For each domain's NS RRset, every NS hostname is matched against a suffix dictionary (dictionaries/ns_providers.py) with patterns for Cloudflare, AWS Route 53, Azure DNS, Google Cloud DNS, GoDaddy, Akamai, NS1, UltraDNS, Yandex, DNSPod, Aliyun, OVH, Hetzner, Gandi, registrars, and others. A domain is assigned to its dominant NS provider; ties resolve to whichever pattern was matched first.

9. SaaS-via-verification-tokens

Many SaaS apps a domain is connected to never appear in SPF (because the SaaS doesn't send mail FROM the customer domain). To recover this signal we parse apex TXT records for verification tokens — google-site-verification=…, MS=…, atlassian-domain-verification=…, stripe-verification=…, plus ~70 other patterns in dictionaries/verification_tokens.py. This produces a complementary "SaaS density" metric and surfaces apps that the SPF-only view misses.

10. Email infrastructure modernity

Three additional TLS / IPv6 metrics:

  • IPv6-on-MX: MX hostname has at least one AAAA record
  • DANE / TLSA on MX: TLSA record at _25._tcp.<mx_host> (where the parquet includes TLSA queries)
  • CAA: any 0 issue … / 0 issuewild … record at apex; CAs aggregated into a market-share view (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Sectigo, …)

11. Cross-tabulations

  • Country × ESP heatmap: top-15 ccTLDs × top-15 ESPs, cell = % of country's SPF-publishing domains using ESP X. Surfaces regional ESP champions (Brevo / FR, Unisender / RU, MailerLite / LT, Akna / BR, Shoptet / CZ).
  • Mailbox × ESP combinations: stacked frequency of common stack pairings (Google Workspace + HubSpot, MS365 + Marketo, …).

12. Domain registry & identifiers

Every domain ever observed across snapshots is assigned a stable integer ID in /var/openintel-cache/registry/domains.sqlite3 (currently ~1.2 M domains). Reports reference domains by ID rather than embedding strings; clients resolve names from a single gzipped registry dump (/email-stats/domains.csv.gz, ~13 MB). This keeps per-report payloads compact, enables fast set-operation diffs across snapshots, and gives every domain a first-seen / last-seen timestamp.

13. Daily change-alerts feed

Each daily run computes a domain-level diff vs the previous scan and emits a change-feed at /email-stats/alerts.html (also as JSON + Atom). Detected events: ESP added/removed in SPF, DMARC policy upgrade/downgrade, primary-mailbox-provider change, SPF strict→soft regression, MTA-STS / BIMI first publication. Severity tag is good / bad / info.

14. Per-entity detail pages

The top-100 ESPs, top-100 SaaS senders and top-80 mailbox providers each have a dedicated detail page at /email-stats/detail/<kind>/<slug>.html showing KPI cards, a Chart.js sparkline (from history.json), TLD distribution and a sample of customer domains.

15. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k / top-10k / top-100k / top-1M / unranked.

16. Reproducibility & data hygiene

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary file hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept long-term (per OpenINTEL data agreement). The domain registry stores names but no record-level content.

17. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented. The alexa source used for pre-2022 history has a different composition (~960 k domains, US-heavier).
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see § 4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (Mimecast/Proofpoint customers using their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.
  • DKIM enumeration is selector-based — only domains whose well-known selectors are scanned by OpenINTEL appear in the DKIM layer.
  • Long-tail unmatched: ~18.5% of SPF includes belong to a long tail of regional hosters (~84 k unique singletons). This is a fundamental ceiling of any dictionary-based method — filling it would require manual research of 1500+ providers.
  • Newly-added dictionary entries have no historical sparkline until ≥ 2 daily scans accumulate, since archived raw parquet is purged after parsing per the OpenINTEL data agreement.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-05-30 — 663 036 MX, 622 559 SPF2026-05-29 — 663 271 MX, 622 553 SPF2026-05-28 — 663 075 MX, 622 229 SPF2026-05-27 — 663 040 MX, 621 877 SPF2026-05-23 — 660 587 MX, 620 034 SPF2026-05-22 — 657 556 MX, 617 016 SPF2026-05-21 — 659 930 MX, 619 421 SPF2026-05-20 — 659 568 MX, 618 994 SPF2026-05-19 — 661 300 MX, 620 621 SPF2026-05-18 — 653 826 MX, 613 816 SPF2026-05-17 — 652 834 MX, 613 060 SPF2026-05-16 — 653 289 MX, 613 507 SPF2026-05-15 — 653 883 MX, 614 025 SPF2026-05-14 — 654 606 MX, 614 742 SPF2026-05-13 — 654 450 MX, 614 641 SPF2026-05-12 — 654 613 MX, 614 806 SPF2026-05-11 — 654 275 MX, 614 529 SPF2026-05-10 — 654 198 MX, 614 496 SPF2026-05-09 — 654 965 MX, 615 249 SPF2026-05-08 — 664 721 MX, 624 279 SPF2026-05-07 — 662 493 MX, 622 130 SPF2026-05-06 — 661 868 MX, 621 451 SPF2026-05-05 — 662 628 MX, 622 150 SPF2026-05-04 — 662 839 MX, 622 414 SPF2026-05-03 — 671 505 MX, 630 301 SPF2026-05-02 — 666 074 MX, 625 213 SPF2026-05-01 — 664 902 MX, 624 104 SPF2026-04-30 — 665 325 MX, 624 448 SPF2026-04-29 — 665 578 MX, 624 625 SPF2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF2018-05-01 — 1 168 881 MX, 732 275 SPF2018-04-01 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2018-03-01 — 827 056 MX, 516 103 SPF2018-02-01 — 1 195 663 MX, 725 044 SPF2018-01-01 — 813 525 MX, 512 876 SPF2017-12-01 — 818 419 MX, 513 903 SPF2017-11-01 — 815 080 MX, 507 477 SPF2017-10-01 — 823 380 MX, 508 173 SPF2017-09-01 — 815 671 MX, 500 347 SPF2017-08-01 — 829 376 MX, 505 516 SPF2017-07-01 — 830 824 MX, 502 438 SPF2017-06-01 — 828 635 MX, 497 007 SPF2017-05-01 — 828 210 MX, 493 097 SPF2017-04-01 — 828 454 MX, 490 217 SPF2017-03-01 — 824 804 MX, 483 151 SPF2017-02-01 — 839 476 MX, 482 733 SPF2017-01-01 — 827 995 MX, 470 990 SPF2016-12-01 — 825 158 MX, 467 480 SPF2016-11-01 — 837 849 MX, 472 624 SPF2016-10-01 — 838 377 MX, 469 807 SPF2016-09-01 — 835 089 MX, 462 936 SPF2016-08-01 — 848 095 MX, 469 528 SPF2016-07-01 — 842 098 MX, 463 893 SPF2016-06-01 — 848 829 MX, 462 786 SPF2016-05-01 — 843 824 MX, 455 820 SPF2016-04-01 — 843 843 MX, 449 460 SPF2016-03-01 — 865 090 MX, 456 873 SPF2016-02-01 — 862 585 MX, 450 683 SPF2016-01-22 — 845 356 MX, 440 606 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2026-05-31. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-06-01T21:05:36Z.