Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2026-06-27.

666 220
Domains with MX
624 986
Domains with SPF
459 796
Domains with DMARC
666 220
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted →151 85122.79%
2Google Workspace →143 91121.6%
3Microsoft 365 →111 10716.68%
4Unknown / Other →52 4497.87%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) →18 2272.74%
6Proofpoint →12 7801.92%
7Generic / unmatched (mail.*) →11 5201.73%
8Yandex 360 →11 0141.65%
9Cloudflare Email Routing →10 5081.58%
10Mimecast →10 3271.55%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Hostinger →7 5281.13%
12Zoho Mail →6 6971.01%
13Namecheap Email Forwarding →6 5900.99%
14QQ Mail (Tencent) →5 5760.84%
15GoDaddy →4 8560.73%
16Amazon WorkMail →4 7350.71%
17OVH Mail →4 5980.69%
18Mail.ru for Business →3 6850.55%
19Barracuda →3 5530.53%
201&1 IONOS →3 5470.53%
21SpamExperts (SolarWinds) →2 8940.43%
22Proofpoint Essentials →2 8380.43%
23Cisco IronPort →2 7590.41%
24Jellyfish (Namecheap) →2 6880.4%
25Mailgun (inbound) →2 2890.34%
26Beget (RU) →2 2740.34%
27Rackspace Email →2 2720.34%
28Alibaba Mail (China) →2 0920.31%
29Zoho Mail (EU) →1 7470.26%
30ProtonMail →1 6540.25%
🏠 Open Providers portfolio → cards with country, blurb, sparkline & TLD breakdown — click any provider name above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
12.49%
83 235 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
36 877
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
22.82%
152 028 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Amazon SES →38 6406.18%
2SendGrid (Twilio) →29 7754.76%
3Mailgun →25 5214.08%
4Zendesk →24 1013.86%
5Mailchimp →23 1383.7%
6Mandrill →21 1413.38%
7HubSpot →20 1403.22%
8Salesforce →16 4242.63%
9Mailjet (Sinch) →13 2742.12%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →11 1191.78%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast →9 0301.44%
12Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) →8 8191.41%
13MailerSend →7 9101.27%
14Namecheap Forwarding →6 8751.1%
15MailChannels →6 7021.07%
16Elastic Email →4 4040.7%
17Unisender (RU) →3 6440.58%
18Constant Contact →3 6190.58%
19Campaign Monitor →3 4830.56%
20Marketo (Adobe) →3 3120.53%
21Zoho Campaigns →3 2380.52%
22Emsd1 (transactional) →3 0230.48%
23Postmark →2 9640.47%
24SendPulse →2 9190.47%
25SparkPost →2 6860.43%
26Exclaimer (signatures) →2 6820.43%
27Zoho ZeptoMail →2 6710.43%
28Help Scout →2 3550.38%
29Salesforce Marketing Cloud →2 2200.36%
30Barracuda Essentials →2 1820.35%
📮 Open Mailing services portfolio → all detected ESPs with descriptions, country, sparklines — click any ESP above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Shopify →5 2510.84%
2Pardot (Salesforce) →4 9800.8%
3CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 →4 4850.72%
4KnowBe4 →3 5560.57%
5Statuspage (Atlassian) →2 1470.34%
6Trustpilot →1 8890.3%
7Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) →1 8750.3%
8Firebase (Google) →1 8210.29%
9Lark / Feishu →1 2970.21%
10BigCommerce →1 1920.19%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle) →1 1420.18%
12Sage Intacct →1 1290.18%
13Qualtrics →1 1020.18%
14Oracle Cloud Email →1 0650.17%
15Docebo (LMS) →9310.15%
16WordPress.com / WP Cloud →9140.15%
17Oracle Cloud →8330.13%
18One.com (DK hosting) →7920.13%
19Zoho Books →7070.11%
20AFAS →6620.11%
21Greenhouse →6230.1%
22SAP SuccessFactors →5960.1%
23PayPal Braintree →5810.09%
24ClickDimensions →5760.09%
25UKG / UltiPro →5640.09%
26Autotask (ConnectWise) →5040.08%
27RetailCRM →4890.08%
28ConnectWise →4670.07%
29TOPdesk →4650.07%
30FormAssembly →4500.07%
📧 Open SaaS/ESP senders portfolio → SaaS apps sending FROM customer domains — click any SaaS name above for detail

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▲ +0.08%30d ago▲ +0.06%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;56 434
2v=DMARC1; p=none32 090
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 551
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 941
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine3 982
6v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 745
7v=DMARC1;p=none;3 677
8v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 165
9v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 163
10v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;3 131
11v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;2 983
12v=DMARC1; p=reject2 877
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 643
14v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 377
15v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 053
16v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;2 007
17v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 825
18v=DMARC1;p=none1 762
19v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 462
20v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 442
21v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 300
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 291
23v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 256
24v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 240
25v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 225
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com1 001
27v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none988
28v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;983
29v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;982
30v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;978
31v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com912
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com882
33v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s822
34v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email759
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100723
36v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100711
37v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com704
38v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com676
39v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400659
40v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com616
41v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;576
42v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400551
43v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;530
44v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com517
45v=DMARC1;p=quarantine514
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;508
47v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s458
48v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;455
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;440
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;430
51v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r379
52v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r367
53v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1364
54v=DMARC1351
55v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;343
56v=DMARC1;p=reject331
57v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;329
58v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s328
59v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com323
60v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;307
61v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1304
62v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400304
63v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100300
64v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;293
65v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;281
66v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r276
67v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400274
68v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com271
69v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;267
70v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1255
71v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com251
72v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100245
73v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;235
74v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com234
75v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;228
76v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp215
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r211
78v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com211
79v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com204
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;203
81v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;201
82v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; aspf=s; pct=100197
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject195
84v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app190
85v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;186
86v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;185
87v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r185
88v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100185
89v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com184
90v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;183
91v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl182
92v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;181
93v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com181
94v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;174
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1172
96v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zsrbf6su@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com;171
97v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r;167
98v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400165
99v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r159
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100158

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1nan5 850
2localhost473
3asapsemi1.mail.protection.office365.us364
4mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net321
5mx.services265
6mail260
7mx01.1and1.com210
8mx00.1and1.com205
9zonemx.eu182
10mail1.sbnation.com168
11mail.autoline.com.ua155
12mx2.z-ns.net154
13alltheemails.com150
14~148
15mx.email-messaging.com141
16mx00.1and1.co.uk120
17lbmx.bcc.gov.bd119
18mx01.1and1.co.uk117
19uk.mx1.mailanyone.net117
20uk.mx2.mx25.net117
21mxi.alpha-prm.jp113
22relay1.netnames.net113
23relay2.netnames.net113
24uk.mx3.mailanyone.net113
25se.mx1.mailanyone.net111
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26se.mx2.mx25.net111
27mx1.cleanmx.pt111
28mx1d10.thinline.cz110
29mx1b20.thinline.cz110
30mx240.umbler.co.uk110
31mx2.cleanmx.pt109
32mx364.umbler.com109
33s.mail.dcsaas.net109
34mx.simply.com108
35uk.mx4.mx25.net108
36se.mx3.mailanyone.net107
37mx10.websupport.sk107
38mx20.websupport.sk107
39se.mx4.mx25.net106
40mx1.ticketsinbound.com103
41cloudmail.auto-vision.ru99
42mx2.ticketsinbound.com99
43mx.maxns.net98
44mwpremgw1.ocn.ad.jp97
45mwpremgw2.ocn.ad.jp97
46mailin.mx-hub.cz93
47mailin.mx-hub.sk93
48mx.zoho.com.au92
49mx2.zoho.com.au92
50mx3.zoho.com.au91
51mx01.lancloud.ru90
52mx02.lancloud.ru90
53mx01.mailplug.com89
54smtp-fwd.wordpress.com89
55mx03.lancloud.ru89
56mx04.lancloud.ru89
57mx3.name.com88
58mx02.mailplug.com88
59mailin.mx-hub.eu88
60mail.vipmailservice.com88
61mx4.name.com87
62mx1-dk.centerasecurity.dk86
63mx2-dk.centerasecurity.dk86
64mx6.name.com86
65mx5.name.com86
66mailforward.dnsv.jp86
67amazon-smtp.amazon.com86
68mx8.name.com85
69mx7.name.com85
70mx1.atmosphere.facct.ru85
71mx2.atmosphere.facct.ru85
72mx.zoho.com.cn84
73mx1.email-cluster.com84
74mx2.email-cluster.com84
75mx.hetemail.jp83
76mx2.zoho.com.cn83
77void.blackhole.mx82
78failover1.email-cluster.com82
79mx-backup.serveriai.lt81
80antispam1.ihs.com.tr79
81antispam2.ihs.com.tr79
82mx3-dk.centerasecurity.dk78
83mail.global.frontbridge.com78
84sitemail.everyone.net77
85mx1.netim.net76
86mx2.netim.net76
87mx01.1and1.fr76
88mxint01.1and1.com76
89mxint02.1and1.com76
90mx-proxy501.heteml.jp76
91mx-01.mail-forwarder.io76
92mx00.1and1.fr75
93mx-proxy502.heteml.jp75
94mx-02.mail-forwarder.io74
95smtp.faisco.cn71
96mx.vshosting.eu71
97mx.sendcloud.org70
98mail.parktons.com70
99mx01.1and1.es70
100q01es.mail.s-web.de70

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1yunyou.top138
2_spf.edhost.eu120
3spf.263.net117
4spf-00181c02.pphosted.com116
5qcloudmail.com114
6spf.pitcom.net112
7spf.kirim.email110
8_spf.mail-neoserv.si109
9mlrcloud.com109
10_spf.maileroo.com107
11gateways.firstdata.com107
12spf.ssmx.net105
13_spf.localservices.com.br104
14_spf.exsilia.net104
15_spf.octadesk.com104
16outbound.smtp.wisestamp.net103
17spf.boldem.cz102
18_spf.armada.it102
19spf.v6send.net102
20spf.cesky-hosting.cz101
21spf.betrend.com101
22spf-2248456.jmsend.com100
23_spf.abcp.ru100
24amazon.com99
25_spf.presscloud.com99
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26_spf.wpopt.net99
27spf.splio.com98
28mailing.eqs.com97
29spf.w4ymail.at97
30spf.squalomail.com96
31send.k-crm.jp96
32spf-bulk.axa.com96
33spf.greengeeks.net95
34relay.thundermail.uk95
35_spf.academicworks.com95
36_spf01.mykronos.com95
37spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl95
38_spf.ogicom.pl95
39spf.mailcamp.nl94
40dospf.simplepart.com94
41spf.qb-feedback.com93
42_spf.simpleviewinc.com93
43_pmta2.antevenio.com93
44usermail.zohocreator.com92
45ofsys.com92
46_spf.sendnode.com92
47mfg.siteprotect.com92
48relay.email-cluster.com92
49spf.satorimail.net92
50spf.spcloud.jp92
51verifymyfafsa.com92
52spf91
53spf.cyberimpact.com90
54spfref.jackhenry.com90
55fmx.etius.jp90
56spf.sendios.io90
57spf.aams4.jp90
58relay.guzelhosting.com90
59_spf.aid.no90
60spf-002fa101.pphosted.com89
61spf.symplicity.com89
62spf.protection.outlook89
63_spf.axa.com89
64mail.feedblitz.com89
65ciphr247.com88
66spf.qboxmail.com88
67smtp-cluster.plusvps.com88
68eversrv.com87
69_spf.sent2email.com87
70_spf-dc10.sapsf.com87
71spf.redpoints.com87
72_spf.tld-mx.com86
73spf.host-ww.net86
74spf.emailfilter.io86
75spf.icontroller.eu86
76no-ip.com86
77spf.filteredmx.net86
78_spf.shared-server.net86
79sendgrid.com85
80spf.sosafe.de85
81spf.chinaemail.cn85
82spf.remarkety.com84
83spf-00596a01.pphosted.com84
84mailmailmail.net84
85_spf.eemsg.mail.mil84
86_spf.zorgmail.nl84
87spf.shared.spaceship.host84
88_spf.webglobe.cz84
89universalspf.org83
90x.universalspf.org83
91custmail.vdata.com83
92spf.oximailing.com83
93spf.w2solution.com83
94senders.mailmasterplus.net83
95spf.pantheon.io82
96spf-0024c501.pphosted.com82
97_spf.lh.pl82
98euromsg.net82
99spf.form.run81
100_spf.herodesk-mails.io81

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet. For pre-2022 history we additionally use OpenINTEL's alexa source (the legacy Alexa top-1M list, retired 2023).

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample & cadence

Each report covers a single date — the latest OpenINTEL snapshot with <24h delay, typically ~700 k domains with MX records and ~620 k with SPF. The pipeline runs daily at 23:00 Europe/Moscow; each daily run produces an HTML report, a JSON summary, an updated time-series, and incremental updates to the domain registry (§ 12). No sub-sampling.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py, currently ~310 patterns). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP / SaaS / forwarder / gateway classification (SPF-based)

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against open classification dictionaries (ESPs, mailbox-as-sender, anti-spam gateways, forwarders, SaaS senders, DMARC vendors, NS providers, verification tokens).

Resolution order: PURE_ESP → MAILBOX_AS_SENDER → GATEWAYS → FORWARDERS → bare-apex substring fallback → SAAS_SENDERS substring iteration. Bare-apex derivation strips leading _spf., _spf-eu., spf., mail. prefixes from dict keys to catch subdomain variants (e.g. _spf.m1.websupport.sk → matches websupport.sk). Malformed includes (no dot, <4 chars) are filtered.

One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously, so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains. Current SPF-include classification coverage: ~81.5% (up from ~38.5% baseline).

Limitation: "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IP ranges to fit the 10-lookup limit) is not detectable from DNS alone — those domains appear ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used.

5. DMARC (deep)

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for:

  • p= (apex policy): none / quarantine / reject / invalid
  • sp= (subdomain policy)
  • pct= (rollout percentage)
  • rua= aggregate-report destinations → classified into vendor buckets (Postmark DMARC, Valimail, dmarcian, URIports, EasyDMARC, Red Sift, Proofpoint EFD, Agari/Fortra, …) using dictionaries/dmarc_vendors.py

A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent — defaults to 100).

6. SPF mechanics & health

For every SPF record we additionally extract:

  • Final qualifier on the all mechanism: -all (hard fail), ~all (soft fail), ?all (neutral), +all (pass-everything — broken / dangerous), or missing
  • DNS lookup count (include:, redirect=, a:, mx:, exists:, ptr:) — each mechanism counts as 1 against the spec limit of 10. Records exceeding the limit return PermErr at recipients
  • Mechanism mix: include-only (modern), raw IP4/IP6 ranges only (legacy/flattened), mixed
  • Record byte length: percentiles to flag fragmentation risk (>450 B)

7. Email security maturity

Adoption of modern mail-security TXT records, parsed from the same OpenINTEL parquet:

  • MTA-STS: TXT at _mta-sts.<domain> with v=STSv1 — domain advertises required-TLS to its MX
  • BIMI: TXT at default._bimi.<domain> with v=BIMI1 — brand publishes a verified logo (requires p=reject)
  • TLS-RPT (SMTP TLS Reporting): TXT at _smtp._tls.<domain> with v=TLSRPTv1 — domain monitors TLS-failure reports
  • DKIM selectors: where the OpenINTEL scan includes *._domainkey.<domain> queries, well-known selectors (google, selector1/2, s1/s2, k1/k2/k3, mailo, mte1, …) are mapped to issuing ESPs

8. DNS provider classification

For each domain's NS RRset, every NS hostname is matched against a suffix dictionary (dictionaries/ns_providers.py) with patterns for Cloudflare, AWS Route 53, Azure DNS, Google Cloud DNS, GoDaddy, Akamai, NS1, UltraDNS, Yandex, DNSPod, Aliyun, OVH, Hetzner, Gandi, registrars, and others. A domain is assigned to its dominant NS provider; ties resolve to whichever pattern was matched first.

9. SaaS-via-verification-tokens

Many SaaS apps a domain is connected to never appear in SPF (because the SaaS doesn't send mail FROM the customer domain). To recover this signal we parse apex TXT records for verification tokens — google-site-verification=…, MS=…, atlassian-domain-verification=…, stripe-verification=…, plus ~70 other patterns in dictionaries/verification_tokens.py. This produces a complementary "SaaS density" metric and surfaces apps that the SPF-only view misses.

10. Email infrastructure modernity

Three additional TLS / IPv6 metrics:

  • IPv6-on-MX: MX hostname has at least one AAAA record
  • DANE / TLSA on MX: TLSA record at _25._tcp.<mx_host> (where the parquet includes TLSA queries)
  • CAA: any 0 issue … / 0 issuewild … record at apex; CAs aggregated into a market-share view (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Sectigo, …)

11. Cross-tabulations

  • Country × ESP heatmap: top-15 ccTLDs × top-15 ESPs, cell = % of country's SPF-publishing domains using ESP X. Surfaces regional ESP champions (Brevo / FR, Unisender / RU, MailerLite / LT, Akna / BR, Shoptet / CZ).
  • Mailbox × ESP combinations: stacked frequency of common stack pairings (Google Workspace + HubSpot, MS365 + Marketo, …).

12. Domain registry & identifiers

Every domain ever observed across snapshots is assigned a stable integer ID in /var/openintel-cache/registry/domains.sqlite3 (currently ~1.2 M domains). Reports reference domains by ID rather than embedding strings; clients resolve names from a single gzipped registry dump (/email-stats/domains.csv.gz, ~13 MB). This keeps per-report payloads compact, enables fast set-operation diffs across snapshots, and gives every domain a first-seen / last-seen timestamp.

13. Daily change-alerts feed

Each daily run computes a domain-level diff vs the previous scan and emits a change-feed at /email-stats/alerts.html (also as JSON + Atom). Detected events: ESP added/removed in SPF, DMARC policy upgrade/downgrade, primary-mailbox-provider change, SPF strict→soft regression, MTA-STS / BIMI first publication. Severity tag is good / bad / info.

14. Per-entity detail pages

The top-100 ESPs, top-100 SaaS senders and top-80 mailbox providers each have a dedicated detail page at /email-stats/detail/<kind>/<slug>.html showing KPI cards, a Chart.js sparkline (from history.json), TLD distribution and a sample of customer domains.

15. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k / top-10k / top-100k / top-1M / unranked.

16. Reproducibility & data hygiene

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary file hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept long-term (per OpenINTEL data agreement). The domain registry stores names but no record-level content.

17. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented. The alexa source used for pre-2022 history has a different composition (~960 k domains, US-heavier).
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see § 4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (Mimecast/Proofpoint customers using their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.
  • DKIM enumeration is selector-based — only domains whose well-known selectors are scanned by OpenINTEL appear in the DKIM layer.
  • Long-tail unmatched: ~18.5% of SPF includes belong to a long tail of regional hosters (~84 k unique singletons). This is a fundamental ceiling of any dictionary-based method — filling it would require manual research of 1500+ providers.
  • Newly-added dictionary entries have no historical sparkline until ≥ 2 daily scans accumulate, since archived raw parquet is purged after parsing per the OpenINTEL data agreement.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-06-26 — 666 177 MX, 624 950 SPF2026-06-25 — 665 951 MX, 624 772 SPF2026-06-24 — 665 655 MX, 624 551 SPF2026-06-23 — 665 823 MX, 624 757 SPF2026-06-22 — 665 950 MX, 625 047 SPF2026-06-21 — 667 342 MX, 626 553 SPF2026-06-20 — 669 301 MX, 628 455 SPF2026-06-19 — 661 817 MX, 621 795 SPF2026-06-18 — 661 882 MX, 622 049 SPF2026-06-17 — 661 091 MX, 621 709 SPF2026-06-16 — 660 933 MX, 621 836 SPF2026-06-15 — 662 137 MX, 623 017 SPF2026-06-14 — 650 734 MX, 612 415 SPF2026-06-13 — 650 753 MX, 612 354 SPF2026-06-12 — 651 025 MX, 612 617 SPF2026-06-11 — 651 209 MX, 612 707 SPF2026-06-10 — 651 319 MX, 612 713 SPF2026-06-09 — 650 861 MX, 612 459 SPF2026-06-08 — 650 013 MX, 611 648 SPF2026-06-07 — 649 787 MX, 611 420 SPF2026-06-06 — 658 426 MX, 619 451 SPF2026-06-05 — 659 595 MX, 620 522 SPF2026-06-04 — 660 158 MX, 620 940 SPF2026-06-03 — 660 101 MX, 620 354 SPF2026-06-02 — 660 335 MX, 620 446 SPF2026-06-01 — 662 428 MX, 622 222 SPF2026-05-31 — 667 641 MX, 626 984 SPF2026-05-30 — 663 036 MX, 622 559 SPF2026-05-29 — 663 271 MX, 622 553 SPF2026-05-28 — 663 075 MX, 622 229 SPF2026-05-27 — 663 040 MX, 621 877 SPF2026-05-23 — 660 587 MX, 620 034 SPF2026-05-22 — 657 556 MX, 617 016 SPF2026-05-21 — 659 930 MX, 619 421 SPF2026-05-20 — 659 568 MX, 618 994 SPF2026-05-19 — 661 300 MX, 620 621 SPF2026-05-18 — 653 826 MX, 613 816 SPF2026-05-17 — 652 834 MX, 613 060 SPF2026-05-16 — 653 289 MX, 613 507 SPF2026-05-15 — 653 883 MX, 614 025 SPF2026-05-14 — 654 606 MX, 614 742 SPF2026-05-13 — 654 450 MX, 614 641 SPF2026-05-12 — 654 613 MX, 614 806 SPF2026-05-11 — 654 275 MX, 614 529 SPF2026-05-10 — 654 198 MX, 614 496 SPF2026-05-09 — 654 965 MX, 615 249 SPF2026-05-08 — 664 721 MX, 624 279 SPF2026-05-07 — 662 493 MX, 622 130 SPF2026-05-06 — 661 868 MX, 621 451 SPF2026-05-05 — 662 628 MX, 622 150 SPF2026-05-04 — 662 839 MX, 622 414 SPF2026-05-03 — 671 505 MX, 630 301 SPF2026-05-02 — 666 074 MX, 625 213 SPF2026-05-01 — 664 902 MX, 624 104 SPF2026-04-30 — 665 325 MX, 624 448 SPF2026-04-29 — 665 578 MX, 624 625 SPF2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF2018-05-01 — 1 168 881 MX, 732 275 SPF2018-04-01 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2018-03-01 — 827 056 MX, 516 103 SPF2018-02-01 — 1 195 663 MX, 725 044 SPF2018-01-01 — 813 525 MX, 512 876 SPF2017-12-01 — 818 419 MX, 513 903 SPF2017-11-01 — 815 080 MX, 507 477 SPF2017-10-01 — 823 380 MX, 508 173 SPF2017-09-01 — 815 671 MX, 500 347 SPF2017-08-01 — 829 376 MX, 505 516 SPF2017-07-01 — 830 824 MX, 502 438 SPF2017-06-01 — 828 635 MX, 497 007 SPF2017-05-01 — 828 210 MX, 493 097 SPF2017-04-01 — 828 454 MX, 490 217 SPF2017-03-01 — 824 804 MX, 483 151 SPF2017-02-01 — 839 476 MX, 482 733 SPF2017-01-01 — 827 995 MX, 470 990 SPF2016-12-01 — 825 158 MX, 467 480 SPF2016-11-01 — 837 849 MX, 472 624 SPF2016-10-01 — 838 377 MX, 469 807 SPF2016-09-01 — 835 089 MX, 462 936 SPF2016-08-01 — 848 095 MX, 469 528 SPF2016-07-01 — 842 098 MX, 463 893 SPF2016-06-01 — 848 829 MX, 462 786 SPF2016-05-01 — 843 824 MX, 455 820 SPF2016-04-01 — 843 843 MX, 449 460 SPF2016-03-01 — 865 090 MX, 456 873 SPF2016-02-01 — 862 585 MX, 450 683 SPF2016-01-22 — 845 356 MX, 440 606 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2026-06-27. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-06-28T21:05:50Z.