Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2026-06-07.

649 787
Domains with MX
611 420
Domains with SPF
448 698
Domains with DMARC
649 787
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted →148 87122.91%
2Google Workspace →140 75621.66%
3Microsoft 365 →107 86816.6%
4Unknown / Other →50 4197.76%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) →17 8742.75%
6Proofpoint →12 5291.93%
7Generic / unmatched (mail.*) →11 1301.71%
8Yandex 360 →10 9951.69%
9Mimecast →10 1861.57%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 0931.55%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Hostinger →7 4731.15%
12Namecheap Email Forwarding →6 8771.06%
13Zoho Mail →6 5891.01%
14QQ Mail (Tencent) →5 0890.78%
15GoDaddy →4 8910.75%
16Amazon WorkMail →4 7480.73%
17OVH Mail →4 3980.68%
18Mail.ru for Business →3 7050.57%
19Barracuda →3 4450.53%
201&1 IONOS →3 2750.5%
21Cisco IronPort →3 0810.47%
22SpamExperts (SolarWinds) →2 7660.43%
23Proofpoint Essentials →2 6790.41%
24Jellyfish (Namecheap) →2 5060.39%
25Mailgun (inbound) →2 2850.35%
26Rackspace Email →2 2110.34%
27Beget (RU) →2 1470.33%
28Alibaba Mail (China) →1 9230.3%
29Zoho Mail (EU) →1 6800.26%
30Namecheap PrivateEmail →1 5980.25%
🏠 Open Providers portfolio → cards with country, blurb, sparkline & TLD breakdown — click any provider name above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
12.37%
80 408 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
36 167
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
22.94%
149 050 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Amazon SES →37 8136.18%
2SendGrid (Twilio) →29 1234.76%
3Mailgun →24 8794.07%
4Zendesk →23 7723.89%
5Mailchimp →22 4923.68%
6Mandrill →20 6803.38%
7HubSpot →19 3693.17%
8Salesforce →16 1462.64%
9Mailjet (Sinch) →12 8832.11%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 6861.75%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast →8 8641.45%
12Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) →8 5271.39%
13MailerSend →7 6641.25%
14Namecheap Forwarding →7 1381.17%
15MailChannels →6 5771.08%
16Elastic Email →4 3570.71%
17Unisender (RU) →3 6470.6%
18Constant Contact →3 4640.57%
19Campaign Monitor →3 3680.55%
20Marketo (Adobe) →3 2660.53%
21Zoho Campaigns →3 0980.51%
22Emsd1 (transactional) →2 9780.49%
23SendPulse →2 8800.47%
24Postmark →2 8670.47%
25SparkPost →2 6010.43%
26Zoho ZeptoMail →2 5930.42%
27Exclaimer (signatures) →2 5670.42%
28Help Scout →2 3000.38%
29Salesforce Marketing Cloud →2 2090.36%
30Barracuda Essentials →2 1250.35%
📮 Open Mailing services portfolio → all detected ESPs with descriptions, country, sparklines — click any ESP above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Shopify →4 9300.81%
2Pardot (Salesforce) →4 9020.8%
3CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 →4 2720.7%
4KnowBe4 →3 4430.56%
5Statuspage (Atlassian) →2 1250.35%
6Trustpilot →1 8920.31%
7Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) →1 8310.3%
8Firebase (Google) →1 7370.28%
9Lark / Feishu →1 2670.21%
10BigCommerce →1 1550.19%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle) →1 1220.18%
12Sage Intacct →1 0930.18%
13Qualtrics →1 0860.18%
14Oracle Cloud Email →1 0480.17%
15Docebo (LMS) →9130.15%
16WordPress.com / WP Cloud →8750.14%
17Oracle Cloud →8150.13%
18One.com (DK hosting) →7780.13%
19Zoho Books →6900.11%
20Greenhouse →6210.1%
21AFAS →6170.1%
22SAP SuccessFactors →5850.1%
23PayPal Braintree →5760.09%
24ClickDimensions →5680.09%
25UKG / UltiPro →5410.09%
26RetailCRM →5200.09%
27Autotask (ConnectWise) →5000.08%
28ConnectWise →4630.08%
29TOPdesk →4510.07%
30Freshservice (Freshworks) →4350.07%
📧 Open SaaS/ESP senders portfolio → SaaS apps sending FROM customer domains — click any SaaS name above for detail

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▼ -0.09%30d ago▲ +0.33%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;54 792
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 306
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 210
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 769
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 814
6v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 632
7v=DMARC1;p=none;3 629
8v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;3 332
9v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 140
10v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 104
11v=DMARC1; p=reject2 783
12v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 658
13v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 318
14v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864001 993
15v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 903
16v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;1 889
17v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 762
18v=DMARC1;p=none1 672
19v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:desjardins@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:desjardins@ruf.agari.com;1 634
20v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 393
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 383
22v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 306
23v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 251
24v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 226
25v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 221
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 203
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 055
28v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 013
29v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;980
30v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;963
31v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com925
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com872
33v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s867
34v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email750
35v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com727
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100682
37v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100675
38v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400650
39v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com650
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com611
41v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com607
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;569
43v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400524
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;499
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com498
46v=DMARC1;p=quarantine490
47v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;485
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;445
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;440
50v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s423
51v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;423
52v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r367
53v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1363
54v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r355
55v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;339
56v=DMARC1337
57v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
58v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com333
59v=DMARC1;p=reject330
60v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400322
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;317
62v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;310
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1304
64v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;304
65v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100300
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s284
67v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
68v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r267
69v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400266
70v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1257
71v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100254
72v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com245
73v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;243
74v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;224
75v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp224
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;222
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com212
78v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com210
79v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app203
80v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r202
81v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email202
82v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com201
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;199
84v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject196
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl186
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;186
87v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100184
88v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;179
89v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com179
90v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;178
91v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com175
92v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r175
93v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;174
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1171
95v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;167
96v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r;162
97v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100160
98v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s159
99v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400156
100v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject;154

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1nan4 541
2newman-nyc-do.mirus.io435
3newman-dfw-lin.mirus.io435
4localhost405
5mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net293
6mx.services282
7asapsemi1.mail.protection.office365.us269
8mail236
9mx01.1and1.com201
10mx00.1and1.com197
11mail1.sbnation.com166
12zonemx.eu158
13mail.autoline.com.ua151
14mx2.z-ns.net150
15mx.email-messaging.com144
16~139
17alltheemails.com134
18s.mail.dcsaas.net118
19uk.mx1.mailanyone.net117
20uk.mx2.mx25.net117
21lbmx.bcc.gov.bd117
22uk.mx3.mailanyone.net113
23mxi.alpha-prm.jp112
24se.mx1.mailanyone.net111
25se.mx2.mx25.net111
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx.simply.com109
27uk.mx4.mx25.net109
28mx00.1and1.co.uk107
29se.mx3.mailanyone.net106
30relay1.netnames.net106
31relay2.netnames.net106
32mx1d10.thinline.cz106
33mx1b20.thinline.cz106
34mx01.1and1.co.uk105
35se.mx4.mx25.net105
36mx10.websupport.sk103
37mx20.websupport.sk103
38mx240.umbler.co.uk103
39mx364.umbler.com102
40mx1.cleanmx.pt100
41cloudmail.auto-vision.ru99
42mx2.cleanmx.pt98
43mwpremgw1.ocn.ad.jp98
44mwpremgw2.ocn.ad.jp98
45mailin.mx-hub.cz95
46mailin.mx-hub.sk95
47mx01.lancloud.ru95
48mx02.lancloud.ru95
49void.blackhole.mx94
50mx03.lancloud.ru94
51mx04.lancloud.ru94
52mx01.mailplug.com92
53mx02.mailplug.com91
54mx.zoho.com.au90
55mx2.zoho.com.au90
56mx3.zoho.com.au89
57mailin.mx-hub.eu89
58mx1.ticketsinbound.com86
59amazon-smtp.amazon.com85
60mailforward.dnsv.jp84
61mx-backup.serveriai.lt84
62mx2.ticketsinbound.com83
63antispam1.ihs.com.tr81
64antispam2.ihs.com.tr81
65mx.hetemail.jp80
66mx1-dk.centerasecurity.dk80
67mx2-dk.centerasecurity.dk80
68mx3.name.com80
69mx.maxns.net80
70mx.aams4.jp80
71mx1.atmosphere.facct.ru80
72mx2.atmosphere.facct.ru80
73mx4.name.com79
74smtp-fwd.wordpress.com79
75mx.zoho.com.cn79
76mx6.name.com78
77mx5.name.com78
78mx8.name.com78
79mx2.zoho.com.cn78
80mx7.name.com77
81mx-0.aams4.jp77
82mx-1.aams4.jp77
83mx-01.mail-forwarder.io76
84mxint01.1and1.com75
85mxint02.1and1.com75
86mx1.email-cluster.com75
87mx2.email-cluster.com75
88mx3-dk.centerasecurity.dk74
89mail.global.frontbridge.com74
90mx-02.mail-forwarder.io74
91mx01.1and1.fr73
92sitemail.everyone.net73
93mx00.1and1.fr72
94mx-proxy501.heteml.jp72
95failover1.email-cluster.com72
96mx.vshosting.eu71
97mx-proxy502.heteml.jp70
98smtp-avas.seeweb.it70
99q01es.mail.s-web.de70
100q02es.mail.s-web.de70

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1spf.pitcom.net112
2qcloudmail.com109
3_spf.edhost.eu109
4spf.boldem.cz108
5yunyou.top108
6_spf.maileroo.com107
7_spf.mail-neoserv.si107
8spf.kirim.email106
9spf.ssmx.net105
10_spf.octadesk.com105
11_spf.armada.it104
12gateways.firstdata.com104
13outbound.smtp.wisestamp.net103
14spf.aams4.jp102
15mlrcloud.com101
16_spf.exsilia.net101
17spf.betrend.com101
18_pmta2.antevenio.com100
19spf-2248456.jmsend.com99
20_spf.wpopt.net99
21spf.cesky-hosting.cz98
22spf.263.net97
23send.k-crm.jp97
24spf.splio.com97
25amazon.com97
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.v6send.net96
27spf.satorimail.net96
28spf.spcloud.jp95
29_spf.localservices.com.br95
30relay.thundermail.uk94
31_spf01.mykronos.com94
32spf.squalomail.com94
33spf.mailcamp.nl94
34spf.w4ymail.at94
35_spf.academicworks.com93
36_spf.tld-mx.com92
37_spf.presscloud.com92
38_spf.ogicom.pl92
39spfref.jackhenry.com92
40usermail.zohocreator.com92
41spf.shopserve.jp92
42ofsys.com91
43spf.shared.spaceship.host91
44_spf.sent2email.com91
45fmx.etius.jp91
46spf.greengeeks.net90
47spf.emailfilter.io90
48mailing.eqs.com90
49spf.host-ww.net89
50spf.qb-feedback.com89
51spf89
52_spf-dc10.sapsf.com89
53spf.symplicity.com89
54_spf.simpleviewinc.com89
55smtp-cluster.plusvps.com89
56_spf.aid.no89
57spf.redpoints.com89
58eversrv.com88
59spf-00181c02.pphosted.com88
60_spf.sendnode.com88
61ciphr247.com88
62spf-002fa101.pphosted.com88
63verifymyfafsa.com88
64spf.cyberimpact.com87
65relay.guzelhosting.com86
66spf.sendios.io86
67relay.email-cluster.com85
68sendgrid.com85
69_spf.webglobe.cz85
70no-ip.com85
71spf.w2solution.com85
72_spf.abcp.ru84
73mfg.siteprotect.com84
74spf.oximailing.com84
75senders.mailmasterplus.net84
76mailmailmail.net83
77spf.remarkety.com83
78spf-0024c501.pphosted.com83
79_spf.we.wedos.net83
80spf-00596a01.pphosted.com83
81_spf.eemsg.mail.mil83
82spf.icontroller.eu82
83spf.sosafe.de82
84spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl82
85euromsg.net82
86_spf.shared-server.net82
87spf.protection.outlook81
88_spf.lh.pl81
89universalspf.org81
90x.universalspf.org81
91mail.feedblitz.com80
92custmail.vdata.com80
93spf2.nlk2.smtps.jp79
94_spf.goskope.com79
95mail.zohoanalytics.com78
96_spf.paytsoftware.com78
97spf.qboxmail.com78
98spf.pantheon.io78
99_spf.explore-blue.com77
100spf.gansend.com77

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet. For pre-2022 history we additionally use OpenINTEL's alexa source (the legacy Alexa top-1M list, retired 2023).

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample & cadence

Each report covers a single date — the latest OpenINTEL snapshot with <24h delay, typically ~700 k domains with MX records and ~620 k with SPF. The pipeline runs daily at 23:00 Europe/Moscow; each daily run produces an HTML report, a JSON summary, an updated time-series, and incremental updates to the domain registry (§ 12). No sub-sampling.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py, currently ~310 patterns). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP / SaaS / forwarder / gateway classification (SPF-based)

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against open classification dictionaries (ESPs, mailbox-as-sender, anti-spam gateways, forwarders, SaaS senders, DMARC vendors, NS providers, verification tokens).

Resolution order: PURE_ESP → MAILBOX_AS_SENDER → GATEWAYS → FORWARDERS → bare-apex substring fallback → SAAS_SENDERS substring iteration. Bare-apex derivation strips leading _spf., _spf-eu., spf., mail. prefixes from dict keys to catch subdomain variants (e.g. _spf.m1.websupport.sk → matches websupport.sk). Malformed includes (no dot, <4 chars) are filtered.

One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously, so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains. Current SPF-include classification coverage: ~81.5% (up from ~38.5% baseline).

Limitation: "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IP ranges to fit the 10-lookup limit) is not detectable from DNS alone — those domains appear ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used.

5. DMARC (deep)

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for:

  • p= (apex policy): none / quarantine / reject / invalid
  • sp= (subdomain policy)
  • pct= (rollout percentage)
  • rua= aggregate-report destinations → classified into vendor buckets (Postmark DMARC, Valimail, dmarcian, URIports, EasyDMARC, Red Sift, Proofpoint EFD, Agari/Fortra, …) using dictionaries/dmarc_vendors.py

A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent — defaults to 100).

6. SPF mechanics & health

For every SPF record we additionally extract:

  • Final qualifier on the all mechanism: -all (hard fail), ~all (soft fail), ?all (neutral), +all (pass-everything — broken / dangerous), or missing
  • DNS lookup count (include:, redirect=, a:, mx:, exists:, ptr:) — each mechanism counts as 1 against the spec limit of 10. Records exceeding the limit return PermErr at recipients
  • Mechanism mix: include-only (modern), raw IP4/IP6 ranges only (legacy/flattened), mixed
  • Record byte length: percentiles to flag fragmentation risk (>450 B)

7. Email security maturity

Adoption of modern mail-security TXT records, parsed from the same OpenINTEL parquet:

  • MTA-STS: TXT at _mta-sts.<domain> with v=STSv1 — domain advertises required-TLS to its MX
  • BIMI: TXT at default._bimi.<domain> with v=BIMI1 — brand publishes a verified logo (requires p=reject)
  • TLS-RPT (SMTP TLS Reporting): TXT at _smtp._tls.<domain> with v=TLSRPTv1 — domain monitors TLS-failure reports
  • DKIM selectors: where the OpenINTEL scan includes *._domainkey.<domain> queries, well-known selectors (google, selector1/2, s1/s2, k1/k2/k3, mailo, mte1, …) are mapped to issuing ESPs

8. DNS provider classification

For each domain's NS RRset, every NS hostname is matched against a suffix dictionary (dictionaries/ns_providers.py) with patterns for Cloudflare, AWS Route 53, Azure DNS, Google Cloud DNS, GoDaddy, Akamai, NS1, UltraDNS, Yandex, DNSPod, Aliyun, OVH, Hetzner, Gandi, registrars, and others. A domain is assigned to its dominant NS provider; ties resolve to whichever pattern was matched first.

9. SaaS-via-verification-tokens

Many SaaS apps a domain is connected to never appear in SPF (because the SaaS doesn't send mail FROM the customer domain). To recover this signal we parse apex TXT records for verification tokens — google-site-verification=…, MS=…, atlassian-domain-verification=…, stripe-verification=…, plus ~70 other patterns in dictionaries/verification_tokens.py. This produces a complementary "SaaS density" metric and surfaces apps that the SPF-only view misses.

10. Email infrastructure modernity

Three additional TLS / IPv6 metrics:

  • IPv6-on-MX: MX hostname has at least one AAAA record
  • DANE / TLSA on MX: TLSA record at _25._tcp.<mx_host> (where the parquet includes TLSA queries)
  • CAA: any 0 issue … / 0 issuewild … record at apex; CAs aggregated into a market-share view (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Sectigo, …)

11. Cross-tabulations

  • Country × ESP heatmap: top-15 ccTLDs × top-15 ESPs, cell = % of country's SPF-publishing domains using ESP X. Surfaces regional ESP champions (Brevo / FR, Unisender / RU, MailerLite / LT, Akna / BR, Shoptet / CZ).
  • Mailbox × ESP combinations: stacked frequency of common stack pairings (Google Workspace + HubSpot, MS365 + Marketo, …).

12. Domain registry & identifiers

Every domain ever observed across snapshots is assigned a stable integer ID in /var/openintel-cache/registry/domains.sqlite3 (currently ~1.2 M domains). Reports reference domains by ID rather than embedding strings; clients resolve names from a single gzipped registry dump (/email-stats/domains.csv.gz, ~13 MB). This keeps per-report payloads compact, enables fast set-operation diffs across snapshots, and gives every domain a first-seen / last-seen timestamp.

13. Daily change-alerts feed

Each daily run computes a domain-level diff vs the previous scan and emits a change-feed at /email-stats/alerts.html (also as JSON + Atom). Detected events: ESP added/removed in SPF, DMARC policy upgrade/downgrade, primary-mailbox-provider change, SPF strict→soft regression, MTA-STS / BIMI first publication. Severity tag is good / bad / info.

14. Per-entity detail pages

The top-100 ESPs, top-100 SaaS senders and top-80 mailbox providers each have a dedicated detail page at /email-stats/detail/<kind>/<slug>.html showing KPI cards, a Chart.js sparkline (from history.json), TLD distribution and a sample of customer domains.

15. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k / top-10k / top-100k / top-1M / unranked.

16. Reproducibility & data hygiene

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary file hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept long-term (per OpenINTEL data agreement). The domain registry stores names but no record-level content.

17. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented. The alexa source used for pre-2022 history has a different composition (~960 k domains, US-heavier).
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see § 4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (Mimecast/Proofpoint customers using their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.
  • DKIM enumeration is selector-based — only domains whose well-known selectors are scanned by OpenINTEL appear in the DKIM layer.
  • Long-tail unmatched: ~18.5% of SPF includes belong to a long tail of regional hosters (~84 k unique singletons). This is a fundamental ceiling of any dictionary-based method — filling it would require manual research of 1500+ providers.
  • Newly-added dictionary entries have no historical sparkline until ≥ 2 daily scans accumulate, since archived raw parquet is purged after parsing per the OpenINTEL data agreement.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-06-06 — 658 426 MX, 619 451 SPF2026-06-05 — 659 595 MX, 620 522 SPF2026-06-04 — 660 158 MX, 620 940 SPF2026-06-03 — 660 101 MX, 620 354 SPF2026-06-02 — 660 335 MX, 620 446 SPF2026-06-01 — 662 428 MX, 622 222 SPF2026-05-31 — 667 641 MX, 626 984 SPF2026-05-30 — 663 036 MX, 622 559 SPF2026-05-29 — 663 271 MX, 622 553 SPF2026-05-28 — 663 075 MX, 622 229 SPF2026-05-27 — 663 040 MX, 621 877 SPF2026-05-23 — 660 587 MX, 620 034 SPF2026-05-22 — 657 556 MX, 617 016 SPF2026-05-21 — 659 930 MX, 619 421 SPF2026-05-20 — 659 568 MX, 618 994 SPF2026-05-19 — 661 300 MX, 620 621 SPF2026-05-18 — 653 826 MX, 613 816 SPF2026-05-17 — 652 834 MX, 613 060 SPF2026-05-16 — 653 289 MX, 613 507 SPF2026-05-15 — 653 883 MX, 614 025 SPF2026-05-14 — 654 606 MX, 614 742 SPF2026-05-13 — 654 450 MX, 614 641 SPF2026-05-12 — 654 613 MX, 614 806 SPF2026-05-11 — 654 275 MX, 614 529 SPF2026-05-10 — 654 198 MX, 614 496 SPF2026-05-09 — 654 965 MX, 615 249 SPF2026-05-08 — 664 721 MX, 624 279 SPF2026-05-07 — 662 493 MX, 622 130 SPF2026-05-06 — 661 868 MX, 621 451 SPF2026-05-05 — 662 628 MX, 622 150 SPF2026-05-04 — 662 839 MX, 622 414 SPF2026-05-03 — 671 505 MX, 630 301 SPF2026-05-02 — 666 074 MX, 625 213 SPF2026-05-01 — 664 902 MX, 624 104 SPF2026-04-30 — 665 325 MX, 624 448 SPF2026-04-29 — 665 578 MX, 624 625 SPF2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF2018-05-01 — 1 168 881 MX, 732 275 SPF2018-04-01 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2018-03-01 — 827 056 MX, 516 103 SPF2018-02-01 — 1 195 663 MX, 725 044 SPF2018-01-01 — 813 525 MX, 512 876 SPF2017-12-01 — 818 419 MX, 513 903 SPF2017-11-01 — 815 080 MX, 507 477 SPF2017-10-01 — 823 380 MX, 508 173 SPF2017-09-01 — 815 671 MX, 500 347 SPF2017-08-01 — 829 376 MX, 505 516 SPF2017-07-01 — 830 824 MX, 502 438 SPF2017-06-01 — 828 635 MX, 497 007 SPF2017-05-01 — 828 210 MX, 493 097 SPF2017-04-01 — 828 454 MX, 490 217 SPF2017-03-01 — 824 804 MX, 483 151 SPF2017-02-01 — 839 476 MX, 482 733 SPF2017-01-01 — 827 995 MX, 470 990 SPF2016-12-01 — 825 158 MX, 467 480 SPF2016-11-01 — 837 849 MX, 472 624 SPF2016-10-01 — 838 377 MX, 469 807 SPF2016-09-01 — 835 089 MX, 462 936 SPF2016-08-01 — 848 095 MX, 469 528 SPF2016-07-01 — 842 098 MX, 463 893 SPF2016-06-01 — 848 829 MX, 462 786 SPF2016-05-01 — 843 824 MX, 455 820 SPF2016-04-01 — 843 843 MX, 449 460 SPF2016-03-01 — 865 090 MX, 456 873 SPF2016-02-01 — 862 585 MX, 450 683 SPF2016-01-22 — 845 356 MX, 440 606 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2026-06-07. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-06-08T21:05:32Z.