Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2026-06-06.

658 426
Domains with MX
619 451
Domains with SPF
453 928
Domains with DMARC
658 426
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted →151 08422.95%
2Google Workspace →142 27621.61%
3Microsoft 365 →109 23716.59%
4Unknown / Other →51 0947.76%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) →18 1532.76%
6Proofpoint →12 6311.92%
7Generic / unmatched (mail.*) →11 2891.71%
8Yandex 360 →11 1701.7%
9Mimecast →10 3061.57%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 2451.56%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Hostinger →7 6191.16%
12Namecheap Email Forwarding →6 9661.06%
13Zoho Mail →6 6611.01%
14QQ Mail (Tencent) →5 1530.78%
15GoDaddy →4 9520.75%
16Amazon WorkMail →4 7830.73%
17OVH Mail →4 4660.68%
18Mail.ru for Business →3 7620.57%
19Barracuda →3 4820.53%
201&1 IONOS →3 3160.5%
21Cisco IronPort →3 1260.47%
22SpamExperts (SolarWinds) →2 8250.43%
23Proofpoint Essentials →2 7410.42%
24Jellyfish (Namecheap) →2 5690.39%
25Mailgun (inbound) →2 3140.35%
26Rackspace Email →2 2410.34%
27Beget (RU) →2 1910.33%
28Alibaba Mail (China) →1 9410.29%
29Zoho Mail (EU) →1 6970.26%
30Namecheap PrivateEmail →1 6120.24%
🏠 Open Providers portfolio → cards with country, blurb, sparkline & TLD breakdown — click any provider name above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
12.38%
81 531 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
36 522
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
22.97%
151 263 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Amazon SES →38 1236.15%
2SendGrid (Twilio) →29 4254.75%
3Mailgun →25 1654.06%
4Zendesk →23 9503.87%
5Mailchimp →22 7463.67%
6Mandrill →20 8623.37%
7HubSpot →19 5743.16%
8Salesforce →16 2782.63%
9Mailjet (Sinch) →13 0442.11%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 8471.75%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast →8 9701.45%
12Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) →8 6391.39%
13MailerSend →7 7561.25%
14Namecheap Forwarding →7 2281.17%
15MailChannels →6 6721.08%
16Elastic Email →4 4030.71%
17Unisender (RU) →3 6860.6%
18Constant Contact →3 5190.57%
19Campaign Monitor →3 4070.55%
20Marketo (Adobe) →3 2900.53%
21Zoho Campaigns →3 1330.51%
22Emsd1 (transactional) →3 0130.49%
23SendPulse →2 9070.47%
24Postmark →2 9030.47%
25SparkPost →2 6320.42%
26Zoho ZeptoMail →2 6180.42%
27Exclaimer (signatures) →2 6080.42%
28Help Scout →2 3200.37%
29Salesforce Marketing Cloud →2 2220.36%
30Barracuda Essentials →2 1560.35%
📮 Open Mailing services portfolio → all detected ESPs with descriptions, country, sparklines — click any ESP above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Shopify →4 9810.8%
2Pardot (Salesforce) →4 9510.8%
3CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 →4 3300.7%
4KnowBe4 →3 4790.56%
5Statuspage (Atlassian) →2 1370.34%
6Trustpilot →1 9120.31%
7Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) →1 8510.3%
8Firebase (Google) →1 7530.28%
9Lark / Feishu →1 2780.21%
10BigCommerce →1 1680.19%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle) →1 1290.18%
12Sage Intacct →1 1100.18%
13Qualtrics →1 0930.18%
14Oracle Cloud Email →1 0590.17%
15Docebo (LMS) →9160.15%
16WordPress.com / WP Cloud →8840.14%
17Oracle Cloud →8220.13%
18One.com (DK hosting) →7870.13%
19Zoho Books →7020.11%
20AFAS →6280.1%
21Greenhouse →6270.1%
22SAP SuccessFactors →5930.1%
23PayPal Braintree →5780.09%
24ClickDimensions →5770.09%
25UKG / UltiPro →5460.09%
26Autotask (ConnectWise) →5140.08%
27RetailCRM →5100.08%
28ConnectWise →4690.08%
29TOPdesk →4570.07%
30Freshservice (Freshworks) →4400.07%
📧 Open SaaS/ESP senders portfolio → SaaS apps sending FROM customer domains — click any SaaS name above for detail

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.02%30d ago▲ +0.41%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;55 515
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 758
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 318
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 843
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 854
6v=DMARC1;p=none;3 681
7v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 676
8v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;3 394
9v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 171
10v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 153
11v=DMARC1; p=reject2 811
12v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 711
13v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 348
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 019
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;1 942
16v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 908
17v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 772
18v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:desjardins@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:desjardins@ruf.agari.com;1 726
19v=DMARC1;p=none1 703
20v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 414
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 391
22v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 318
23v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 269
24v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 244
25v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 243
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 221
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 071
28v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 022
29v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;995
30v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;975
31v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com931
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s875
33v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com872
34v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email756
35v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com736
36v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100686
37v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100686
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com662
39v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400659
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com610
41v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com608
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;572
43v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400534
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;504
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com504
46v=DMARC1;p=quarantine496
47v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;494
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;448
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;445
50v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s432
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;427
52v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r370
53v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1369
54v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r360
55v=DMARC1342
56v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;340
57v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com337
58v=DMARC1;p=reject336
59v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;336
60v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400329
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;320
62v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1309
63v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;309
64v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;305
65v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100303
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s293
67v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r273
68v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
69v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400271
70v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1262
71v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100254
72v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com248
73v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;246
74v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;227
75v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp226
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;225
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com214
78v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com214
79v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r205
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com203
81v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app203
82v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email202
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;201
84v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject198
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl188
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;187
87v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100186
88v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com180
89v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;179
90v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r178
91v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;177
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com177
93v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;175
94v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;171
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1170
96v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r;162
97v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s161
98v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100160
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400156
100v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject;155

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1nan4 668
2newman-nyc-do.mirus.io451
3newman-dfw-lin.mirus.io451
4localhost409
5mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net300
6mx.services279
7asapsemi1.mail.protection.office365.us268
8mail241
9mx01.1and1.com206
10mx00.1and1.com202
11mail1.sbnation.com166
12zonemx.eu159
13mail.autoline.com.ua156
14mx2.z-ns.net155
15mx.email-messaging.com144
16~140
17alltheemails.com135
18s.mail.dcsaas.net119
19lbmx.bcc.gov.bd118
20uk.mx1.mailanyone.net116
21uk.mx2.mx25.net116
22mxi.alpha-prm.jp113
23uk.mx3.mailanyone.net113
24mx.simply.com112
25se.mx1.mailanyone.net112
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26se.mx2.mx25.net112
27relay1.netnames.net111
28relay2.netnames.net111
29uk.mx4.mx25.net109
30mx00.1and1.co.uk107
31se.mx3.mailanyone.net107
32se.mx4.mx25.net106
33mx01.1and1.co.uk105
34mx1d10.thinline.cz105
35mx1b20.thinline.cz105
36mx240.umbler.co.uk105
37mx364.umbler.com104
38mx10.websupport.sk103
39mx20.websupport.sk103
40mwpremgw1.ocn.ad.jp101
41mwpremgw2.ocn.ad.jp101
42mx.nothing-sus.com100
43mx1.cleanmx.pt100
44cloudmail.auto-vision.ru99
45mx2.cleanmx.pt98
46mx01.lancloud.ru97
47mx02.lancloud.ru97
48mx04.lancloud.ru97
49void.blackhole.mx96
50mailin.mx-hub.cz95
51mailin.mx-hub.sk95
52mx03.lancloud.ru95
53mx.zoho.com.au93
54mx2.zoho.com.au93
55mx01.mailplug.com92
56mx3.zoho.com.au92
57mx02.mailplug.com91
58mx1.ticketsinbound.com90
59mailin.mx-hub.eu89
60mx2.ticketsinbound.com87
61mx-backup.serveriai.lt87
62amazon-smtp.amazon.com85
63mailforward.dnsv.jp84
64mx1-dk.centerasecurity.dk82
65mx2-dk.centerasecurity.dk82
66mx1.atmosphere.facct.ru82
67mx2.atmosphere.facct.ru82
68mx.hetemail.jp81
69antispam1.ihs.com.tr81
70antispam2.ihs.com.tr81
71mx3.name.com80
72mx.maxns.net80
73mx.aams4.jp80
74smtp-fwd.wordpress.com80
75mx.zoho.com.cn80
76mx4.name.com79
77mx2.zoho.com.cn79
78mx6.name.com78
79mx5.name.com78
80mx8.name.com78
81mx7.name.com77
82mx-0.aams4.jp77
83mx-1.aams4.jp77
84mx-01.mail-forwarder.io77
85mx1.email-cluster.com77
86mx2.email-cluster.com77
87mx3-dk.centerasecurity.dk76
88mxint01.1and1.com75
89mxint02.1and1.com75
90mx-proxy501.heteml.jp75
91mx-02.mail-forwarder.io75
92mail.global.frontbridge.com74
93failover1.email-cluster.com74
94mx01.1and1.fr73
95mx-proxy502.heteml.jp73
96sitemail.everyone.net73
97mx00.1and1.fr72
98smtp-avas.seeweb.it71
99mx.vshosting.eu71
100mail.parktons.com70

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1spf.pitcom.net112
2qcloudmail.com111
3_spf.edhost.eu110
4_spf.mail-neoserv.si110
5_spf.maileroo.com108
6yunyou.top108
7spf.boldem.cz108
8spf.kirim.email107
9_spf.armada.it107
10gateways.firstdata.com105
11spf.ssmx.net105
12_spf.octadesk.com105
13outbound.smtp.wisestamp.net104
14_spf.exsilia.net102
15spf.aams4.jp102
16_pmta2.antevenio.com101
17mlrcloud.com101
18spf.betrend.com101
19send.k-crm.jp100
20spf-2248456.jmsend.com100
21_spf.wpopt.net100
22spf.263.net98
23spf-00181c02.pphosted.com97
24spf.w4ymail.at97
25spf.cesky-hosting.cz97
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.splio.com97
27spf.v6send.net97
28spf.satorimail.net97
29amazon.com96
30spf.shared.spaceship.host96
31_spf.localservices.com.br96
32spf.mailcamp.nl95
33relay.thundermail.uk95
34spf.spcloud.jp95
35_spf01.mykronos.com94
36ofsys.com94
37_spf.tld-mx.com94
38spf.squalomail.com94
39fmx.etius.jp93
40mailing.eqs.com93
41spfref.jackhenry.com93
42_spf.academicworks.com93
43_spf.presscloud.com93
44_spf.ogicom.pl93
45usermail.zohocreator.com92
46spf.greengeeks.net92
47spf.shopserve.jp92
48spf.qb-feedback.com91
49spf.host-ww.net91
50_spf.simpleviewinc.com91
51_spf.sent2email.com91
52spf.emailfilter.io91
53spf90
54spf.symplicity.com89
55spf-002fa101.pphosted.com89
56_spf-dc10.sapsf.com89
57spf.redpoints.com89
58_spf.webglobe.cz89
59smtp-cluster.plusvps.com89
60_spf.aid.no89
61spf.cyberimpact.com88
62eversrv.com88
63relay.guzelhosting.com88
64mailmailmail.net88
65ciphr247.com88
66_spf.abcp.ru88
67verifymyfafsa.com88
68_spf.sendnode.com87
69relay.email-cluster.com87
70spf.w2solution.com87
71spf.sendios.io87
72sendgrid.com85
73no-ip.com85
74_spf.we.wedos.net85
75senders.mailmasterplus.net85
76spf.oximailing.com85
77euromsg.net84
78_spf.eemsg.mail.mil84
79mfg.siteprotect.com83
80spf.remarkety.com83
81spf.sosafe.de83
82spf-0024c501.pphosted.com83
83spf-00596a01.pphosted.com83
84spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl83
85_spf.shared-server.net83
86spf.icontroller.eu82
87_spf.lh.pl82
88universalspf.org82
89x.universalspf.org82
90spf.protection.outlook82
91mail.feedblitz.com82
92spf.esvacloud.com80
93_spf.paytsoftware.com80
94_spf.goskope.com80
95custmail.vdata.com80
96mail.zohoanalytics.com79
97spf.pantheon.io79
98spf2.nlk2.smtps.jp79
99spf.qboxmail.com78
100salsalabs.net78

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet. For pre-2022 history we additionally use OpenINTEL's alexa source (the legacy Alexa top-1M list, retired 2023).

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample & cadence

Each report covers a single date — the latest OpenINTEL snapshot with <24h delay, typically ~700 k domains with MX records and ~620 k with SPF. The pipeline runs daily at 23:00 Europe/Moscow; each daily run produces an HTML report, a JSON summary, an updated time-series, and incremental updates to the domain registry (§ 12). No sub-sampling.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py, currently ~310 patterns). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP / SaaS / forwarder / gateway classification (SPF-based)

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against open classification dictionaries (ESPs, mailbox-as-sender, anti-spam gateways, forwarders, SaaS senders, DMARC vendors, NS providers, verification tokens).

Resolution order: PURE_ESP → MAILBOX_AS_SENDER → GATEWAYS → FORWARDERS → bare-apex substring fallback → SAAS_SENDERS substring iteration. Bare-apex derivation strips leading _spf., _spf-eu., spf., mail. prefixes from dict keys to catch subdomain variants (e.g. _spf.m1.websupport.sk → matches websupport.sk). Malformed includes (no dot, <4 chars) are filtered.

One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously, so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains. Current SPF-include classification coverage: ~81.5% (up from ~38.5% baseline).

Limitation: "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IP ranges to fit the 10-lookup limit) is not detectable from DNS alone — those domains appear ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used.

5. DMARC (deep)

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for:

  • p= (apex policy): none / quarantine / reject / invalid
  • sp= (subdomain policy)
  • pct= (rollout percentage)
  • rua= aggregate-report destinations → classified into vendor buckets (Postmark DMARC, Valimail, dmarcian, URIports, EasyDMARC, Red Sift, Proofpoint EFD, Agari/Fortra, …) using dictionaries/dmarc_vendors.py

A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent — defaults to 100).

6. SPF mechanics & health

For every SPF record we additionally extract:

  • Final qualifier on the all mechanism: -all (hard fail), ~all (soft fail), ?all (neutral), +all (pass-everything — broken / dangerous), or missing
  • DNS lookup count (include:, redirect=, a:, mx:, exists:, ptr:) — each mechanism counts as 1 against the spec limit of 10. Records exceeding the limit return PermErr at recipients
  • Mechanism mix: include-only (modern), raw IP4/IP6 ranges only (legacy/flattened), mixed
  • Record byte length: percentiles to flag fragmentation risk (>450 B)

7. Email security maturity

Adoption of modern mail-security TXT records, parsed from the same OpenINTEL parquet:

  • MTA-STS: TXT at _mta-sts.<domain> with v=STSv1 — domain advertises required-TLS to its MX
  • BIMI: TXT at default._bimi.<domain> with v=BIMI1 — brand publishes a verified logo (requires p=reject)
  • TLS-RPT (SMTP TLS Reporting): TXT at _smtp._tls.<domain> with v=TLSRPTv1 — domain monitors TLS-failure reports
  • DKIM selectors: where the OpenINTEL scan includes *._domainkey.<domain> queries, well-known selectors (google, selector1/2, s1/s2, k1/k2/k3, mailo, mte1, …) are mapped to issuing ESPs

8. DNS provider classification

For each domain's NS RRset, every NS hostname is matched against a suffix dictionary (dictionaries/ns_providers.py) with patterns for Cloudflare, AWS Route 53, Azure DNS, Google Cloud DNS, GoDaddy, Akamai, NS1, UltraDNS, Yandex, DNSPod, Aliyun, OVH, Hetzner, Gandi, registrars, and others. A domain is assigned to its dominant NS provider; ties resolve to whichever pattern was matched first.

9. SaaS-via-verification-tokens

Many SaaS apps a domain is connected to never appear in SPF (because the SaaS doesn't send mail FROM the customer domain). To recover this signal we parse apex TXT records for verification tokens — google-site-verification=…, MS=…, atlassian-domain-verification=…, stripe-verification=…, plus ~70 other patterns in dictionaries/verification_tokens.py. This produces a complementary "SaaS density" metric and surfaces apps that the SPF-only view misses.

10. Email infrastructure modernity

Three additional TLS / IPv6 metrics:

  • IPv6-on-MX: MX hostname has at least one AAAA record
  • DANE / TLSA on MX: TLSA record at _25._tcp.<mx_host> (where the parquet includes TLSA queries)
  • CAA: any 0 issue … / 0 issuewild … record at apex; CAs aggregated into a market-share view (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Sectigo, …)

11. Cross-tabulations

  • Country × ESP heatmap: top-15 ccTLDs × top-15 ESPs, cell = % of country's SPF-publishing domains using ESP X. Surfaces regional ESP champions (Brevo / FR, Unisender / RU, MailerLite / LT, Akna / BR, Shoptet / CZ).
  • Mailbox × ESP combinations: stacked frequency of common stack pairings (Google Workspace + HubSpot, MS365 + Marketo, …).

12. Domain registry & identifiers

Every domain ever observed across snapshots is assigned a stable integer ID in /var/openintel-cache/registry/domains.sqlite3 (currently ~1.2 M domains). Reports reference domains by ID rather than embedding strings; clients resolve names from a single gzipped registry dump (/email-stats/domains.csv.gz, ~13 MB). This keeps per-report payloads compact, enables fast set-operation diffs across snapshots, and gives every domain a first-seen / last-seen timestamp.

13. Daily change-alerts feed

Each daily run computes a domain-level diff vs the previous scan and emits a change-feed at /email-stats/alerts.html (also as JSON + Atom). Detected events: ESP added/removed in SPF, DMARC policy upgrade/downgrade, primary-mailbox-provider change, SPF strict→soft regression, MTA-STS / BIMI first publication. Severity tag is good / bad / info.

14. Per-entity detail pages

The top-100 ESPs, top-100 SaaS senders and top-80 mailbox providers each have a dedicated detail page at /email-stats/detail/<kind>/<slug>.html showing KPI cards, a Chart.js sparkline (from history.json), TLD distribution and a sample of customer domains.

15. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k / top-10k / top-100k / top-1M / unranked.

16. Reproducibility & data hygiene

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary file hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept long-term (per OpenINTEL data agreement). The domain registry stores names but no record-level content.

17. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented. The alexa source used for pre-2022 history has a different composition (~960 k domains, US-heavier).
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see § 4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (Mimecast/Proofpoint customers using their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.
  • DKIM enumeration is selector-based — only domains whose well-known selectors are scanned by OpenINTEL appear in the DKIM layer.
  • Long-tail unmatched: ~18.5% of SPF includes belong to a long tail of regional hosters (~84 k unique singletons). This is a fundamental ceiling of any dictionary-based method — filling it would require manual research of 1500+ providers.
  • Newly-added dictionary entries have no historical sparkline until ≥ 2 daily scans accumulate, since archived raw parquet is purged after parsing per the OpenINTEL data agreement.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-06-05 — 659 595 MX, 620 522 SPF2026-06-04 — 660 158 MX, 620 940 SPF2026-06-03 — 660 101 MX, 620 354 SPF2026-06-02 — 660 335 MX, 620 446 SPF2026-06-01 — 662 428 MX, 622 222 SPF2026-05-31 — 667 641 MX, 626 984 SPF2026-05-30 — 663 036 MX, 622 559 SPF2026-05-29 — 663 271 MX, 622 553 SPF2026-05-28 — 663 075 MX, 622 229 SPF2026-05-27 — 663 040 MX, 621 877 SPF2026-05-23 — 660 587 MX, 620 034 SPF2026-05-22 — 657 556 MX, 617 016 SPF2026-05-21 — 659 930 MX, 619 421 SPF2026-05-20 — 659 568 MX, 618 994 SPF2026-05-19 — 661 300 MX, 620 621 SPF2026-05-18 — 653 826 MX, 613 816 SPF2026-05-17 — 652 834 MX, 613 060 SPF2026-05-16 — 653 289 MX, 613 507 SPF2026-05-15 — 653 883 MX, 614 025 SPF2026-05-14 — 654 606 MX, 614 742 SPF2026-05-13 — 654 450 MX, 614 641 SPF2026-05-12 — 654 613 MX, 614 806 SPF2026-05-11 — 654 275 MX, 614 529 SPF2026-05-10 — 654 198 MX, 614 496 SPF2026-05-09 — 654 965 MX, 615 249 SPF2026-05-08 — 664 721 MX, 624 279 SPF2026-05-07 — 662 493 MX, 622 130 SPF2026-05-06 — 661 868 MX, 621 451 SPF2026-05-05 — 662 628 MX, 622 150 SPF2026-05-04 — 662 839 MX, 622 414 SPF2026-05-03 — 671 505 MX, 630 301 SPF2026-05-02 — 666 074 MX, 625 213 SPF2026-05-01 — 664 902 MX, 624 104 SPF2026-04-30 — 665 325 MX, 624 448 SPF2026-04-29 — 665 578 MX, 624 625 SPF2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF2018-05-01 — 1 168 881 MX, 732 275 SPF2018-04-01 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2018-03-01 — 827 056 MX, 516 103 SPF2018-02-01 — 1 195 663 MX, 725 044 SPF2018-01-01 — 813 525 MX, 512 876 SPF2017-12-01 — 818 419 MX, 513 903 SPF2017-11-01 — 815 080 MX, 507 477 SPF2017-10-01 — 823 380 MX, 508 173 SPF2017-09-01 — 815 671 MX, 500 347 SPF2017-08-01 — 829 376 MX, 505 516 SPF2017-07-01 — 830 824 MX, 502 438 SPF2017-06-01 — 828 635 MX, 497 007 SPF2017-05-01 — 828 210 MX, 493 097 SPF2017-04-01 — 828 454 MX, 490 217 SPF2017-03-01 — 824 804 MX, 483 151 SPF2017-02-01 — 839 476 MX, 482 733 SPF2017-01-01 — 827 995 MX, 470 990 SPF2016-12-01 — 825 158 MX, 467 480 SPF2016-11-01 — 837 849 MX, 472 624 SPF2016-10-01 — 838 377 MX, 469 807 SPF2016-09-01 — 835 089 MX, 462 936 SPF2016-08-01 — 848 095 MX, 469 528 SPF2016-07-01 — 842 098 MX, 463 893 SPF2016-06-01 — 848 829 MX, 462 786 SPF2016-05-01 — 843 824 MX, 455 820 SPF2016-04-01 — 843 843 MX, 449 460 SPF2016-03-01 — 865 090 MX, 456 873 SPF2016-02-01 — 862 585 MX, 450 683 SPF2016-01-22 — 845 356 MX, 440 606 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2026-06-06. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-06-07T21:05:39Z.