Who uses what for email DAILY

Mailbox providers and ESPs across the Tranco top-1M — snapshot of 2026-06-29.

671 597
Domains with MX
630 016
Domains with SPF
463 035
Domains with DMARC
671 597
Total scanned

What you're looking at. Four headline counts for the analysed Tranco snapshot: how many domains publish each kind of email-related DNS record. Higher MX vs SPF gap = more domains receive mail than authorise sending; higher SPF vs DMARC gap = SPF adopted but no policy/feedback enforcement yet.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · KPIs

Top mailbox providers

What this block shows. Where each domain hosts incoming mail — derived from its primary MX record (lowest mx_preference). This is the receiving side of email: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho, on-prem Exchange, etc. "Generic / unmatched" buckets are common mail.* / mx*.* hostnames we couldn't attribute to a specific provider; "Unknown / Other" is everything else.

#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
1Self-Hosted →153 69622.89%
2Google Workspace →144 89121.57%
3Microsoft 365 →111 59716.62%
4Unknown / Other →52 6897.85%
5Generic / unmatched (mx*.*) →18 4152.74%
6Proofpoint →12 7721.9%
7Generic / unmatched (mail.*) →11 5831.72%
8Yandex 360 →10 9501.63%
9Cloudflare Email Routing →10 5871.58%
10Mimecast →10 2851.53%
Show rows 11 – 30
#Mailbox providerDomainsShare of MX-having domains
11Hostinger →7 8861.17%
12Zoho Mail →6 8171.02%
13Namecheap Email Forwarding →6 7451.0%
14QQ Mail (Tencent) →5 5790.83%
15GoDaddy →4 9710.74%
16Amazon WorkMail →4 7650.71%
17OVH Mail →4 6540.69%
18Mail.ru for Business →3 6540.54%
191&1 IONOS →3 6090.54%
20Barracuda →3 5470.53%
21SpamExperts (SolarWinds) →2 8890.43%
22Proofpoint Essentials →2 8410.42%
23Jellyfish (Namecheap) →2 7440.41%
24Cisco IronPort →2 7280.41%
25Mailgun (inbound) →2 3120.34%
26Rackspace Email →2 2750.34%
27Beget (RU) →2 2660.34%
28Alibaba Mail (China) →2 0890.31%
29Zoho Mail (EU) →1 7760.26%
30Hosted Email (Rackspace/IONOS) →1 6930.25%
🏠 Open Providers portfolio → cards with country, blurb, sparkline & TLD breakdown — click any provider name above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top mailbox providers

Long-tail / Unknown MX — the rest of the internet

What this block shows. The slice of domains whose mailbox cannot be attributed to a named provider — regional hosters, self-built Postfix/Exim, corporate gateways, niche ESPs. Researchers ask for this specifically because it captures the deliverability reality outside the Google / Microsoft monoculture. The detailed report drills down into Top-1000 most common unmatched hosts, 100 hand-picked curiosities (longest one-off names) and a TLD breakdown.

Unknown / Generic share
12.47%
83 728 domains
Unique unmatched MX hosts
37 019
individual hostnames in the long tail
Self-hosted
22.91%
153 872 domains running their own MX
📋 Open detailed long-tail report →·⬇ Download top-1000 unmatched MX (CSV)·⬇ Download 100 curiosities (CSV)

Top ESPs / mass-mailing services

What this block shows. Outbound mass-mailing platforms each domain authorises in its SPF record — the marketing-automation, transactional-email and customer-engagement layer (SendGrid, Mailchimp, Mailgun, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, etc.). One domain can use several ESPs, so percentages sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains.

#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Amazon SES →38 7896.16%
2SendGrid (Twilio) →29 8344.74%
3Mailgun →25 6594.07%
4Zendesk →24 0943.82%
5Mailchimp →23 1713.68%
6Mandrill →21 1453.36%
7HubSpot →20 0493.18%
8Salesforce →16 3912.6%
9Mailjet (Sinch) →13 3072.11%
10Cloudflare Email Routing →11 2131.78%
Show rows 11 – 30
#ESPDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11Mimecast →8 9951.43%
12Brevo (ex-Sendinblue) →8 8541.41%
13MailerSend →7 9501.26%
14Namecheap Forwarding →7 0151.11%
15MailChannels →6 7761.08%
16Elastic Email →4 4270.7%
17Unisender (RU) →3 6170.57%
18Constant Contact →3 6000.57%
19Campaign Monitor →3 4910.55%
20Marketo (Adobe) →3 2950.52%
21Zoho Campaigns →3 2450.52%
22Emsd1 (transactional) →3 0250.48%
23Postmark →2 9540.47%
24SendPulse →2 9270.46%
25SparkPost →2 6970.43%
26Exclaimer (signatures) →2 6790.43%
27Zoho ZeptoMail →2 6710.42%
28Help Scout →2 3460.37%
29Salesforce Marketing Cloud →2 2270.35%
30Barracuda Essentials →2 1760.35%
📮 Open Mailing services portfolio → all detected ESPs with descriptions, country, sparklines — click any ESP above to drill into a detail page

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top ESPs

SaaS senders (Notion, Slack, Zendesk, Atlassian, Stripe…)

What this block shows. SaaS apps that send mail FROM a customer's domain on the customer's behalf — productivity, support, payments, HR, e-commerce and other business apps appearing as include: targets in the customer's SPF. Distinct from ESPs (mass-mailing platforms) and mailbox providers (where the inbox lives).

#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
1Shopify →5 3050.84%
2Pardot (Salesforce) →4 9570.79%
3CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 →4 4820.71%
4KnowBe4 →3 5510.56%
5Statuspage (Atlassian) →2 1420.34%
6Trustpilot →1 8810.3%
7Atlassian (Jira/Confluence) →1 8650.3%
8Firebase (Google) →1 8310.29%
9Lark / Feishu →1 2950.21%
10BigCommerce →1 2040.19%
Show rows 11 – 30
#SaaS appDomainsShare of SPF-publishing domains
11NetSuite (Oracle) →1 1360.18%
12Sage Intacct →1 1230.18%
13Qualtrics →1 1040.18%
14Oracle Cloud Email →1 0660.17%
15Docebo (LMS) →9310.15%
16WordPress.com / WP Cloud →9240.15%
17Oracle Cloud →8320.13%
18One.com (DK hosting) →8040.13%
19Zoho Books →7060.11%
20AFAS →6640.11%
21Greenhouse →6190.1%
22SAP SuccessFactors →5920.09%
23PayPal Braintree →5800.09%
24ClickDimensions →5730.09%
25UKG / UltiPro →5590.09%
26Autotask (ConnectWise) →5020.08%
27TOPdesk →4610.07%
28ConnectWise →4590.07%
29FormAssembly →4470.07%
30Freshservice (Freshworks) →4440.07%
📧 Open SaaS/ESP senders portfolio → SaaS apps sending FROM customer domains — click any SaaS name above for detail

Trend — last 30 day(s) · Top SaaS senders

DMARC adoption

What this block shows. The policy each DMARC-publishing domain advertises at _dmarc.<domain>: none = monitor only, quarantine = mark as spam on fail, reject = drop on fail, invalid = a syntactically broken record. "Enforced %" treats only quarantine / reject with pct=100 as actually enforcing.

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC enforced %

7d ago▼ -0.03%30d ago▼ -0.06%

Trend — last 30 day(s) · DMARC policies

Top 100 most-used DMARC records (verbatim)

The literal record string copied verbatim from DNS — useful to spot copy-pasted "starter" policies and identify reporting endpoints (the rua= / ruf= tags) shared across many domains.

#DMARC recordDomains
1v=DMARC1; p=none;57 459
2v=DMARC1; p=none32 769
3v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com8 719
4v=DMARC1; p=quarantine;4 963
5v=DMARC1; p=quarantine4 019
6v=DMARC1; p=reject;3 815
7v=DMARC1;p=none;3 716
8v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;3 324
9v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s3 227
10v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com3 165
11v=DMARC1; p=reject2 871
12v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;2 847
13v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r;2 637
14v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=1002 381
15v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; ruf=mailto:dmarc@mailinblue.com!10m; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=864002 079
16v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;2 039
17v=DMARC1;p=none1 792
18v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; sp=none1 785
19v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r;1 527
20v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;1 439
21v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;fo=11 319
22v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 288
23v=DMARC1;p=reject;1 247
24v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=864001 245
25v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email1 242
Show rows 26 – 100
#DMARC recordDomains
26v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;1 021
27v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none1 016
28v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none;996
29v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;989
30v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:ewai10d2@ag.eu.dmarcian.com; ruf=mailto:ewai10d2@fr.eu.dmarcian.com969
31v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com913
32v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com; ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com881
33v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s820
34v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email759
35v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100730
36v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com717
37v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100714
38v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400673
39v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; ruf=mailto:dmarc@qiye.163.com; rua=mailto:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com668
40v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com617
41v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net; adkim=r; aspf=r;609
42v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400553
43v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100;530
44v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@qq.com517
45v=DMARC1;p=quarantine509
46v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;509
47v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;459
48v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;adkim=s;aspf=s456
49v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_agg@vali.email;439
50v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;427
51v=DMARC1; p=none; adkim=r; aspf=r381
52v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; adkim=r; aspf=r373
53v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; fo=1363
54v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100;354
55v=DMARC1351
56v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;329
57v=DMARC1;p=reject327
58v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s324
59v=DMARC1;p=reject;fo=1;rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com324
60v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; ruf=mailto:dmarc@smtp.mailtrap.live; rf=afrf; pct=100310
61v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rf=afrf; pct=100; ri=86400308
62v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:tnoff9hr@ag.eu.dmarcadvisor.com; aspf=s; adkim=s;305
63v=DMARC1; p=none; fo=1303
64v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com; ruf=mailto:dmarcrecord@gmail.com;299
65v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;297
66v=DMARC1; p=none; aspf=r; adkim=r287
67v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100;fo=0;rf=afrf;ri=86400276
68v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;pct=50;adkim=r;aspf=r;272
69v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:mailauth-reports@google.com272
70v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100259
71v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;fo=1256
72v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:dmarc_report@service.aliyun.com252
73v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com236
74v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;233
75v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:rua-mpse@mpub.ne.jp220
76v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc.report@axa.com;214
77v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r213
78v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@onsecureserver.net;213
79v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com212
80v=DMARC1; p=reject; fo=1; ri=3600; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com206
81v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc.rua@edrone.app; ruf=mailto:dmarc.ruf@edrone.app204
82v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:zicaptxt@ag.dmarcian.com;200
83v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject195
84v=DMARC1;p=none;sp=none;adkim=r;aspf=r;pct=100189
85v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-raports@dhosting.pl189
86v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@reporting.unisender.com187
87v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; rua=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@ag.eu.dmarcly.com; ruf=mailto:61e7fc8674b33@fo.eu.dmarcly.com; sp=quarantine; fo=1;186
88v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; aspf=s; pct=100185
89v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100;184
90v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r183
91v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@fbl.optin.com;181
92v=DMARC1;p=none;rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com181
93v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com; ruf=mailto:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com;178
94v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; fo=1174
95v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; sp=none; pct=100; ri=86400173
96v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100;aspf=r;adkim=r;172
97v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=r; aspf=r;168
98v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100; adkim=s; aspf=s162
99v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; adkim=r; aspf=r162
100v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=100159

Unmatched MX targets — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular MX hostnames our dictionary does not yet attribute to a named mailbox provider. Public list — these feed back into dictionaries/mx_providers.py for the next iteration so coverage keeps improving.

#MX targetDomains
1nan5 702
2localhost480
3asapsemi1.mail.protection.office365.us367
4mx-biz.mail.am0.yahoodns.net335
5mx.services275
6mail260
7mx01.1and1.com210
8mx00.1and1.com205
9zonemx.eu187
10mail1.sbnation.com167
11~161
12mail.autoline.com.ua156
13mx2.z-ns.net155
14alltheemails.com146
15mx.email-messaging.com143
16mxi.alpha-prm.jp118
17mx00.1and1.co.uk117
18lbmx.bcc.gov.bd117
19s.mail.dcsaas.net116
20mx.simply.com115
21uk.mx1.mailanyone.net115
22uk.mx2.mx25.net115
23mx1d10.thinline.cz115
24mx1b20.thinline.cz115
25mx01.1and1.co.uk114
Show rows 26 – 100
#MX targetDomains
26mx240.umbler.co.uk113
27relay1.netnames.net112
28relay2.netnames.net112
29uk.mx3.mailanyone.net112
30mx364.umbler.com112
31se.mx1.mailanyone.net111
32se.mx2.mx25.net111
33mx10.websupport.sk111
34mx20.websupport.sk111
35mx1.cleanmx.pt107
36uk.mx4.mx25.net107
37se.mx3.mailanyone.net106
38mx2.cleanmx.pt106
39se.mx4.mx25.net105
40mx1.ticketsinbound.com103
41cloudmail.auto-vision.ru99
42mx.maxns.net99
43mx2.ticketsinbound.com99
44mwpremgw1.ocn.ad.jp97
45mwpremgw2.ocn.ad.jp97
46mailin.mx-hub.sk95
47mx.zoho.com.au94
48mx2.zoho.com.au94
49mailin.mx-hub.cz94
50mx3.zoho.com.au93
51mx01.mailplug.com91
52mx02.mailplug.com90
53mailin.mx-hub.eu90
54mx01.lancloud.ru90
55mx02.lancloud.ru90
56mx3.name.com89
57mx03.lancloud.ru89
58mx04.lancloud.ru89
59mail.vipmailservice.com89
60mx4.name.com88
61mx.hetemail.jp87
62mx6.name.com87
63mx5.name.com87
64mailforward.dnsv.jp87
65smtp-fwd.wordpress.com87
66mx8.name.com86
67mx7.name.com86
68mx.zoho.com.cn85
69amazon-smtp.amazon.com85
70mx1-dk.centerasecurity.dk84
71mx2-dk.centerasecurity.dk84
72mx2.zoho.com.cn84
73mx1.atmosphere.facct.ru84
74mx2.atmosphere.facct.ru84
75void.blackhole.mx82
76mx-proxy501.heteml.jp81
77antispam1.ihs.com.tr80
78antispam2.ihs.com.tr80
79mx-proxy502.heteml.jp80
80mx-backup.serveriai.lt80
81mx01.1and1.fr78
82mx00.1and1.fr77
83mx1.email-cluster.com77
84mx2.email-cluster.com77
85mxint01.1and1.com76
86mxint02.1and1.com76
87sitemail.everyone.net76
88mx.aams4.jp76
89mx3-dk.centerasecurity.dk76
90mail.global.frontbridge.com76
91mx-01.mail-forwarder.io76
92failover1.email-cluster.com75
93mx1.netim.net74
94mx2.netim.net74
95mx-02.mail-forwarder.io74
96smtp.faisco.cn73
97mx-0.aams4.jp73
98mx-1.aams4.jp73
99mx01.1and1.es72
100smtp-avas.seeweb.it72

Unmatched SPF includes — top 100

What this block shows. The most popular SPF include: targets that don't match any known ESP, mailbox-as-sender, or SaaS pattern yet. Same feedback loop: top hits get added to dictionaries/esps.py or dictionaries/saas_senders.py.

#SPF includeDomains
1yunyou.top140
2_spf.edhost.eu120
3qcloudmail.com116
4spf-00181c02.pphosted.com115
5_spf.mail-neoserv.si115
6spf.263.net115
7spf.kirim.email113
8spf.pitcom.net112
9mlrcloud.com109
10_spf.armada.it109
11_spf.maileroo.com108
12spf.boldem.cz108
13_spf.octadesk.com107
14_spf.localservices.com.br107
15gateways.firstdata.com106
16spf.ssmx.net104
17spf.cesky-hosting.cz104
18send.k-crm.jp104
19_spf.exsilia.net103
20outbound.smtp.wisestamp.net102
21spf.v6send.net101
22spf.betrend.com101
23spf-2248456.jmsend.com100
24_spf.presscloud.com100
25_spf.wpopt.net99
Show rows 26 – 100
#SPF includeDomains
26spf.splio.com99
27spf.aams4.jp99
28_spf.abcp.ru99
29amazon.com99
30spf.w4ymail.at98
31dospf.simplepart.com97
32mailing.eqs.com97
33spf.squalomail.com97
34spf.mijndomeinhosting.nl97
35spf.mailcamp.nl96
36_spf.ogicom.pl96
37spf.greengeeks.net96
38spf-bulk.axa.com95
39_pmta2.antevenio.com95
40_spf.academicworks.com95
41_spf01.mykronos.com94
42spf.qb-feedback.com93
43spf.mailii.org93
44relay.guzelhosting.com93
45spf.spcloud.jp93
46_spf.simpleviewinc.com93
47spf.cyberimpact.com92
48mfg.siteprotect.com92
49relay.thundermail.uk92
50spf.host-ww.net92
51_spf.sendnode.com92
52fmx.etius.jp92
53spf.satorimail.net92
54verifymyfafsa.com92
55spf.shared.spaceship.host91
56ofsys.com91
57spf.emailfilter.io90
58senders.mailmasterplus.net90
59smtp-cluster.plusvps.com90
60spf90
61spfref.jackhenry.com90
62_spf.shared-server.net90
63spf.symplicity.com90
64spf-002fa101.pphosted.com89
65usermail.zohocreator.com89
66spf.sendios.io89
67_spf.webglobe.cz89
68_spf.aid.no89
69_spf.tld-mx.com88
70eversrv.com88
71spf.protection.outlook88
72mail.feedblitz.com88
73spf.shopserve.jp88
74_spf.axa.com87
75_spf.sent2email.com87
76_spf-dc10.sapsf.com87
77ciphr247.com87
78spf.redpoints.com87
79spf.qboxmail.com87
80spf.icontroller.eu86
81no-ip.com86
82mailmailmail.net85
83relay.email-cluster.com85
84sendgrid.com85
85_spf.lh.pl84
86spf.oximailing.com84
87spf.filteredmx.net84
88_spf.eemsg.mail.mil84
89spf.remarkety.com84
90spf.sosafe.de83
91_spf.herodesk-mails.io83
92_spf.we.wedos.net83
93spf.chinaemail.cn83
94spf.w2solution.com83
95custmail.vdata.com83
96spf-00596a01.pphosted.com83
97universalspf.org82
98x.universalspf.org82
99spf.pantheon.io82
100_spf.zorgmail.nl82

Methodology — how the numbers were produced

1. Data source

The dataset is the daily OpenINTEL forward-DNS Tranco snapshot (University of Twente / SURFnet / SIDN Labs). OpenINTEL queries the entire Tranco top-1M domain list daily for MX, TXT, NS, A, AAAA, SOA, CAA, DNSSEC and other records, publishing the results as Apache Parquet. For pre-2022 history we additionally use OpenINTEL's alexa source (the legacy Alexa top-1M list, retired 2023).

Cite: Roland van Rijswijk-Deij et al., "A High-Performance, Scalable Infrastructure for Large-Scale Active DNS Measurements", IEEE JSAC 2016.

2. Sample & cadence

Each report covers a single date — the latest OpenINTEL snapshot with <24h delay, typically ~700 k domains with MX records and ~620 k with SPF. The pipeline runs daily at 23:00 Europe/Moscow; each daily run produces an HTML report, a JSON summary, an updated time-series, and incremental updates to the domain registry (§ 12). No sub-sampling.

3. Mailbox provider classification

For each domain we read its MX RRset and pick the record with the lowest mx_preference as the primary mailbox host. The hostname of that primary MX is matched against an open regex dictionary (dictionaries/mx_providers.py, currently ~310 patterns). Specific patterns (e.g. .mail.protection.outlook.com) are tried first; generic fallbacks (mail.*, mx*.*) only after. Domains whose MX matches no rule are kept as "Unknown / Other" — never dropped — and exported in Unmatched MX targets for dictionary improvement.

4. ESP / SaaS / forwarder / gateway classification (SPF-based)

For each domain's apex SPF record (TXT starting with v=spf1) we extract every include: and redirect= target and resolve them against open classification dictionaries (ESPs, mailbox-as-sender, anti-spam gateways, forwarders, SaaS senders, DMARC vendors, NS providers, verification tokens).

Resolution order: PURE_ESP → MAILBOX_AS_SENDER → GATEWAYS → FORWARDERS → bare-apex substring fallback → SAAS_SENDERS substring iteration. Bare-apex derivation strips leading _spf., _spf-eu., spf., mail. prefixes from dict keys to catch subdomain variants (e.g. _spf.m1.websupport.sk → matches websupport.sk). Malformed includes (no dot, <4 chars) are filtered.

One domain may use several ESPs simultaneously, so ESP shares sum to more than 100% of SPF-publishing domains. Current SPF-include classification coverage: ~81.5% (up from ~38.5% baseline).

Limitation: "flattened" SPF (where include chains were replaced with raw IP ranges to fit the 10-lookup limit) is not detectable from DNS alone — those domains appear ESP-less even when an ESP is in fact used.

5. DMARC (deep)

For each domain we query the _dmarc.<domain> TXT record. Records starting with v=DMARC1 are parsed for:

  • p= (apex policy): none / quarantine / reject / invalid
  • sp= (subdomain policy)
  • pct= (rollout percentage)
  • rua= aggregate-report destinations → classified into vendor buckets (Postmark DMARC, Valimail, dmarcian, URIports, EasyDMARC, Red Sift, Proofpoint EFD, Agari/Fortra, …) using dictionaries/dmarc_vendors.py

A domain is counted as enforced if p=quarantine or p=reject with pct=100 (or pct absent — defaults to 100).

6. SPF mechanics & health

For every SPF record we additionally extract:

  • Final qualifier on the all mechanism: -all (hard fail), ~all (soft fail), ?all (neutral), +all (pass-everything — broken / dangerous), or missing
  • DNS lookup count (include:, redirect=, a:, mx:, exists:, ptr:) — each mechanism counts as 1 against the spec limit of 10. Records exceeding the limit return PermErr at recipients
  • Mechanism mix: include-only (modern), raw IP4/IP6 ranges only (legacy/flattened), mixed
  • Record byte length: percentiles to flag fragmentation risk (>450 B)

7. Email security maturity

Adoption of modern mail-security TXT records, parsed from the same OpenINTEL parquet:

  • MTA-STS: TXT at _mta-sts.<domain> with v=STSv1 — domain advertises required-TLS to its MX
  • BIMI: TXT at default._bimi.<domain> with v=BIMI1 — brand publishes a verified logo (requires p=reject)
  • TLS-RPT (SMTP TLS Reporting): TXT at _smtp._tls.<domain> with v=TLSRPTv1 — domain monitors TLS-failure reports
  • DKIM selectors: where the OpenINTEL scan includes *._domainkey.<domain> queries, well-known selectors (google, selector1/2, s1/s2, k1/k2/k3, mailo, mte1, …) are mapped to issuing ESPs

8. DNS provider classification

For each domain's NS RRset, every NS hostname is matched against a suffix dictionary (dictionaries/ns_providers.py) with patterns for Cloudflare, AWS Route 53, Azure DNS, Google Cloud DNS, GoDaddy, Akamai, NS1, UltraDNS, Yandex, DNSPod, Aliyun, OVH, Hetzner, Gandi, registrars, and others. A domain is assigned to its dominant NS provider; ties resolve to whichever pattern was matched first.

9. SaaS-via-verification-tokens

Many SaaS apps a domain is connected to never appear in SPF (because the SaaS doesn't send mail FROM the customer domain). To recover this signal we parse apex TXT records for verification tokens — google-site-verification=…, MS=…, atlassian-domain-verification=…, stripe-verification=…, plus ~70 other patterns in dictionaries/verification_tokens.py. This produces a complementary "SaaS density" metric and surfaces apps that the SPF-only view misses.

10. Email infrastructure modernity

Three additional TLS / IPv6 metrics:

  • IPv6-on-MX: MX hostname has at least one AAAA record
  • DANE / TLSA on MX: TLSA record at _25._tcp.<mx_host> (where the parquet includes TLSA queries)
  • CAA: any 0 issue … / 0 issuewild … record at apex; CAs aggregated into a market-share view (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Sectigo, …)

11. Cross-tabulations

  • Country × ESP heatmap: top-15 ccTLDs × top-15 ESPs, cell = % of country's SPF-publishing domains using ESP X. Surfaces regional ESP champions (Brevo / FR, Unisender / RU, MailerLite / LT, Akna / BR, Shoptet / CZ).
  • Mailbox × ESP combinations: stacked frequency of common stack pairings (Google Workspace + HubSpot, MS365 + Marketo, …).

12. Domain registry & identifiers

Every domain ever observed across snapshots is assigned a stable integer ID in /var/openintel-cache/registry/domains.sqlite3 (currently ~1.2 M domains). Reports reference domains by ID rather than embedding strings; clients resolve names from a single gzipped registry dump (/email-stats/domains.csv.gz, ~13 MB). This keeps per-report payloads compact, enables fast set-operation diffs across snapshots, and gives every domain a first-seen / last-seen timestamp.

13. Daily change-alerts feed

Each daily run computes a domain-level diff vs the previous scan and emits a change-feed at /email-stats/alerts.html (also as JSON + Atom). Detected events: ESP added/removed in SPF, DMARC policy upgrade/downgrade, primary-mailbox-provider change, SPF strict→soft regression, MTA-STS / BIMI first publication. Severity tag is good / bad / info.

14. Per-entity detail pages

The top-100 ESPs, top-100 SaaS senders and top-80 mailbox providers each have a dedicated detail page at /email-stats/detail/<kind>/<slug>.html showing KPI cards, a Chart.js sparkline (from history.json), TLD distribution and a sample of customer domains.

15. Tier breakdown

Each domain is assigned a tier from its Tranco rank: top-1k / top-10k / top-100k / top-1M / unranked.

16. Reproducibility & data hygiene

Every published report includes the exact OpenINTEL date, dictionary file hashes, and counts of unmatched MX hosts and SPF includes — so any reader can verify or reproduce the figures. Raw OpenINTEL parquet is downloaded into a temporary cache and deleted after analysis; only aggregated, non-redistributable counts are kept long-term (per OpenINTEL data agreement). The domain registry stores names but no record-level content.

17. Limitations to be aware of

  • Tranco bias. Top-1M skews toward US/EU and global SaaS; ccTLD-only domains with low traffic may be under-represented. The alexa source used for pre-2022 history has a different composition (~960 k domains, US-heavier).
  • SPF flattening hides ESP identity (see § 4).
  • CNAME chains on MX (e.g. mail.example.com → mail.example.protection.outlook.com) are not unrolled — only the first MX target is matched. This biases a small share of domains toward "Unknown" when their MX is a CNAME to a known provider.
  • Vanity MX with white-label provider (Mimecast/Proofpoint customers using their own brand) is not detectable from DNS alone.
  • DKIM enumeration is selector-based — only domains whose well-known selectors are scanned by OpenINTEL appear in the DKIM layer.
  • Long-tail unmatched: ~18.5% of SPF includes belong to a long tail of regional hosters (~84 k unique singletons). This is a fundamental ceiling of any dictionary-based method — filling it would require manual research of 1500+ providers.
  • Newly-added dictionary entries have no historical sparkline until ≥ 2 daily scans accumulate, since archived raw parquet is purged after parsing per the OpenINTEL data agreement.

Comments & corrections

Spotted a mis-classified MX target, missed ESP, or want to discuss a finding? We publish corrections in the next daily snapshot.

Send feedback to support@live-direct-marketing.online

Inline comments coming soon. For now, email is the fastest path — you'll see your fix reflected in tomorrow's run.

Historical reports

Daily snapshots — last 90 days kept fully, older ones thinned to monthly.

2026-06-28 — 667 370 MX, 626 001 SPF2026-06-27 — 666 220 MX, 624 986 SPF2026-06-26 — 666 177 MX, 624 950 SPF2026-06-25 — 665 951 MX, 624 772 SPF2026-06-24 — 665 655 MX, 624 551 SPF2026-06-23 — 665 823 MX, 624 757 SPF2026-06-22 — 665 950 MX, 625 047 SPF2026-06-21 — 667 342 MX, 626 553 SPF2026-06-20 — 669 301 MX, 628 455 SPF2026-06-19 — 661 817 MX, 621 795 SPF2026-06-18 — 661 882 MX, 622 049 SPF2026-06-17 — 661 091 MX, 621 709 SPF2026-06-16 — 660 933 MX, 621 836 SPF2026-06-15 — 662 137 MX, 623 017 SPF2026-06-14 — 650 734 MX, 612 415 SPF2026-06-13 — 650 753 MX, 612 354 SPF2026-06-12 — 651 025 MX, 612 617 SPF2026-06-11 — 651 209 MX, 612 707 SPF2026-06-10 — 651 319 MX, 612 713 SPF2026-06-09 — 650 861 MX, 612 459 SPF2026-06-08 — 650 013 MX, 611 648 SPF2026-06-07 — 649 787 MX, 611 420 SPF2026-06-06 — 658 426 MX, 619 451 SPF2026-06-05 — 659 595 MX, 620 522 SPF2026-06-04 — 660 158 MX, 620 940 SPF2026-06-03 — 660 101 MX, 620 354 SPF2026-06-02 — 660 335 MX, 620 446 SPF2026-06-01 — 662 428 MX, 622 222 SPF2026-05-31 — 667 641 MX, 626 984 SPF2026-05-30 — 663 036 MX, 622 559 SPF2026-05-29 — 663 271 MX, 622 553 SPF2026-05-28 — 663 075 MX, 622 229 SPF2026-05-27 — 663 040 MX, 621 877 SPF2026-05-23 — 660 587 MX, 620 034 SPF2026-05-22 — 657 556 MX, 617 016 SPF2026-05-21 — 659 930 MX, 619 421 SPF2026-05-20 — 659 568 MX, 618 994 SPF2026-05-19 — 661 300 MX, 620 621 SPF2026-05-18 — 653 826 MX, 613 816 SPF2026-05-17 — 652 834 MX, 613 060 SPF2026-05-16 — 653 289 MX, 613 507 SPF2026-05-15 — 653 883 MX, 614 025 SPF2026-05-14 — 654 606 MX, 614 742 SPF2026-05-13 — 654 450 MX, 614 641 SPF2026-05-12 — 654 613 MX, 614 806 SPF2026-05-11 — 654 275 MX, 614 529 SPF2026-05-10 — 654 198 MX, 614 496 SPF2026-05-09 — 654 965 MX, 615 249 SPF2026-05-08 — 664 721 MX, 624 279 SPF2026-05-07 — 662 493 MX, 622 130 SPF2026-05-06 — 661 868 MX, 621 451 SPF2026-05-05 — 662 628 MX, 622 150 SPF2026-05-04 — 662 839 MX, 622 414 SPF2026-05-03 — 671 505 MX, 630 301 SPF2026-05-02 — 666 074 MX, 625 213 SPF2026-05-01 — 664 902 MX, 624 104 SPF2026-04-30 — 665 325 MX, 624 448 SPF2026-04-29 — 665 578 MX, 624 625 SPF2026-04-28 — 663 645 MX, 622 920 SPF2026-04-27 — 665 219 MX, 624 507 SPF2026-04-26 — 673 272 MX, 632 104 SPF2026-04-01 — 667 720 MX, 625 567 SPF2026-03-01 — 683 543 MX, 639 798 SPF2026-02-01 — 688 114 MX, 641 985 SPF2026-01-01 — 660 114 MX, 616 352 SPF2025-12-01 — 668 692 MX, 622 313 SPF2025-11-01 — 659 524 MX, 613 922 SPF2025-10-01 — 644 366 MX, 599 103 SPF2025-09-01 — 685 366 MX, 635 390 SPF2025-08-01 — 681 988 MX, 632 521 SPF2025-07-01 — 687 700 MX, 638 068 SPF2025-06-01 — 699 879 MX, 648 954 SPF2025-05-01 — 711 257 MX, 659 028 SPF2025-04-01 — 702 306 MX, 651 786 SPF2025-03-01 — 705 611 MX, 653 173 SPF2025-02-01 — 696 358 MX, 644 666 SPF2025-01-01 — 674 214 MX, 626 064 SPF2024-12-01 — 675 247 MX, 626 465 SPF2024-11-01 — 669 912 MX, 614 354 SPF2024-10-01 — 659 879 MX, 603 315 SPF2024-09-01 — 660 693 MX, 604 347 SPF2024-08-01 — 639 733 MX, 586 007 SPF2024-07-02 — 632 526 MX, 578 066 SPF2024-06-01 — 614 961 MX, 562 373 SPF2024-05-01 — 621 817 MX, 566 602 SPF2024-04-01 — 641 948 MX, 582 732 SPF2024-03-01 — 666 638 MX, 601 954 SPF2024-02-01 — 653 497 MX, 588 373 SPF2024-01-01 — 657 371 MX, 586 519 SPF2023-12-01 — 660 455 MX, 588 456 SPF2023-11-01 — 666 944 MX, 591 587 SPF2023-10-01 — 675 039 MX, 597 200 SPF2023-09-01 — 694 895 MX, 612 567 SPF2023-08-01 — 716 729 MX, 622 501 SPF2023-07-01 — 653 321 MX, 565 370 SPF2023-06-01 — 656 260 MX, 561 661 SPF2023-05-01 — 657 236 MX, 561 046 SPF2023-04-01 — 662 162 MX, 562 122 SPF2023-03-01 — 730 155 MX, 620 415 SPF2023-02-01 — 715 023 MX, 602 519 SPF2023-01-01 — 712 767 MX, 599 702 SPF2022-12-01 — 712 641 MX, 594 977 SPF2022-11-01 — 710 891 MX, 590 969 SPF2022-10-01 — 716 152 MX, 594 587 SPF2022-09-01 — 716 956 MX, 595 410 SPF2022-08-11 — 427 823 MX, 354 634 SPF2022-07-01 — 968 388 MX, 789 788 SPF2022-06-01 — 1 026 911 MX, 833 170 SPF2022-05-01 — 921 706 MX, 748 398 SPF2022-04-01 — 1 217 939 MX, 976 244 SPF2022-03-01 — 975 521 MX, 779 131 SPF2022-02-01 — 569 414 MX, 464 224 SPF2022-01-01 — 552 174 MX, 447 427 SPF2021-12-01 — 786 477 MX, 631 833 SPF2021-11-01 — 525 808 MX, 424 311 SPF2021-10-01 — 794 460 MX, 633 349 SPF2021-09-01 — 788 407 MX, 628 585 SPF2021-08-01 — 619 384 MX, 493 457 SPF2021-07-01 — 728 817 MX, 579 133 SPF2021-06-01 — 660 453 MX, 523 956 SPF2021-05-01 — 788 324 MX, 620 170 SPF2021-04-01 — 792 560 MX, 621 808 SPF2021-03-01 — 646 458 MX, 507 824 SPF2021-02-01 — 430 383 MX, 339 425 SPF2021-01-01 — 714 286 MX, 554 817 SPF2020-12-01 — 814 029 MX, 629 118 SPF2020-11-01 — 748 490 MX, 574 865 SPF2020-10-01 — 618 268 MX, 476 027 SPF2020-09-01 — 768 508 MX, 586 561 SPF2020-08-01 — 754 330 MX, 572 036 SPF2020-07-01 — 947 188 MX, 717 066 SPF2020-06-01 — 703 956 MX, 531 244 SPF2020-05-01 — 965 680 MX, 721 262 SPF2020-04-01 — 859 917 MX, 639 926 SPF2020-03-01 — 780 292 MX, 579 459 SPF2020-02-01 — 947 773 MX, 696 310 SPF2020-01-01 — 565 274 MX, 417 038 SPF2019-12-01 — 826 277 MX, 600 095 SPF2019-11-01 — 1 039 570 MX, 747 867 SPF2019-10-01 — 966 667 MX, 692 386 SPF2019-09-01 — 838 362 MX, 594 935 SPF2019-08-01 — 1 162 343 MX, 819 141 SPF2019-07-01 — 1 177 952 MX, 806 744 SPF2019-06-01 — 1 205 558 MX, 822 402 SPF2019-05-01 — 1 196 890 MX, 811 837 SPF2019-04-01 — 1 120 142 MX, 752 449 SPF2019-03-01 — 1 170 801 MX, 787 932 SPF2019-02-01 — 1 202 345 MX, 799 255 SPF2019-01-01 — 1 190 206 MX, 783 686 SPF2018-12-01 — 1 196 068 MX, 792 282 SPF2018-11-01 — 1 177 133 MX, 775 137 SPF2018-10-01 — 1 140 868 MX, 743 256 SPF2018-09-01 — 1 183 473 MX, 765 011 SPF2018-08-01 — 1 194 344 MX, 772 448 SPF2018-07-01 — 1 165 617 MX, 745 554 SPF2018-06-01 — 1 193 038 MX, 753 513 SPF2018-05-01 — 1 168 881 MX, 732 275 SPF2018-04-01 — 1 174 598 MX, 730 483 SPF2018-03-01 — 827 056 MX, 516 103 SPF2018-02-01 — 1 195 663 MX, 725 044 SPF2018-01-01 — 813 525 MX, 512 876 SPF2017-12-01 — 818 419 MX, 513 903 SPF2017-11-01 — 815 080 MX, 507 477 SPF2017-10-01 — 823 380 MX, 508 173 SPF2017-09-01 — 815 671 MX, 500 347 SPF2017-08-01 — 829 376 MX, 505 516 SPF2017-07-01 — 830 824 MX, 502 438 SPF2017-06-01 — 828 635 MX, 497 007 SPF2017-05-01 — 828 210 MX, 493 097 SPF2017-04-01 — 828 454 MX, 490 217 SPF2017-03-01 — 824 804 MX, 483 151 SPF2017-02-01 — 839 476 MX, 482 733 SPF2017-01-01 — 827 995 MX, 470 990 SPF2016-12-01 — 825 158 MX, 467 480 SPF2016-11-01 — 837 849 MX, 472 624 SPF2016-10-01 — 838 377 MX, 469 807 SPF2016-09-01 — 835 089 MX, 462 936 SPF2016-08-01 — 848 095 MX, 469 528 SPF2016-07-01 — 842 098 MX, 463 893 SPF2016-06-01 — 848 829 MX, 462 786 SPF2016-05-01 — 843 824 MX, 455 820 SPF2016-04-01 — 843 843 MX, 449 460 SPF2016-03-01 — 865 090 MX, 456 873 SPF2016-02-01 — 862 585 MX, 450 683 SPF2016-01-22 — 845 356 MX, 440 606 SPF
Data source: https://openintel.nl/data/forward-dns/top-lists/
Generated automatically from OpenINTEL Tranco snapshot 2026-06-29. Aggregates only — raw OpenINTEL data is deleted after analysis per their data agreement.
Last build: 2026-06-30T21:06:46Z.