Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2026-06-08.

650 013
Domains with MX
611 648
Domains with SPF
448 928
Domains with DMARC
650 013
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted →148 91422.91%
2Google Workspace →140 76121.66%
3Microsoft 365 →107 85916.59%
4Unknown / Other →50 5217.77%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) →17 8522.75%
6Proofpoint →12 5251.93%
7Generic / unmatched (mail.*) →11 1071.71%
8Yandex 360 →10 9901.69%
9Mimecast →10 1791.57%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 1111.56%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Hostinger →7 5291.16%
12Namecheap Email Forwarding →6 8841.06%
13Zoho Mail →6 5821.01%
14QQ Mail (Tencent) →5 1070.79%
15GoDaddy →4 8950.75%
16Amazon WorkMail →4 7370.73%
17OVH Mail →4 4070.68%
18Mail.ru for Business →3 7100.57%
19Barracuda →3 4430.53%
201&1 IONOS →3 2770.5%
21Cisco IronPort →3 0730.47%
22SpamExperts (SolarWinds) →2 7810.43%
23Proofpoint Essentials →2 6770.41%
24Jellyfish (Namecheap) →2 5120.39%
25Mailgun (inbound) →2 2880.35%
26Rackspace Email →2 2070.34%
27Beget (RU) →2 1440.33%
28Alibaba Mail (China) →1 9290.3%
29Zoho Mail (EU) →1 6790.26%
30Namecheap PrivateEmail →1 6010.25%
🏠 Open Providers portfolio → cards with country, blurb, sparkline & TLD breakdown — click any provider name above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
12.38%
80 463 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
36 126
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
22.94%
149 092 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Amazon SES →37 7826.18%
2SendGrid (Twilio) →29 1084.76%
3Mailgun →24 8934.07%
4Zendesk →23 7573.88%
5Mailchimp →22 4823.68%
6Mandrill →20 6593.38%
7HubSpot →19 3783.17%
8Salesforce →16 1452.64%
9Mailjet (Sinch) →12 8842.11%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →10 7011.75%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast →8 8641.45%
12Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) →8 5221.39%
13MailerSend →7 6651.25%
14Namecheap Forwarding →7 1421.17%
15MailChannels →6 5641.07%
16Elastic Email →4 3530.71%
17Unisender (RU) →3 6480.6%
18Constant Contact →3 4650.57%
19Campaign Monitor →3 3670.55%
20Marketo (Adobe) →3 2670.53%
21Zoho Campaigns →3 0970.51%
22Emsd1 (transactional) →2 9740.49%
23SendPulse →2 8780.47%
24Postmark →2 8660.47%
25SparkPost →2 6030.43%
26Zoho ZeptoMail →2 5910.42%
27Exclaimer (signatures) →2 5730.42%
28Help Scout →2 2990.38%
29Salesforce Marketing Cloud →2 2090.36%
30Barracuda Essentials →2 1240.35%
📮 Open Mailing services portfolio → all detected ESPs with descriptions, country, sparklines — click any ESP above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Shopify →4 9160.8%
2Pardot (Salesforce) →4 9010.8%
3CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 →4 2700.7%
4KnowBe4 →3 4400.56%
5Statuspage (Atlassian) →2 1240.35%
6Trustpilot →1 8900.31%
7Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) →1 8330.3%
8Firebase (Google) →1 7380.28%
9Lark / Feishu →1 2670.21%
10BigCommerce →1 1540.19%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle) →1 1220.18%
12Sage Intacct →1 0930.18%
13Qualtrics →1 0870.18%
14Oracle Cloud Email →1 0470.17%
15Docebo (LMS) →9130.15%
16WordPress.com / WP Cloud →8770.14%
17Oracle Cloud →8150.13%
18One.com (DK hosting) →7780.13%
19Zoho Books →6880.11%
20Greenhouse →6210.1%
21AFAS →6170.1%
22SAP SuccessFactors →5840.1%
23PayPal Braintree →5760.09%
24ClickDimensions →5690.09%
25UKG / UltiPro →5410.09%
26RetailCRM →5230.09%
27Autotask (ConnectWise) →5020.08%
28ConnectWise →4590.08%
29TOPdesk →4470.07%
30Freshservice (Freshworks) →4350.07%
📧 Open SaaS/ESP senders portfolio → SaaS apps sending FROM customer domains — click any SaaS name above for detail

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.10%30d ago▲ +0.43%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;54 855
2v=DMARC1; p=none31 370
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 223
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 770
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 813
6v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 636
7v=DMARC1;p=none;3 627
8v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;3 330
9v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 137
10v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 106
11v=DMARC1; p=reject2 756
12v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 671
13v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 330
14v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;2 031
15v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864001 987
16v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;1 907
17v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 769
18v=DMARC1;p=none1 680
19v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:desjardins@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:desjardins@ruf.agari.com;1 632
20v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 401
21v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 383
22v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 304
23v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 250
24v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 229
25v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 221
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 199
27v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 058
28v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 008
29v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;976
30v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;968
31v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com922
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com872
33v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s865
34v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com768
35v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email750
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100680
37v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100674
38v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com655
39v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400648
40v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com614
41v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com612
42v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;570
43v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400525
44v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;496
45v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com493
46v=DMARC1;p=quarantine491
47v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;486
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;446
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;440
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;423
51v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s421
52v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r365
53v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1363
54v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r355
55v=DMARC1339
56v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;336
57v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;334
58v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com332
59v=DMARC1;p=reject326
60v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400322
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;315
62v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;310
63v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;306
64v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1305
65v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100301
66v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s293
67v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
68v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r268
69v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400266
70v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1257
71v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100253
72v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com247
73v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;247
74v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;224
75v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp224
76v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;220
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com212
78v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com209
79v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r203
80v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app203
81v=DMARC1;""p=none;""rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email202
82v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com201
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;199
84v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject194
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl187
86v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;186
87v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100185
88v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;181
89v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;179
90v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com178
91v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com176
92v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r175
93v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;175
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1171
95v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;167
96v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r;162
97v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100160
98v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s158
99v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject;156
100v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400156

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1nan4 665
2newman-nyc-do.mirus.io435
3newman-dfw-lin.mirus.io435
4localhost394
5mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net293
6mx.services281
7asapsemi1.mail.protection.office365.us269
8mail239
9mx01.1and1.com203
10mx00.1and1.com199
11mail1.sbnation.com166
12zonemx.eu157
13mail.autoline.com.ua151
14mx2.z-ns.net150
15mx.email-messaging.com144
16~141
17alltheemails.com131
18s.mail.dcsaas.net118
19uk.mx1.mailanyone.net117
20uk.mx2.mx25.net117
21lbmx.bcc.gov.bd117
22uk.mx3.mailanyone.net113
23mxi.alpha-prm.jp112
24se.mx1.mailanyone.net111
25se.mx2.mx25.net111
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26uk.mx4.mx25.net109
27mx00.1and1.co.uk108
28mx.simply.com107
29mx01.1and1.co.uk106
30se.mx3.mailanyone.net106
31relay1.netnames.net106
32relay2.netnames.net106
33mx1d10.thinline.cz106
34mx1b20.thinline.cz106
35se.mx4.mx25.net105
36mx10.websupport.sk104
37mx20.websupport.sk104
38mx240.umbler.co.uk103
39mx1.cleanmx.pt102
40mx364.umbler.com102
41mx2.cleanmx.pt100
42cloudmail.auto-vision.ru99
43mwpremgw1.ocn.ad.jp98
44mwpremgw2.ocn.ad.jp98
45mailin.mx-hub.cz95
46mailin.mx-hub.sk95
47mx01.lancloud.ru95
48mx02.lancloud.ru95
49mx03.lancloud.ru94
50mx04.lancloud.ru94
51void.blackhole.mx93
52mx01.mailplug.com92
53mx02.mailplug.com91
54mx.zoho.com.au90
55mx2.zoho.com.au90
56mx3.zoho.com.au89
57mailin.mx-hub.eu89
58mx1.ticketsinbound.com86
59amazon-smtp.amazon.com85
60mx-backup.serveriai.lt84
61mailforward.dnsv.jp83
62mx2.ticketsinbound.com83
63mx.hetemail.jp81
64mx1-dk.centerasecurity.dk81
65mx2-dk.centerasecurity.dk81
66antispam1.ihs.com.tr81
67antispam2.ihs.com.tr81
68mx.zoho.com.cn81
69mx3.name.com80
70mx.maxns.net80
71mx.aams4.jp80
72mx1.atmosphere.facct.ru80
73mx2.atmosphere.facct.ru80
74mx2.zoho.com.cn80
75mx4.name.com79
76smtp-fwd.wordpress.com79
77mx6.name.com78
78mx5.name.com78
79mx8.name.com78
80mx7.name.com77
81mx-0.aams4.jp77
82mx-1.aams4.jp77
83mx-01.mail-forwarder.io76
84mxint01.1and1.com75
85mxint02.1and1.com75
86mx3-dk.centerasecurity.dk75
87mail.global.frontbridge.com74
88mx-02.mail-forwarder.io74
89mx1.email-cluster.com74
90mx2.email-cluster.com74
91mx01.1and1.fr73
92sitemail.everyone.net73
93mx00.1and1.fr72
94mx-proxy501.heteml.jp72
95failover1.email-cluster.com71
96mx.vshosting.eu71
97mx-proxy502.heteml.jp70
98q01es.mail.s-web.de70
99q02es.mail.s-web.de70
100r01es.mail.s-web.de70

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1spf.pitcom.net112
2yunyou.top110
3qcloudmail.com110
4_spf.edhost.eu109
5spf.boldem.cz108
6_spf.mail-neoserv.si107
7_spf.maileroo.com107
8spf.kirim.email106
9_spf.octadesk.com106
10gateways.firstdata.com105
11spf.ssmx.net105
12_spf.armada.it104
13outbound.smtp.wisestamp.net103
14spf.aams4.jp102
15spf.betrend.com102
16_spf.exsilia.net101
17mlrcloud.com100
18_pmta2.antevenio.com99
19_spf.wpopt.net98
20spf-2248456.jmsend.com98
21spf.263.net97
22spf.cesky-hosting.cz97
23spf.splio.com97
24amazon.com97
25send.k-crm.jp97
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.satorimail.net96
27spf.v6send.net96
28relay.thundermail.uk95
29spf.w4ymail.at95
30_spf.localservices.com.br95
31_spf01.mykronos.com94
32spf.squalomail.com94
33spf.mailcamp.nl93
34spf.spcloud.jp93
35_spf.academicworks.com93
36_spf.tld-mx.com92
37spf.shared.spaceship.host92
38_spf.ogicom.pl92
39spf.shopserve.jp92
40spfref.jackhenry.com92
41usermail.zohocreator.com92
42ofsys.com91
43spf.host-ww.net90
44_spf.sent2email.com90
45mailing.eqs.com90
46spf.emailfilter.io90
47_spf.presscloud.com90
48fmx.etius.jp90
49spf.symplicity.com90
50spf.greengeeks.net89
51spf.qb-feedback.com89
52_spf-dc10.sapsf.com89
53spf.redpoints.com89
54_spf.simpleviewinc.com89
55_spf.aid.no89
56verifymyfafsa.com89
57eversrv.com88
58_spf.sendnode.com88
59smtp-cluster.plusvps.com88
60ciphr247.com88
61spf88
62spf.cyberimpact.com87
63spf-002fa101.pphosted.com87
64relay.guzelhosting.com87
65spf-00181c02.pphosted.com86
66spf.sendios.io86
67no-ip.com85
68sendgrid.com85
69spf.w2solution.com85
70mfg.siteprotect.com84
71mailmailmail.net84
72relay.email-cluster.com84
73spf.oximailing.com84
74senders.mailmasterplus.net84
75_spf.webglobe.cz84
76spf-00596a01.pphosted.com84
77_spf.abcp.ru84
78_spf.we.wedos.net83
79spf-0024c501.pphosted.com83
80spf.icontroller.eu82
81spf.sosafe.de82
82_spf.eemsg.mail.mil82
83spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl82
84euromsg.net82
85_spf.shared-server.net82
86spf.remarkety.com82
87universalspf.org81
88x.universalspf.org81
89_spf.lh.pl81
90mail.feedblitz.com81
91_spf.goskope.com80
92spf.protection.outlook80
93spf2.nlk2.smtps.jp80
94custmail.vdata.com80
95_spf.paytsoftware.com79
96spf.pantheon.io78
97sender.zcsend.jp78
98mail.zohoanalytics.com78
99spf.qboxmail.com78
100_spf.explore-blue.com77

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet. For pre-2022 history we additionally use OpenINTEL's alexa source (the legacy Alexa top-1M list, retired 2023).

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample & cadence

Each report covers a single date — the latest OpenINTEL snapshot with <24h delay, typically ~700 k domains with MX records and ~620 k with SPF. The pipeline runs daily at 23:00 Europe/Moscow; each daily run produces an HTML report, a JSON summary, an updated time-series, and incremental updates to the domain registry (§ 12). No sub-sampling.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py, currently ~310 patterns). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP / SaaS / forwarder / gateway classification (SPF-based)

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against open classification dictionaries (ESPs, mailbox-as-sender, anti-spam gateways, forwarders, SaaS senders, DMARC vendors, NS providers, verification tokens).

Resolution order: PURE_ESP → MAILBOX_AS_SENDER → GATEWAYS → FORWARDERS → bare-apex substring fallback → SAAS_SENDERS substring iteration. Bare-apex derivation strips leading _spf., _spf-eu., spf., mail. prefixes from dict keys to catch subdomain variants (e.g. _spf.m1.websupport.sk → matches websupport.sk). Malformed includes (no dot, <4 chars) are filtered.

One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously, so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains. Current SPF-include classification coverage: ~81.5% (up from ~38.5% baseline).

Limitation: "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IP ranges to fit the 10-lookup limit) is not detectable from DNS alone — those domains appear ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used.

5. DMARC (deep)

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for:

  • p= (apex policy): none / quarantine / reject / invalid
  • sp= (subdomain policy)
  • pct= (rollout percentage)
  • rua= aggregate-report destinations → classified into vendor buckets (Postmark DMARC, Valimail, dmarcian, URIports, EasyDMARC, Red Sift, Proofpoint EFD, Agari/Fortra, …) using dictionaries/dmarc_vendors.py

A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent — defaults to 100).

6. SPF mechanics & health

For every SPF record we additionally extract:

  • Final qualifier on the all mechanism: -all (hard fail), ~all (soft fail), ?all (neutral), +all (pass-everything — broken / dangerous), or missing
  • DNS lookup count (include:, redirect=, a:, mx:, exists:, ptr:) — each mechanism counts as 1 against the spec limit of 10. Records exceeding the limit return PermErr at recipients
  • Mechanism mix: include-only (modern), raw IP4/IP6 ranges only (legacy/flattened), mixed
  • Record byte length: percentiles to flag fragmentation risk (>450 B)

7. Email security maturity

Adoption of modern mail-security TXT records, parsed from the same OpenINTEL parquet:

  • MTA-STS: TXT at _mta-sts.<domain> with v=STSv1 — domain advertises required-TLS to its MX
  • BIMI: TXT at default._bimi.<domain> with v=BIMI1 — brand publishes a verified logo (requires p=reject)
  • TLS-RPT (SMTP TLS Reporting): TXT at _smtp._tls.<domain> with v=TLSRPTv1 — domain monitors TLS-failure reports
  • DKIM selectors: where the OpenINTEL scan includes *._domainkey.<domain> queries, well-known selectors (google, selector1/2, s1/s2, k1/k2/k3, mailo, mte1, …) are mapped to issuing ESPs

8. DNS provider classification

For each domain's NS RRset, every NS hostname is matched against a suffix dictionary (dictionaries/ns_providers.py) with patterns for Cloudflare, AWS Route 53, Azure DNS, Google Cloud DNS, GoDaddy, Akamai, NS1, UltraDNS, Yandex, DNSPod, Aliyun, OVH, Hetzner, Gandi, registrars, and others. A domain is assigned to its dominant NS provider; ties resolve to whichever pattern was matched first.

9. SaaS-via-verification-tokens

Many SaaS apps a domain is connected to never appear in SPF (because the SaaS doesn't send mail FROM the customer domain). To recover this signal we parse apex TXT records for verification tokens — google-site-verification=…, MS=…, atlassian-domain-verification=…, stripe-verification=…, plus ~70 other patterns in dictionaries/verification_tokens.py. This produces a complementary "SaaS density" metric and surfaces apps that the SPF-only view misses.

10. Email infrastructure modernity

Three additional TLS / IPv6 metrics:

  • IPv6-on-MX: MX hostname has at least one AAAA record
  • DANE / TLSA on MX: TLSA record at _25._tcp.<mx_host> (where the parquet includes TLSA queries)
  • CAA: any 0 issue … / 0 issuewild … record at apex; CAs aggregated into a market-share view (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Sectigo, …)

11. Cross-tabulations

  • Country × ESP heatmap: top-15 ccTLDs × top-15 ESPs, cell = % of country's SPF-publishing domains using ESP X. Surfaces regional ESP champions (Brevo / FR, Unisender / RU, MailerLite / LT, Akna / BR, Shoptet / CZ).
  • Mailbox × ESP combinations: stacked frequency of common stack pairings (Google Workspace + HubSpot, MS365 + Marketo, …).

12. Domain registry & identifiers

Every domain ever observed across snapshots is assigned a stable integer ID in /var/openintel-cache/registry/domains.sqlite3 (currently ~1.2 M domains). Reports reference domains by ID rather than embedding strings; clients resolve names from a single gzipped registry dump (/email-stats/domains.csv.gz, ~13 MB). This keeps per-report payloads compact, enables fast set-operation diffs across snapshots, and gives every domain a first-seen / last-seen timestamp.

13. Daily change-alerts feed

Each daily run computes a domain-level diff vs the previous scan and emits a change-feed at /email-stats/alerts.html (also as JSON + Atom). Detected events: ESP added/removed in SPF, DMARC policy upgrade/downgrade, primary-mailbox-provider change, SPF strict→soft regression, MTA-STS / BIMI first publication. Severity tag is good / bad / info.

14. Per-entity detail pages

The top-100 ESPs, top-100 SaaS senders and top-80 mailbox providers each have a dedicated detail page at /email-stats/detail/<kind>/<slug>.html showing KPI cards, a Chart.js sparkline (from history.json), TLD distribution and a sample of customer domains.

15. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k / top-10k / top-100k / top-1M / unranked.

16. Reproducibility & data hygiene

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary file hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept long-term (per OpenINTEL data agreement). The domain registry stores names but no record-level content.

17. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented. The alexa source used for pre-2022 history has a different composition (~960 k domains, US-heavier).
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see § 4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (Mimecast/Proofpoint customers using their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.
  • DKIM enumeration is selector-based — only domains whose well-known selectors are scanned by OpenINTEL appear in the DKIM layer.
  • Long-tail unmatched: ~18.5% of SPF includes belong to a long tail of regional hosters (~84 k unique singletons). This is a fundamental ceiling of any dictionary-based method — filling it would require manual research of 1500+ providers.
  • Newly-added dictionary entries have no historical sparkline until ≥ 2 daily scans accumulate, since archived raw parquet is purged after parsing per the OpenINTEL data agreement.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-06-07 — 649 787 MX, 611 420 SPF2026-06-06 — 658 426 MX, 619 451 SPF2026-06-05 — 659 595 MX, 620 522 SPF2026-06-04 — 660 158 MX, 620 940 SPF2026-06-03 — 660 101 MX, 620 354 SPF2026-06-02 — 660 335 MX, 620 446 SPF2026-06-01 — 662 428 MX, 622 222 SPF2026-05-31 — 667 641 MX, 626 984 SPF2026-05-30 — 663 036 MX, 622 559 SPF2026-05-29 — 663 271 MX, 622 553 SPF2026-05-28 — 663 075 MX, 622 229 SPF2026-05-27 — 663 040 MX, 621 877 SPF2026-05-23 — 660 587 MX, 620 034 SPF2026-05-22 — 657 556 MX, 617 016 SPF2026-05-21 — 659 930 MX, 619 421 SPF2026-05-20 — 659 568 MX, 618 994 SPF2026-05-19 — 661 300 MX, 620 621 SPF2026-05-18 — 653 826 MX, 613 816 SPF2026-05-17 — 652 834 MX, 613 060 SPF2026-05-16 — 653 289 MX, 613 507 SPF2026-05-15 — 653 883 MX, 614 025 SPF2026-05-14 — 654 606 MX, 614 742 SPF2026-05-13 — 654 450 MX, 614 641 SPF2026-05-12 — 654 613 MX, 614 806 SPF2026-05-11 — 654 275 MX, 614 529 SPF2026-05-10 — 654 198 MX, 614 496 SPF2026-05-09 — 654 965 MX, 615 249 SPF2026-05-08 — 664 721 MX, 624 279 SPF2026-05-07 — 662 493 MX, 622 130 SPF2026-05-06 — 661 868 MX, 621 451 SPF2026-05-05 — 662 628 MX, 622 150 SPF2026-05-04 — 662 839 MX, 622 414 SPF2026-05-03 — 671 505 MX, 630 301 SPF2026-05-02 — 666 074 MX, 625 213 SPF2026-05-01 — 664 902 MX, 624 104 SPF2026-04-30 — 665 325 MX, 624 448 SPF2026-04-29 — 665 578 MX, 624 625 SPF2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF2018-05-01 — 1 168 881 MX, 732 275 SPF2018-04-01 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2018-03-01 — 827 056 MX, 516 103 SPF2018-02-01 — 1 195 663 MX, 725 044 SPF2018-01-01 — 813 525 MX, 512 876 SPF2017-12-01 — 818 419 MX, 513 903 SPF2017-11-01 — 815 080 MX, 507 477 SPF2017-10-01 — 823 380 MX, 508 173 SPF2017-09-01 — 815 671 MX, 500 347 SPF2017-08-01 — 829 376 MX, 505 516 SPF2017-07-01 — 830 824 MX, 502 438 SPF2017-06-01 — 828 635 MX, 497 007 SPF2017-05-01 — 828 210 MX, 493 097 SPF2017-04-01 — 828 454 MX, 490 217 SPF2017-03-01 — 824 804 MX, 483 151 SPF2017-02-01 — 839 476 MX, 482 733 SPF2017-01-01 — 827 995 MX, 470 990 SPF2016-12-01 — 825 158 MX, 467 480 SPF2016-11-01 — 837 849 MX, 472 624 SPF2016-10-01 — 838 377 MX, 469 807 SPF2016-09-01 — 835 089 MX, 462 936 SPF2016-08-01 — 848 095 MX, 469 528 SPF2016-07-01 — 842 098 MX, 463 893 SPF2016-06-01 — 848 829 MX, 462 786 SPF2016-05-01 — 843 824 MX, 455 820 SPF2016-04-01 — 843 843 MX, 449 460 SPF2016-03-01 — 865 090 MX, 456 873 SPF2016-02-01 — 862 585 MX, 450 683 SPF2016-01-22 — 845 356 MX, 440 606 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2026-06-08. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-06-09T21:05:35Z.