Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2026-06-04.

660 158
Domains with MX
620 940
Domains with SPF
454 816
Domains with DMARC
660 158
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted →151 16622.9%
2Google Workspace →142 82121.63%
3Microsoft 365 →109 94316.65%
4Unknown / Other →51 3857.78%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) →18 2492.76%
6Proofpoint →12 7121.93%
7Generic / unmatched (mail.*) →11 3331.72%
8Yandex 360 →11 2791.71%
9Mimecast →10 3711.57%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 2511.55%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Hostinger →7 3431.11%
12Zoho Mail →6 6871.01%
13Namecheap Email Forwarding →6 6241.0%
14QQ Mail (Tencent) →5 1920.79%
15GoDaddy →4 9530.75%
16Amazon WorkMail →4 7860.72%
17OVH Mail →4 4980.68%
18Mail.ru for Business →3 8090.58%
19Barracuda →3 5450.54%
201&1 IONOS →3 3400.51%
21Cisco IronPort →3 1190.47%
22SpamExperts (SolarWinds) →2 8310.43%
23Proofpoint Essentials →2 7730.42%
24Jellyfish (Namecheap) →2 3770.36%
25Mailgun (inbound) →2 3040.35%
26Rackspace Email →2 2600.34%
27Beget (RU) →2 2030.33%
28Alibaba Mail (China) →1 9510.3%
29Zoho Mail (EU) →1 6850.26%
30Namecheap PrivateEmail →1 6000.24%
🏠 Open Providers portfolio → cards with country, blurb, sparkline & TLD breakdown — click any provider name above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
12.42%
81 972 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
36 699
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
22.93%
151 347 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Amazon SES →38 2576.16%
2SendGrid (Twilio) →29 5984.77%
3Mailgun →25 3094.08%
4Zendesk →24 0533.87%
5Mailchimp →22 9203.69%
6Mandrill →21 0023.38%
7HubSpot →19 6823.17%
8Salesforce →16 3502.63%
9Mailjet (Sinch) →13 1312.11%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 8481.75%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast →9 0331.45%
12Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) →8 6671.4%
13MailerSend →7 7741.25%
14Namecheap Forwarding →6 8881.11%
15MailChannels →6 6521.07%
16Elastic Email →4 4100.71%
17Unisender (RU) →3 7180.6%
18Constant Contact →3 5560.57%
19Campaign Monitor →3 4230.55%
20Marketo (Adobe) →3 3040.53%
21Zoho Campaigns →3 1630.51%
22Emsd1 (transactional) →3 0330.49%
23Postmark →2 9240.47%
24SendPulse →2 9150.47%
25SparkPost →2 6490.43%
26Zoho ZeptoMail →2 6340.42%
27Exclaimer (signatures) →2 6320.42%
28Help Scout →2 3310.38%
29Salesforce Marketing Cloud →2 2390.36%
30Barracuda Essentials →2 1920.35%
📮 Open Mailing services portfolio → all detected ESPs with descriptions, country, sparklines — click any ESP above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Shopify →5 0340.81%
2Pardot (Salesforce) →4 9860.8%
3CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 →4 3660.7%
4KnowBe4 →3 5080.56%
5Statuspage (Atlassian) →2 1440.35%
6Trustpilot →1 9230.31%
7Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) →1 8630.3%
8Firebase (Google) →1 7510.28%
9Lark / Feishu →1 2870.21%
10BigCommerce →1 1820.19%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle) →1 1340.18%
12Sage Intacct →1 1120.18%
13Qualtrics →1 0980.18%
14Oracle Cloud Email →1 0560.17%
15Docebo (LMS) →9210.15%
16WordPress.com / WP Cloud →8840.14%
17Oracle Cloud →8270.13%
18One.com (DK hosting) →7900.13%
19Zoho Books →7120.11%
20AFAS →6340.1%
21Greenhouse →6320.1%
22SAP SuccessFactors →6010.1%
23PayPal Braintree →5840.09%
24ClickDimensions →5830.09%
25UKG / UltiPro →5520.09%
26Autotask (ConnectWise) →5170.08%
27RetailCRM →5030.08%
28ConnectWise →4760.08%
29TOPdesk →4570.07%
30Freshservice (Freshworks) →4410.07%
📧 Open SaaS/ESP senders portfolio → SaaS apps sending FROM customer domains — click any SaaS name above for detail

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.01%30d ago▲ +0.36%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;55 201
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 659
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 316
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 872
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 877
6v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 726
7v=DMARC1;p=none;3 706
8v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 179
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 144
10v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;3 113
11v=DMARC1; p=reject2 846
12v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 710
13v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 368
14v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;2 048
15v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 032
16v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 882
17v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 781
18v=DMARC1;p=none1 726
19v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:desjardins@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:desjardins@ruf.agari.com;1 606
20v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 427
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 400
22v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 321
23v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 283
24v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 279
25v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 248
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 228
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 073
28v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 028
29v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;1 006
30v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;987
31v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com943
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s884
33v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com873
34v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email759
35v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com745
36v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100691
37v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100691
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com668
39v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400663
40v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com609
41v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com609
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;562
43v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400534
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;507
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com502
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;500
47v=DMARC1;p=quarantine497
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;449
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;447
50v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s441
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;428
52v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1402
53v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r369
54v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r363
55v=DMARC1346
56v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com340
57v=DMARC1;p=reject339
58v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;337
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;336
60v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400326
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;318
62v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1310
63v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100307
64v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;304
65v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;303
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s293
67v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400274
68v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com270
69v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r269
70v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1263
71v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100256
72v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;248
73v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
74v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp229
75v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;226
76v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;222
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com214
78v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com213
79v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r206
80v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app203
81v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email202
82v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;202
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com201
84v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject200
85v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;188
86v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl188
87v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100184
88v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com180
89v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com180
90v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r179
91v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;176
92v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;174
93v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;173
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1172
95v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;171
96v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r;167
97v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s162
98v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100161
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400158
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400156

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1nan4 801
2newman-nyc-do.mirus.io424
3newman-dfw-lin.mirus.io424
4localhost408
5mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net307
6asapsemi1.mail.protection.office365.us273
7mx.services269
8mail246
9mx01.1and1.com205
10mx00.1and1.com201
11mail1.sbnation.com166
12zonemx.eu161
13mail.autoline.com.ua161
14mx2.z-ns.net160
15mx.email-messaging.com145
16~143
17alltheemails.com142
18s.mail.dcsaas.net119
19uk.mx1.mailanyone.net118
20uk.mx2.mx25.net118
21lbmx.bcc.gov.bd117
22mxi.alpha-prm.jp115
23uk.mx3.mailanyone.net115
24relay1.netnames.net113
25relay2.netnames.net113
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx.simply.com111
27se.mx1.mailanyone.net111
28se.mx2.mx25.net111
29uk.mx4.mx25.net111
30mx240.umbler.co.uk108
31mx364.umbler.com107
32se.mx3.mailanyone.net106
33mx00.1and1.co.uk105
34se.mx4.mx25.net105
35mx10.websupport.sk105
36mx20.websupport.sk105
37mx1d10.thinline.cz105
38mx1b20.thinline.cz105
39mx01.1and1.co.uk103
40mwpremgw1.ocn.ad.jp102
41mwpremgw2.ocn.ad.jp102
42mx1.cleanmx.pt101
43mx.nothing-sus.com100
44cloudmail.auto-vision.ru99
45mx2.cleanmx.pt99
46mx01.mailplug.com97
47mx01.lancloud.ru97
48mx02.lancloud.ru97
49mx04.lancloud.ru97
50mx02.mailplug.com96
51mx1.ticketsinbound.com96
52mailin.mx-hub.cz95
53mailin.mx-hub.sk95
54mx03.lancloud.ru95
55mx.zoho.com.au94
56mx2.zoho.com.au94
57mx2.ticketsinbound.com93
58mx3.zoho.com.au93
59mailin.mx-hub.eu90
60amazon-smtp.amazon.com85
61mailforward.dnsv.jp84
62mx-backup.serveriai.lt84
63mx1-dk.centerasecurity.dk83
64mx2-dk.centerasecurity.dk83
65smtp-fwd.wordpress.com82
66mx1.atmosphere.facct.ru81
67mx2.atmosphere.facct.ru81
68mx.zoho.com.cn81
69mx.hetemail.jp80
70mx.maxns.net80
71mx.aams4.jp80
72mx2.zoho.com.cn80
73mx3.name.com79
74antispam1.ihs.com.tr79
75antispam2.ihs.com.tr79
76mx1.email-cluster.com79
77mx2.email-cluster.com79
78mx4.name.com78
79mx-01.mail-forwarder.io78
80mx6.name.com77
81mx5.name.com77
82mx8.name.com77
83mx-0.aams4.jp77
84mx-1.aams4.jp77
85mx3-dk.centerasecurity.dk77
86mx7.name.com76
87sitemail.everyone.net76
88mail.global.frontbridge.com76
89mx-02.mail-forwarder.io76
90failover1.email-cluster.com76
91mxint01.1and1.com75
92mxint02.1and1.com75
93mx-proxy501.heteml.jp75
94mx1.netim.net73
95mx2.netim.net73
96mx01.1and1.fr73
97mx-proxy502.heteml.jp73
98mx00.1and1.fr72
99mail.parktons.com72
100smtp-avas.seeweb.it71

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1spf.pitcom.net112
2_spf.edhost.eu110
3qcloudmail.com109
4spf.kirim.email109
5yunyou.top108
6_spf.maileroo.com108
7spf.boldem.cz108
8_spf.armada.it108
9_spf.mail-neoserv.si107
10gateways.firstdata.com106
11spf.ssmx.net105
12_spf.octadesk.com105
13outbound.smtp.wisestamp.net104
14_spf.exsilia.net103
15spf.aams4.jp102
16spf.betrend.com102
17spf.263.net101
18_pmta2.antevenio.com101
19spf-2248456.jmsend.com100
20_spf.wpopt.net100
21spf-00181c02.pphosted.com99
22mlrcloud.com99
23send.k-crm.jp99
24spf.splio.com98
25spf.v6send.net98
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.cesky-hosting.cz97
27spf.satorimail.net97
28relay.thundermail.uk96
29spf.spcloud.jp96
30spf.w4ymail.at95
31spf.mailcamp.nl95
32_spf.localservices.com.br95
33_spf.academicworks.com95
34ofsys.com94
35_spf01.mykronos.com94
36spf.squalomail.com94
37spfref.jackhenry.com94
38amazon.com94
39_spf.presscloud.com93
40_spf.ogicom.pl93
41usermail.zohocreator.com93
42fmx.etius.jp93
43_spf.tld-mx.com92
44mailing.eqs.com92
45spf.shared.spaceship.host92
46spf.greengeeks.net92
47spf.shopserve.jp92
48_spf.sent2email.com91
49no-ip.com91
50_spf.simpleviewinc.com91
51spf.qb-feedback.com90
52spf.emailfilter.io90
53_spf-dc10.sapsf.com90
54spf90
55spf.redpoints.com90
56_spf.aid.no90
57mailmailmail.net89
58spf-002fa101.pphosted.com89
59relay.email-cluster.com89
60_spf.webglobe.cz89
61ciphr247.com89
62spf.symplicity.com89
63spf.cyberimpact.com88
64eversrv.com88
65_spf.sendnode.com88
66smtp-cluster.plusvps.com88
67spf.w2solution.com88
68verifymyfafsa.com88
69sendgrid.com87
70spf.oximailing.com87
71_spf.we.wedos.net87
72spf.sendios.io87
73senders.mailmasterplus.net86
74_spf.abcp.ru86
75spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl86
76mfg.siteprotect.com84
77relay.guzelhosting.com84
78spf.protection.outlook84
79spf-00596a01.pphosted.com84
80spf.remarkety.com84
81mail.feedblitz.com83
82spf.host-ww.net83
83spf.icontroller.eu83
84universalspf.org83
85spf.sosafe.de83
86_spf.goskope.com82
87_spf.shared-server.net82
88x.universalspf.org82
89_spf.paytsoftware.com82
90euromsg.net82
91spf-0024c501.pphosted.com82
92_spf.lh.pl81
93_spf.eemsg.mail.mil81
94mail.zohoanalytics.com81
95custmail.vdata.com81
96spf.esvacloud.com81
97spf.pantheon.io79
98spf2.nlk2.smtps.jp79
99spf.qboxmail.com79
100spf-bulk.axa.com78

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet. For pre-2022 history we additionally use OpenINTEL's alexa source (the legacy Alexa top-1M list, retired 2023).

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample & cadence

Each report covers a single date — the latest OpenINTEL snapshot with <24h delay, typically ~700 k domains with MX records and ~620 k with SPF. The pipeline runs daily at 23:00 Europe/Moscow; each daily run produces an HTML report, a JSON summary, an updated time-series, and incremental updates to the domain registry (§ 12). No sub-sampling.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py, currently ~310 patterns). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP / SaaS / forwarder / gateway classification (SPF-based)

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against open classification dictionaries (ESPs, mailbox-as-sender, anti-spam gateways, forwarders, SaaS senders, DMARC vendors, NS providers, verification tokens).

Resolution order: PURE_ESP → MAILBOX_AS_SENDER → GATEWAYS → FORWARDERS → bare-apex substring fallback → SAAS_SENDERS substring iteration. Bare-apex derivation strips leading _spf., _spf-eu., spf., mail. prefixes from dict keys to catch subdomain variants (e.g. _spf.m1.websupport.sk → matches websupport.sk). Malformed includes (no dot, <4 chars) are filtered.

One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously, so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains. Current SPF-include classification coverage: ~81.5% (up from ~38.5% baseline).

Limitation: "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IP ranges to fit the 10-lookup limit) is not detectable from DNS alone — those domains appear ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used.

5. DMARC (deep)

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for:

  • p= (apex policy): none / quarantine / reject / invalid
  • sp= (subdomain policy)
  • pct= (rollout percentage)
  • rua= aggregate-report destinations → classified into vendor buckets (Postmark DMARC, Valimail, dmarcian, URIports, EasyDMARC, Red Sift, Proofpoint EFD, Agari/Fortra, …) using dictionaries/dmarc_vendors.py

A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent — defaults to 100).

6. SPF mechanics & health

For every SPF record we additionally extract:

  • Final qualifier on the all mechanism: -all (hard fail), ~all (soft fail), ?all (neutral), +all (pass-everything — broken / dangerous), or missing
  • DNS lookup count (include:, redirect=, a:, mx:, exists:, ptr:) — each mechanism counts as 1 against the spec limit of 10. Records exceeding the limit return PermErr at recipients
  • Mechanism mix: include-only (modern), raw IP4/IP6 ranges only (legacy/flattened), mixed
  • Record byte length: percentiles to flag fragmentation risk (>450 B)

7. Email security maturity

Adoption of modern mail-security TXT records, parsed from the same OpenINTEL parquet:

  • MTA-STS: TXT at _mta-sts.<domain> with v=STSv1 — domain advertises required-TLS to its MX
  • BIMI: TXT at default._bimi.<domain> with v=BIMI1 — brand publishes a verified logo (requires p=reject)
  • TLS-RPT (SMTP TLS Reporting): TXT at _smtp._tls.<domain> with v=TLSRPTv1 — domain monitors TLS-failure reports
  • DKIM selectors: where the OpenINTEL scan includes *._domainkey.<domain> queries, well-known selectors (google, selector1/2, s1/s2, k1/k2/k3, mailo, mte1, …) are mapped to issuing ESPs

8. DNS provider classification

For each domain's NS RRset, every NS hostname is matched against a suffix dictionary (dictionaries/ns_providers.py) with patterns for Cloudflare, AWS Route 53, Azure DNS, Google Cloud DNS, GoDaddy, Akamai, NS1, UltraDNS, Yandex, DNSPod, Aliyun, OVH, Hetzner, Gandi, registrars, and others. A domain is assigned to its dominant NS provider; ties resolve to whichever pattern was matched first.

9. SaaS-via-verification-tokens

Many SaaS apps a domain is connected to never appear in SPF (because the SaaS doesn't send mail FROM the customer domain). To recover this signal we parse apex TXT records for verification tokens — google-site-verification=…, MS=…, atlassian-domain-verification=…, stripe-verification=…, plus ~70 other patterns in dictionaries/verification_tokens.py. This produces a complementary "SaaS density" metric and surfaces apps that the SPF-only view misses.

10. Email infrastructure modernity

Three additional TLS / IPv6 metrics:

  • IPv6-on-MX: MX hostname has at least one AAAA record
  • DANE / TLSA on MX: TLSA record at _25._tcp.<mx_host> (where the parquet includes TLSA queries)
  • CAA: any 0 issue … / 0 issuewild … record at apex; CAs aggregated into a market-share view (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Sectigo, …)

11. Cross-tabulations

  • Country × ESP heatmap: top-15 ccTLDs × top-15 ESPs, cell = % of country's SPF-publishing domains using ESP X. Surfaces regional ESP champions (Brevo / FR, Unisender / RU, MailerLite / LT, Akna / BR, Shoptet / CZ).
  • Mailbox × ESP combinations: stacked frequency of common stack pairings (Google Workspace + HubSpot, MS365 + Marketo, …).

12. Domain registry & identifiers

Every domain ever observed across snapshots is assigned a stable integer ID in /var/openintel-cache/registry/domains.sqlite3 (currently ~1.2 M domains). Reports reference domains by ID rather than embedding strings; clients resolve names from a single gzipped registry dump (/email-stats/domains.csv.gz, ~13 MB). This keeps per-report payloads compact, enables fast set-operation diffs across snapshots, and gives every domain a first-seen / last-seen timestamp.

13. Daily change-alerts feed

Each daily run computes a domain-level diff vs the previous scan and emits a change-feed at /email-stats/alerts.html (also as JSON + Atom). Detected events: ESP added/removed in SPF, DMARC policy upgrade/downgrade, primary-mailbox-provider change, SPF strict→soft regression, MTA-STS / BIMI first publication. Severity tag is good / bad / info.

14. Per-entity detail pages

The top-100 ESPs, top-100 SaaS senders and top-80 mailbox providers each have a dedicated detail page at /email-stats/detail/<kind>/<slug>.html showing KPI cards, a Chart.js sparkline (from history.json), TLD distribution and a sample of customer domains.

15. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k / top-10k / top-100k / top-1M / unranked.

16. Reproducibility & data hygiene

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary file hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept long-term (per OpenINTEL data agreement). The domain registry stores names but no record-level content.

17. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented. The alexa source used for pre-2022 history has a different composition (~960 k domains, US-heavier).
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see § 4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (Mimecast/Proofpoint customers using their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.
  • DKIM enumeration is selector-based — only domains whose well-known selectors are scanned by OpenINTEL appear in the DKIM layer.
  • Long-tail unmatched: ~18.5% of SPF includes belong to a long tail of regional hosters (~84 k unique singletons). This is a fundamental ceiling of any dictionary-based method — filling it would require manual research of 1500+ providers.
  • Newly-added dictionary entries have no historical sparkline until ≥ 2 daily scans accumulate, since archived raw parquet is purged after parsing per the OpenINTEL data agreement.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-06-03 — 660 101 MX, 620 354 SPF2026-06-02 — 660 335 MX, 620 446 SPF2026-06-01 — 662 428 MX, 622 222 SPF2026-05-31 — 667 641 MX, 626 984 SPF2026-05-30 — 663 036 MX, 622 559 SPF2026-05-29 — 663 271 MX, 622 553 SPF2026-05-28 — 663 075 MX, 622 229 SPF2026-05-27 — 663 040 MX, 621 877 SPF2026-05-23 — 660 587 MX, 620 034 SPF2026-05-22 — 657 556 MX, 617 016 SPF2026-05-21 — 659 930 MX, 619 421 SPF2026-05-20 — 659 568 MX, 618 994 SPF2026-05-19 — 661 300 MX, 620 621 SPF2026-05-18 — 653 826 MX, 613 816 SPF2026-05-17 — 652 834 MX, 613 060 SPF2026-05-16 — 653 289 MX, 613 507 SPF2026-05-15 — 653 883 MX, 614 025 SPF2026-05-14 — 654 606 MX, 614 742 SPF2026-05-13 — 654 450 MX, 614 641 SPF2026-05-12 — 654 613 MX, 614 806 SPF2026-05-11 — 654 275 MX, 614 529 SPF2026-05-10 — 654 198 MX, 614 496 SPF2026-05-09 — 654 965 MX, 615 249 SPF2026-05-08 — 664 721 MX, 624 279 SPF2026-05-07 — 662 493 MX, 622 130 SPF2026-05-06 — 661 868 MX, 621 451 SPF2026-05-05 — 662 628 MX, 622 150 SPF2026-05-04 — 662 839 MX, 622 414 SPF2026-05-03 — 671 505 MX, 630 301 SPF2026-05-02 — 666 074 MX, 625 213 SPF2026-05-01 — 664 902 MX, 624 104 SPF2026-04-30 — 665 325 MX, 624 448 SPF2026-04-29 — 665 578 MX, 624 625 SPF2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF2018-05-01 — 1 168 881 MX, 732 275 SPF2018-04-01 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2018-03-01 — 827 056 MX, 516 103 SPF2018-02-01 — 1 195 663 MX, 725 044 SPF2018-01-01 — 813 525 MX, 512 876 SPF2017-12-01 — 818 419 MX, 513 903 SPF2017-11-01 — 815 080 MX, 507 477 SPF2017-10-01 — 823 380 MX, 508 173 SPF2017-09-01 — 815 671 MX, 500 347 SPF2017-08-01 — 829 376 MX, 505 516 SPF2017-07-01 — 830 824 MX, 502 438 SPF2017-06-01 — 828 635 MX, 497 007 SPF2017-05-01 — 828 210 MX, 493 097 SPF2017-04-01 — 828 454 MX, 490 217 SPF2017-03-01 — 824 804 MX, 483 151 SPF2017-02-01 — 839 476 MX, 482 733 SPF2017-01-01 — 827 995 MX, 470 990 SPF2016-12-01 — 825 158 MX, 467 480 SPF2016-11-01 — 837 849 MX, 472 624 SPF2016-10-01 — 838 377 MX, 469 807 SPF2016-09-01 — 835 089 MX, 462 936 SPF2016-08-01 — 848 095 MX, 469 528 SPF2016-07-01 — 842 098 MX, 463 893 SPF2016-06-01 — 848 829 MX, 462 786 SPF2016-05-01 — 843 824 MX, 455 820 SPF2016-04-01 — 843 843 MX, 449 460 SPF2016-03-01 — 865 090 MX, 456 873 SPF2016-02-01 — 862 585 MX, 450 683 SPF2016-01-22 — 845 356 MX, 440 606 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2026-06-04. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-06-05T21:05:42Z.